Great, thanks :)
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So, this is one of those "known problem, improved in v7.2" sort of issues?
>
> Yup.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Marc G
which I believe is what the rserv implementation in contrib currently does
... no?
its funny ... what is in contrib right now was developed in a weekend by
Vadim, put in contrib, yet nobody has either used it *or* seen fit to
submit patches to improve it ... ?
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Zeugswetter A
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > Is there a relative consensus for how often to run vacuum? I have a
> > table of about 8 columns that I fill with 100,000 items simply via a "\i
> > alarms.sql". After 1,000 items or so it gets extremely slow to fill with
> > data, and
8k ...
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Andy Samuel wrote:
> The same question ... how's the size after you vacuum the tables/db ?
>
> > continuous UPDATEs happening to his table, no INSERTs, no DELETEs ... and
> > his tables quicklky grow from a 8k table to 65Meg if there is no vacuum
> > happening every
Now that you've narrowed it down to a specific table, at least you can
specifically vacuum just that table and ignore the rest of the database
...might help a bit?
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mike Cianflone wrote:
> After the comment by someone about the UPDATE being responsible for
> the reason
This is just a quick announcement that we have now branched off v7.1.x
from the main development tree, and are starting to dive into development
of v7.2 ...
There have been several changes since v7.1 was released, including:
Fix for numeric MODULO operator (Tom)
pg_dump fixes (Philip)
pg_dump c
takes Vince a day or two to catch up ... yes, we are officially released,
and Tom just dump'd some major stats changes into HEAD ...
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Does this mean that we have officially released 7.1.1? I could not
> find any statements regarding 7.1.1 on the web pag
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release.
> Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out.
Ummm ... unless there are any changes that would require someone to
recompile their apps between v7.1.1 and v7.1.2, I don't think so
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release.
> > Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out.
>
> I thought I did that long ago for 7.1, or I should have anyway. I don't
> see the commits either. Seems we can't do it in a min
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm talking about the minor number. The only thing that effects is
> that executables would pick up the new version if they have the old
> one in the path as well, no potential problems.
Okay, but, what does that buy you? One overwrites the old lib
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Are we releasing tomorrow. I will stamp the CVS STABLE branch tonight
> as 7.1.2.
Not that I'm aware of ... I heard mention something about a couple of
fixes, but we *just* put out 7.1.1 ...
If ppl are affected by the bugs, use cvsup and set yoru tag
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I agree with you because the bug is very critical.
>
> Yes, I'd like to get that plpgsql bug fix out as soon as possible.
Isn't this only critical for those that are using it? Does it affect
those that don't us
it is a branch ... for lack of a better way to work it:
symbolic names:
REL7_1_STABLE: 1.106.0.2
REL7_1_BETA: 1.79
REL7_1_BETA3: 1.86
REL7_1_BETA2: 1.86
REL7_1: 1.102
REL7_0_PATCHES: 1.70.0.2
REL7_0: 1.70
REL6_5_PATCHES: 1.52.0.2
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Isn't this only critical for those that are using it? Does it affect
> > those that don't use plpgsql?
>
> No, but I think it's pretty critical for those that do
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Can someone tell me what we use indislossy for?
> >
> > IIRC it means that if you get something by this index you must check
> > again in the actual data
> >
> > I think that at least the GIST intarray (actually intset
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am loathe to even bring this up, but with two messages today about it, I am
> going to be short and sweet:
>
> We don't have a reasonable upgrade path. ASCII dump->install
> new->initdb->restore is not
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 16 May 2001 19:05, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 May 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > I am loathe to even bring this up, but with two messages today about
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> > >> 1. Space reclamation via UNDO doesn't excite me a whole lot, if we can
> > >> make lightweight VACUUM work well.
> >
> > > Sorry, but I'm going to consider background vacuum as temporary solution
> > > only. As I've already pointed, original PG aut
which ones should I pull in? the ones in ~/ftp/pub/doc/7.1? or is there
newer along that tree that we need to generate?
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
>
> > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.1.2 ...
> >
> > Just want a
all mirrors use rsync to update their code, and all of those that are
listed at www.postgresql.org, both ftp and www, are no more then 2 days
old (Vince, it is two days we set it at, right?) ...
