On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Do we still have
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
> >> > toget
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
>> > together?
>>
>> See
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
> > together?
>
> See
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de
True, but the current license i
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
> together?
See
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DB
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 03:35:39PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Well, you'd have to use MacPorts' version of the openssl libraries,
> > too, since there'd be no certainty that their headers match the
> > Apple-provided libraries (in fact, I'd bet a lot that they don't).
> > This would be a pain if
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "David E. Wheeler" writes:
I don’t suppose anyone has looked at what it would take to get PostgreSQL
use Secure Transport, right?
>
>>> This is going to put a
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "David E. Wheeler" writes:
> >>> I don’t suppose anyone has looked at what it would take to get
> PostgreSQL use Secure Transport, right?
>
> >> This is going to put a
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "David E. Wheeler" writes:
>>> I donât suppose anyone has looked at what it would take to get PostgreSQL
>>> use Secure Transport, right?
>> This is going to put a bit more urgency into the project Heikki had been
>> wo
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" writes:
>> Looks like Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan has remove the OpenSSL header files.
>> They recommend building your own or using native OS X SDKs, like Secure
>> Transport:
>> http://lists.apple.com/archives/macnetworkprog/
"David E. Wheeler" writes:
> Looks like Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan has remove the OpenSSL header files.
> They recommend building your own or using native OS X SDKs, like Secure
> Transport:
> http://lists.apple.com/archives/macnetworkprog/2015/Jun/msg00025.html
That's annoying.
> I donât s
Hackers,
Looks like Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan has remove the OpenSSL header files. They
recommend building your own or using native OS X SDKs, like Secure Transport:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/macnetworkprog/2015/Jun/msg00025.html
I don’t suppose anyone has looked at what it would take t
12 matches
Mail list logo