Re: [Pharo-dev] Magritte = Auto-GT Presentation

Tudor Girba-2 wrote > You get a GLMMagrittePresentation and if you want to use it in the > inspector, you have to define your own extension that uses it. I'm sorry, I'm still not understanding... I only know how to hook into the inspector via . How does that relate to GLMMagrittePresentation? How

[Pharo-dev] Can't Log In to CI

Did something change in the last 12 hours? - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Can-t-Log-In-to-CI-tp4819109.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Jenkins Not Compiling Launcher Chapter`

Sean, I think you have to add PharoLauncherTutorial pillar file to the inputFiles section of 'pillar.conf', for it to generate the pdf. On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoBookWorkInProgress/22/artifact/PharoLauncherTuto

Re: [Pharo-dev] Problem with asClass usage

Hi, To make it easier to refactor these places, here is how to find asClass usages with GTSpotter: http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/finding-asclass-usages-in-glamour-using-gtspotter :) Cheers, Doru On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:32 PM, stepharo wrote: > Hi > > We want to raise a strong warni

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

Le 11 avr. 2015 14:32, "Clément Bera" a écrit : > > > > 2015-04-11 1:10 GMT-07:00 Nicolai Hess : > >> >> >> 2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera : >>> >>> Well I guess I used to click proceed and not close the debugger... >> >> >> >> I don't know who is working on the breakpoint support and I d

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

>From the perspective of a TestCase... * "running" a test wraps execution in error handling so it can log errors without TestRunner breaking open a debugger. * "debugging" executes without that error handling so an error breaks open a debugger. The functionality required is that a debugger opens i

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

> On 11 Apr 2015, at 21:31, Ben Coman wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Ben Coman > wrote: > Returning to build 40486 which exhibits the freeze, as a first step, why > don't we replace all that complicated stack manipulation stuff with... > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

> On 11 Apr 2015, at 21:07, Ben Coman wrote: > > Returning to build 40486 which exhibits the freeze, as a first step, why > don't we replace all that complicated stack manipulation stuff with... > > NautilusUI>>debugTest: aMethod > [ aMethod methodClass debug: aMethod selector

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Ben Coman wrote: > Returning to build 40486 which exhibits the freeze, as a first step, why > don't we replace all that complicated stack manipulation stuff with... > > NautilusUI>>debugTest: aMethod > [ aMethod methodClass debug: aMethod selector ] fork. > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

Returning to build 40486 which exhibits the freeze, as a first step, why don't we replace all that complicated stack manipulation stuff with... NautilusUI>>debugTest: aMethod [ aMethod methodClass debug: aMethod selector ] fork. cheers -ben On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Clément Bera wro

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

Peter Uhnák wrote > it should be written on the > download page - so new debian people can decide what to choose and why > they > should choose one or the other. Agreed, I've updated https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-workingRoadmaps/blob/master/DownloadInstructions.md to split GNU/Linux into

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

Peter Uhnák wrote > (especially considering the build is 6 months old and unlike pharo-vm > master branch I > don't see any newer version). I'm assuming it's only building the stable VM, which was last updated 9/26, so that explains its age. Peter Uhnák wrote > why is there a separate zeroconf f

[Pharo-dev] Jenkins Not Compiling Launcher Chapter`

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoBookWorkInProgress/22/artifact/PharoLauncherTutorial/ only contains the .pillar file - no html, pdf, etc. Anyone know why? I nosed through the config, build script, and console output but didn't see anything obvious. Thanks. - Cheers, Sean --

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras < vonbecm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, >here is the announcement > > http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/2014-September/100911.html > Yeah, this is exactly what I had in mind; it should be written on the down

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

Apologies. The link to the tutorial is : https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/PharoInProgress/tree/master/PharoLauncherTutorial . On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jigyasa Grover wrote: > As discussed, a tutorial for Pharo Launcher ( > https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/PharoInProg

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

As discussed, a tutorial for Pharo Launcher ( https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/PharoInProgress/pull/5) has been included in Pharo In Progress under the guidance of Mr. Sean DeNigris. Kindly review it and post in your suggestions/comments. Thanks Jigyasa Grover On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

Peter, here is the announcement http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/2014-September/100911.html made by Jan Vrany. you can ask him. On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras < > vonbecm...@gmail.

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

2015-04-11 1:10 GMT-07:00 Nicolai Hess : > > > 2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera : > >> Well I guess I used to click proceed and not close the debugger... >> > > > I don't know who is working on the breakpoint support and I don't know how > long it will take. > Maybe we can fix thie image fr

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus: Why is Search Field Pre-filled?

There are at least three competing approaches: 1. "browse full" Since this is basically copying the original nautilus, this should preserve the filter of the original nautilus 2. "new nautilus" (from shortcut/world) This is more up to user preference, because sometimes you want to preserve it, an

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus: Why is Search Field Pre-filled?

stepharo wrote > we could have a plus/pin button that logs the previous search. That sounds good or a search history because continuing with the same package set is only one use case and I feel this gets in my way although maybe I'll get used to it - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in con

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

+1 On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Max Leske wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2015, at 10:10, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > > 2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera : > >> Well I guess I used to click proceed and not close the debugger... >> > > > I don't know who is working on the breakpoint support and I d

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

I miss it. I think I remember that a would work, so a hack fix could be the do a restart when the close button is pushed. Reintroducing it with the problem fixed would be welcome. cheers -ben On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > 2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera :

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

> On 11 Apr 2015, at 10:10, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > > 2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera >: > Well I guess I used to click proceed and not close the debugger... > > > I don't know who is working on the breakpoint support and I don't know how > long it

Re: [Pharo-dev] Problem during the loading of setting on Pharo 4

Hi, This is because you exported all your settings previously and in the meantime, this particular setter has changed to cacheDirectory:. This is a systematic problem with the current setting mechanism and we will have to deal with it after the Pharo 4 release. To circumvent the problem for now, I

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus: Why is Search Field Pre-filled?

> > It is considered as a feature :) >> (14634 Package Filter in >> Nautilus should use the last used filter when a new window is opened) >> > I think this also answers Sean's original question. Peter (note to self: do not use reply-to-all; sorry Nico

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus: Why is Search Field Pre-filled?

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > 2015-04-11 9:27 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák : > >> I think there is a problem with it... >> if I browse a class with shortcut "ctrl+b", then the name of the package >> where the class is is added to the search. >> This at least to me quite ann

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus: Why is Search Field Pre-filled?

2015-04-11 9:27 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák : > I think there is a problem with it... > if I browse a class with shortcut "ctrl+b", then the name of the package > where the class is is added to the search. > This at least to me quite annoying as I often do lookups of other classes > but I am not interes

Re: [Pharo-dev] why we removed debugTest from nautilus?

2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera : > Well I guess I used to click proceed and not close the debugger... > I don't know who is working on the breakpoint support and I don't know how long it will take. Maybe we can fix thie image freeze and re-include the debugtest code until the new breakp

Re: [Pharo-dev] Problem with asClass usage

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Ben Coman wrote > > I believe #asClass itself was introduced for a use case to simplify > > Workspace "user interactive" Gofer scripts to retrieve and load > > Configurations. > > Yes. But it's no longer necessary due to... > > > Ben Coma

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras < vonbecm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, > The latest vm (http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo/linux/latest.zip) in > debian wheezy gives you the already know problem > > /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: *version `GLIBC_2.15' not foun

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus: Why is Search Field Pre-filled?

I think there is a problem with it... if I browse a class with shortcut "ctrl+b", then the name of the package where the class is is added to the search. This at least to me quite annoying as I often do lookups of other classes but I am not interested in the whole package... so every so often I hav