On Wed, 23 May 2001, bpalmer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > every time I've tr
later this evening
after some of the mirrors have had a chance to download ...
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
>
> > which ones should I pull in? the ones in ~/ftp/pub/doc/7.1? or is there
> > newer along that tree that we need to gen
okay, just removed the .hidden directory from the ftp server, which should
correct that ... I had setup that .hidden directory to be excluded though,
not sure why it was bothering things :(
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, bpalmer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > However, it se
trust me ... girls are soo much fun ... *roll eyes* *watches for
lightening*
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> > I had a baby girl on Tuesday. I am working through my
> > backlogged emails
> > today.
>
> Congratulations -:)
>
> Vadim
>
> ---(end of broad
already fixed ...
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Marc,
>
> when I try to reach http://fts.postgresql.org/ I see
> http://www.hub.org/
>
> what's happens ?
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.re
Tatsuo ... setting up a seperate CVS module for this does sound like a
great idea ... you already have access to the CVS repository, right? Can
you send me a tar file containing what you have so far, and I'll get it
into CVS and then you'll be able to update that at will?
If we set it up as:
p
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>
> > Hi, some PostgreSQL users in Japan have been translating 7.1 docs into
> > Japanese. I hope the work would finish within 1-2 months. My question
> > is how the translated docs could be merged into the doc source tree
> > on
Morning ...
I'm trying to wrack my brain over something here, and no matter
how I try and look at it, I'm drawing a blank ...
I have two tables that are dependent on each other:
notes (86736 tuples) and note_links (173473 tuples)
The relationship is that one no
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > FROM note_links nl, notes n LEFT JOIN calendar c ON (n.nid = c.nid)
> > WHERE (n.type = 'A' OR n.type = 'N' OR n.type = 'H' OR n.type =
something like this, web based, would be most cool ... have to be able to
monitor multiple port/backends too ...
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-1] Pedro Abelleira Seco wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm thinking about starting a (serius) project to
> bring a good graphical interface to the administration
Perfect, thank you ... i knew I was overlooking something obvious ... the
query just flies now ...
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Try adding ... AND n.nid = 15748 ... to the WHERE.
>
> > n.nid is the note
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How far off is 7.2? Ages?
>
> Hopefully not. I'd like to see us get back on a reasonably short
> release cycle, like every six months or less --- the last couple
> major release cycles have been pai
What is the postgres process doing? what does iostat show for disk I/O?
from reading this, you are comparing apples->oranges ... are the drives
the same on the non-SMP as the SMP? amount of RAM? speed of CPUs? hard
drive controllers with same amount of cache on them? etc, etc, etc ...
On Thu
there, and I just cleared out about 500Meg+ of old garbage ... 1.2gig free
again ...
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Chris Bowlby wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I removed an ISO that Corey had made for me, that should free up some
> space.
>
> > /home/projects/pgsql partiti
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?
was going to ask this too ... someone going patch-happy again? :)
> * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001028 11:34]:
> > Applied. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > > Okay, here's my attempt at fixing the pr
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
something screwed up, possibly in the configs ... subscriptions should all
be fine, but have to fix the configurations after getting these reloaded
...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
one list at a time, I move and test .. -hackers is the second ...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
is anyone else getting these but me?
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
I believe that its just resting on Vadim again to give us the go ahead
... which I believe its always been on his shoulders, no? :)
Vadim?
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Vadim Mikheev writes:
>
> > WAL todo list looks like:
>
> So what's the latest on going beta?
>
> --
>
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Steve Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 13:47] wrote:
> >
> > > >(Incidentally, we've toyed around with developping a
> > query-caching
> > > > system that would sit betwen PostgreSQL and our DB libraries.
> > >
> > > Sounds amazing, but
As a large part of you will have noticed by now, this past week has been
killer on the mailing lists. One of the web clients on that machine
decided to not warn us of one of their countries holidays, and, as a
result, we got hit with a diluge of hits, similar to a slashdot effect ...
We ordered
Morning all ...
