Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: Hi Tom, Trolling -hackers for attachments would require a deal of manual attention, unfortunately, because a lot of messages of that kind would be bug reports not patches. I'm not real sure that there aren't some non-patch attachments on -patche

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Hi Tom, > Trolling -hackers for attachments would require a deal of manual > attention, unfortunately, because a lot of messages of that kind > would be bug reports not patches. I'm not real sure that there > aren't some non-patch attachments on -patches as well. > That's why we need a Bug Trac

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Marc G. Fournier wrote: please let me know the URL for the message, so that I can see what it was overlooked, and see if I can't improve the 'search' ... Marc - here is one I submitted that was not picked up :-) http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00145.php regards Mark ---

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josh Berkus originally wrote: Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180. Perhaps this is the gist of the problem:

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Jürgen Cappel
This thread somehow reminds me how the company I'm working for tries to measure my profitability: lines of code edited, number of bugs fixed in what time, and other odd things :-) Sorry if this is the wrong subject ... Greg Sabino Mullane schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josh Berkus originally wrote: > Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count > of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180. Perhaps this is the gist of the problem: the 180 count was not "patch submitt

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-06 Thread Tom Lane
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You just consider the plain text attachments. What about the encoded > attachments [1] and the gziped [2] ones? And what of people who sent patches in-line (not as MIME-ified attachments)? Or who sent them to -hackers instead of -patches? T

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-05 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Hi Marc, > > > I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots > of names > > missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't > going to > > work. > Me too. Maybe some improvement in the routine. > When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to?

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-05 Thread Oliver Jowett
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Well I'm positive I submitted all my pg_autovacuum patches to the patches list, however searching the archives for autovacuum I can't find anything that old. How far back to the searchable archives go? back to 96 or so ... :

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of names missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't going to work. When you submit'd your p

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-05 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of names missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't going to work. When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to? As I said

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of names missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't going to work. When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to? As I said, this list is of all tho

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-05 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of names missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't going to work. Matthew Marc G. Fournier wrote: Using the same search for 7.4 shows only 48 patch submitters, based on posts to pgsql-patches ... Aizaz Ahme

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Using the same search for 7.4 shows only 48 patch submitters, based on posts to pgsql-patches ... Aizaz Ahmed Alvaro Herrera Andreas Pflug Andrew Dunstan Barry Lind Bertrand Petit Bruce Momjian Bruno Wolff Christopher Browne Christopher Kings-Lynne Dave Cramer Dennis Björklund Fernando Nasser Ga

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: But let me see if I can come up with some *very* rought #s ... 57 ... Alvaro Herrera Andreas Pflug Andrew Dunstan Andrew Hammond Bruce Momjian Christopher Kings-Lynne Claudio Natoli Dave Page David Fetter Dennis Bjorklund Ed L. Fabien COELHO Gaetano Mendo

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: I did it last time. It's been a while now, but I think what I did was basically look at all the commit messages from the previous release to the current one, and then used a perl script to extract everything that looked like a name or an email address.

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> I didn't do it, but it might have been a guess of mine. > > Ya, I don't recall doing it either :) I did it last time. It's been a while now, but I think what I did was basically look at all the commit messages from the previous release to the

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus writes: >> How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit? > I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*, > not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox. Trolling through the pgsql-patches archives might work

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
yOn Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: Marc, How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit? I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*, not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox. I didn't do it, but

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc, > > > How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit? > > I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*, > not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox. I didn't do it, but it might have been a gu

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Josh Berkus
Marc, > How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit? I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*, not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox. --Josh -- __Aglio Database Solutions___ Josh Berkus

Re: [HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc and/or Bruce: > > Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count > of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180. How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit? -- Bruce Momjian| http

[HACKERS] Patch Count?

2005-02-04 Thread Josh Berkus
Marc and/or Bruce: Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the pl