Today, we are moving the mailing lists over to the new mail
server. There *might* be a brief period where any mail sent to the lists
will be returned with a 'user unknown' error, as there will be a brief
period where the aliases will be disabled on the old server and the
even better, of course, is the fact that you aren't even on this list:
Majordomo>unsubscribe pgsql-hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: no matching addresses.
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jones, Colin wrote:
> I want off this list immediately!!! If I am not o
sounds great, then hopefully we get v7.0.3 out early next week :) thanks
...
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am back, and will resolve the cvs and brand 7.0.3 tomorrow.
>
>
> >
> > this week, once I hear from bruce that he's ready ... last I heard, he was
> > back with his old
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, sorry about the delay. Also, I will send a report to core about
> the summit.
is there a reason why -hackers wouldn't be interested as well? *raised
eyebrow*
>
> >
> > sounds great, then hopefully we get v7.0.3 out early next week :) thanks
>
okay, to date I've just been manually fixing stuff like this, but its time
to debug what the problem is here ...
so, what have you tried to do to set it as digest, and what error did you
get?
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I too got somehow on the list without subscribing.
>
sorry, the migration this past weekend was to remove all traces of hub.org
from the list addresses ... we built a 'virtual server' that now houses
the postgresql.org mailing lists, so you need to send to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and it should work ...
please try that and let me know if it works or not
In order that we can get a few days of testing on these, make sure the
packaging is right and whatnot, we are holding off on a formal release
until early->mid next week ...
I've just put pre-release tar balls into:
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.0.3
Please take a minute to down
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ned Lilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, here in relatively minor form is the First Example of a Great
> > Bridge Priority (which Tom, Bruce, and Jan have all predicted would
> > come... ;-)
>
> Hmm. I wasn't aware that Jan had done it at Great Bri
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Ned Lilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, here in relatively minor form is the First Example of a Great
> > > Bridge Priority (which Tom, Bruce, and Jan have all predicted would
> > > come... ;-)
> >
> > Hmm. I wasn't aware that Jan had don
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I do have a question -- just how much configuration (and other) changes
> > occurred to REL7_0_PATCHES (since the logs seem to not be telling the
> > whole story)?
> > I say this because I found at least one such cha
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Ned Lilly wrote:
> We recognize this is a temporary hack - and fully expect it to go away
> in 7.1 We actually think that the final solution might be more
> appropriate in pg_dump itself than pg_dumpall, but that's obviously a
> much more breakable proposition (hence the separ
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I do feel strongly about this ... 7.0.3 was considered in a release state
> > *before* it was committed, pending your docs changes ... personally, if we
> > leave this in contrib,
I'm tryin to figure out how to speed up udmsearch when run under
postgresql, and am being hit by atrocious performance when using a LIKE
query ... the query looks like:
SELECT ndict.url_id,ndict.intag
FROM ndict,url
WHERE ndict.word_id=1971739852
AND url.rec_id=ndict.url_id
AND (ur
yowch ... removing that one index makes my 'test' search (mvcc) come back
as:
[97366] SQL 0.05s: SELECT ndict.url_id,ndict.intag FROM ndict,url WHERE
ndict.word_id=572517542 AND url.rec_id=ndict.url_id AND (url.url LIKE
'http://www.postgresql.org/%')
vs what we were doing before ... now, let
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 21:59 5/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >Looks like a great kluge to me ;-)
> >
>
> Hmph. I prefer to think of it as a 'user-defined optimizer hint'. ;-}
Except, if we are telling it to get rid of using the index, may as well
get rid of it altoge
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Philip Warner wrote:
> >> At 21:59 5/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>> Looks like a great kluge to me ;-)
> >>
> >> Hmph.
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 23:12 5/11/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> >Except, if we are telling it to get rid of using the index, may as well
> >get rid of it altogether, as updates/inserts would be slowed down by
> >having to update that
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I am adding a new TODO item:
> > > * Add SET PERFORMANCE_TIPS option to suggest INDEX, VACUUM, VACUUM
> > > ANALYZE, and CLUSTER
> > > Seems we should be able to emit NOTICE messages suggesting perf
what version of CVS are you running? when was the last time you did
anything with it?
cvs on hub hasn't been upgraded since Sept 13th, so it isn't an upgrade
issue ... and just tested from work, and I can checkout no probs ...
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Here's what I get
ya know, I always love seeing email's like this ... what time do you
consider to be the end of the day? and going directly to the top means
talking to ... wow, me. and its the end of my day here, and I don't have
you off yet, so now you are in a pickle, no? :)
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jones, Colin
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001109 18:55] wrote:
> > > I guess the immediate question is do we want to hold up 7.0.3 release
> > > for a fix? This bug is clearly ancient, so I'm not sure it's
> > > appropriate to go through a fire drill to f
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom, if you can plug this one in the next, say, 48hrs (Saturday night),
>
> Done. Want to generate some new 7.0.3 release-candidate tarballs?
Done, and just forced a sync to ftp.post
If its that easy to fix the regress test so that it passes, can we get it
committed and build a new tarball so that ppl doing regression on v7.0.3
see a clean regress?
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The only remaining failure is geometry. The
fixed, let mek now if there are any others I've missed ...
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Are the @postgresql.org addresses supposed to work?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:13 PM
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> when trying to do
> > get -R RedHat-6.x RedHat-7.0 Mandrake-7.x
>
> I got
>
> get RedHat-7.0: server said: Permission denied on server. (Transfer
> limits exceeded)
>
> aftre all of RedHat-6.x was retrieved
>
> is there any reason for this ?
Yes,
I'm at Comdex right now, but when I'm around, I'm on channel ...
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I remeber a few developers used to gather on efnet irc,
> there was a lot of instability recently that seems to have
> cleared up even more recently.
>
> Are you guys planning on co
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have talked to GB and they understand their error.
Until the next time? This isn't the first time you've "talked to
them" ...
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, xuyifeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anyone tell me when Postgresql 7.1 will be released?
about a month after it goes beta ... which should be over the next couple
of weeks ...
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >Well, yes. Why isn't it?
> > >
> > >Full text indexing should be just as much a feature as any other key feature in
> > >PG.
> > >With the advent of unlimited file and record lengths in 7.1, this would be a good
> > >time to
> > >include it.
> > >
>
After a couple of pre-release tarballs, the PostgreSQL Developers are
proud to announce v7.0.3, our most stable release yet.
There have been *several* fixes in this release, from v7.0.2, but, being a
minor release, there have been *no* changes that will require a
dump/restore to happen ... down
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, xuyifeng wrote:
> no doubt, I have touched some problems PG has, right? if PG is so good,
> is there any necessary for the team to improve PG again?
There is always room for improvements for any software package ... whether
it be PgSQL, Linux, FreeBSD or PHPBuilder ...
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, xuyifeng wrote:
> you are complete wrong, if I don't like PG, I'll never go here or talk
> anything about PG, I don't care it. I just want PG can be improved
> quickly, for me crash recover is very urgent problem, otherewise PG is
> forced to stay on my desktop machine, We'll
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> xuyifeng wrote:
> >
>
> I just noticed this conversation so I have not followed all of it,
> but you seem to have strange priorities
>
> > I just want PG can be improved quickly, for me crash recover is very urgent
>problem,
>
> Crash avoidance is
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 03:25 PM 11/28/00 -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
> >Mitch Vincent wrote:
> >>
> >> This is one of the not-so-stomped boxes running PostgreSQL -- I've never
> >> restarted PostgreSQL on it since it was installed.
> >> 12:03pm up 122 days, 7:54, 1 user, lo
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Jeff, feel like trying out the True64 install and seeing how it
> > goes? Worst case, we have to install Redhat from scratch *shrug*
>
> > Tom, anything on that machine that
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Boeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > is anyone working on the port of PostgreSQL for Alpha FreeBSD ??
>
> Not that I know about. DEC/Compaq was kind enough to lend the project
> an Alpha for testing, but it's running Linux (RedHat 6.2).
We've als
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 09:43 AM 11/13/00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I made it all the way through the article. I'll summarize it for you:
> >Postgres - hooray!
> >MySQL - boo!
> >Since this is an open source database article linked off of slashdot, I
> >imagine they'
v7.1 should improve crash recovery for situations like this ... you'll
still have to do a recovery of the data on corruption of this magnitude,
but at least with the WAL stuff that Vadim is producing, you'll be able to
recover up until the point that the power cable was pulled out of the wall
...
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 07:02 PM 11/30/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> >v7.1 should improve crash recovery for situations like this ... you'll
> >still have to do a recovery of the data on corruption of this magnitude,
> >but at least
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Nathan Myers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:47:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> > > At 07:02 PM 11/30/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > >
> > > >v7.1 should impro
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Nathan Myers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:02:01PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > v7.1 should improve crash recovery ...
> > ... with the WAL stuff that Vadim is producing, you'll be able to
> > recover up until the point tha
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc has them all listed .. not sure how to
> > get there from the Web site ... Vince?
>
> There are links from both the Develo
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> In any case, can we create pgsql-politics so we don't have to go over
> this issue every three months? Can we create pgsql-benchmarks while we
> are at it, to take care of the other thread that keeps popping up?
no skin off my back:
pgs
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> > I *am* one of those volunteers
>
> Yes, I well remember you screwing up PG 7.0 just before beta, without bothering
> to test your code, and leaving on vacation.
>
> You were irresponsible then, and you're being irresponsible now.
Okay, so let me get
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Horst Herb wrote:
> > > Branding. Phone support lines. Legal departments/Lawsuit prevention.
> Figuring
> > > out how to prevent open source from stealing the thunder by duplicating
> ^^
> > > features. And building
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> >
> > > > I *am* one of those volunteers
> > >
> > > Yes, I well remember you screwing up PG 7.0 just before beta, withou
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, mlw wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > > I know this is a borderline rant, and I am sorry, but I think it is very
> > > important that the integrity of open source be preserved at 100% because
> > > it is a very slippery slope, and we are all surrounded by the temptation
> > >
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> > If you write a program which stands on its own, takes no work from
> > uncompensated parties, then you have the unambiguous right to do what
> > ever you want.
>
> Thats a given.
okay, then now I'm confused ... neither SePICK or erServer are derive
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 11:00 PM 12/2/00 -0800, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> >> There is risk here. It isn't so much in the fact that PostgreSQL, Inc
> >> is doing a couple of modest closed-source things with the code. After
> >> all, the PG community has long acknowleged that the
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> > If this is the impression that someone gave, I am shocked ... Thomas
> > himself has already posted stating that it was a scheduale slip on his
> > part.
>
> Actually, Thomas said:
>
> Thomas> Hmm. What has kept replication from happening in th
... pretty much, ya, that sums it up ...
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "The Hermit Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gary MacDougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "mlw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Hannu Krosing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 08:53:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> >
> > > > If you write a program which stands on its own, takes no work from
> > > > u
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 11:59 PM 12/3/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > the sanctity of the *core* server is *always*
> >foremost in our minds, no matter what other projects we are working on ...
>
> What happens if financially things aren'
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Junfeng Zhang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am new to postgreSQL. When I read the documents, I find out the
> Postmaster daemon actual spawns a new backend server process to serve
> a new client request. Why not use threads instead? Is that just for a
> historical reason, or som
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> >A recent example of non-sinister change in another area is the work done
> >to release 7.0.3. This is a release which would not have happened in
> >previous cycles, since we are so close to beta on 7.1. But GB paid Tom
> >Lane to work on it as part of *the
if we were to do this in steps, I beliee that one of the major problems
irght now is that we have global variables up the wazoo ... my
'thread-awareness' is limited, as I've yet to use them, so excuse my
ignorance ... if we got patches that cleaned up the code in stages, moving
towards a cleaner
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> On Sunday 03 December 2000 04:00, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> > > There is risk here. It isn't so much in the fact that PostgreSQL, Inc
> > > is doing a couple of modest closed-source things with the code. After
> > > all, the PG community has long ackn
Okay, since I haven't gotten word back on where to find the docs for v7.1,
it still contains those for v7.0, but I just put up beta1 tarballs in the
/pub/dev directory ... can someone take a look at these before we announce
them to make sure they look okay?
Marc G. Fournier IC
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2000 16:48, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Okay, since I haven't gotten word back on where to find the docs for v7.1,
> > it still contains those for v7.0, but I just put up beta1 tarballs in the
> >
101 - 200 of 510 matches
Mail list logo
