Hello
In the thread 'including Pillar in Pharo image by default' it was
suggested by Stephane Ducasse to include a subset of Pillar in the
Pharo image[1] .
I'd like to extend that proposal a little bit it in order to do very
simple presentations. This should allow to describe at least part of
th
A note:
Tudor Girba wrote:
Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:31 PM
Reply-To: Any question about pharo is welcome
To: Any question about pharo is welcome
Hi,
As mentioned in an announcement about 10 days ago, we are building a
Pillar editor with inline viewing abilities in Bloc. Here is how it
looked li
Hi,
As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) for
Pillar working on top of Bloc.
You can get it by loading:
Iceberg enableMetacelloIntegration: true.
Metacello new
baseline: 'GToolkit';
repository: 'github://feenkcom/gtoolkit/src';
load.
For example, you c
Ok let know.
Guille worked the complete week on pillar (mainly archetype and the
outputer part) and made **giant** steps.
He removed most of the need for using make and we will do another
cleaning first but first
release Pharo 7.0.0 and its documentation.
After we will remove magritte.
Stef
On F
Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) for
> Pillar working on top of Bloc.
Two questions after playing with it:
1. Can one save a live-edited file?
2. Is it possible to make the markup codes invisible? That would seem more
appropriate e.g. in
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Sean P. DeNigris
wrote:
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> > As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor)
> for
> > Pillar working on top of Bloc.
>
> Two questions after playing with it:
> 1. Can one save a live-edited file?
> 2. Is it possible to
Hi,
> On Nov 10, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
>> As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) for
>> Pillar working on top of Bloc.
>
> Two questions after playing with it:
> 1. Can one save a live-edited file?
The saving action i
Hannes
We will start to repackage pillar model so finding a mini pillar is
interesting to us.
Let let us know.
Stef
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> On Nov 10, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>>
>> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
>>> As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter
Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> That would be another renderer, but it is not difficult to build. That is
> something we’ll do soon.
It would be nice to be able to toggle codes on/off like WS Word
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
Sean why don't you try because this is the moment to push bloc people
to produce simpler better solution.
I should do it too. I know.
Stef
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
>> That would be another renderer, but it is not difficult to build. That is
>
I have been just trying to install GT Documenter and is really
frustrating (I have been unable to install it even for the first time!).
This was the list of errors I got and steps I followed, in almost
sequential order, just to get a (bittersweet!) taste of GT Documenter:
* 1st: LGit_GIT_ERROR:
On 14/11/17 10:36, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
[...]
> I have thought that Git is overcomplicated for most of the developers'
> tasks and communities. I don't know if the root of previous issues is
> in the "Iceberg enableMetacelloIntegration: true" line, but having to
> get your pair o
Hi Offray,
There are two issues that I take from your email. So, please allow me to
address them separately:
1. The process of installing the new GT (with Documenter)
GT is meant to load in Pharo 6.1. It is tested tested automatically several
times a day both on Windows (Appveyor) and on Linux
What operating system are you on? What version of Pharo do you use? Is it 32b
or 64b?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Nov 14, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 14/11/17 10:36, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I have thought that Git is overcomplicated
Hi Offray,
I understand your frustration, but with all respect, the fact that you have
problems with Iceberg does not mean that GT Documenter or any other GT tool
is responsible for described problems.
Most complains about bloc, brick, whatever is because of unrelated stuff.
It is a little bit di
For git / iceberg first time users:
Please read the tip and tricks booklet available on http://books.pharo.org
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Aliaksei Syrel wrote:
> Hi Offray,
>
> I understand your frustration, but with all respect, the fact that you have
> problems with Iceberg does not mean
Hi Doru,
On 14/11/17 11:36, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Offray,
>
> There are two issues that I take from your email. So, please allow me to
> address them separately:
>
> 1. The process of installing the new GT (with Documenter)
> GT is meant to load in Pharo 6.1. It is tested tested automatically
Alex,
I understand that frustration on installation could be motivated by
other issues instead of GT Documenter, but if the team ask to use
"|Iceberg enableMetacelloIntegration: true." |in the project readme,
where it also says that is supported for Pharo 6.1 and 7.0, is natural
to think that some
Hi,
We changed the baseline to not require Moz2D on Linux. Could you please try
again?
I also updated the README.
Cheers,
Doru
> On Nov 14, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
> wrote:
>
> Alex,
> I understand that frustration on installation could be motivated by other
> issu
Hi Offray,
I agree with your point of view. It is in our best interests to make it
work as smoothly as possible, ideally automagically :)
Now I will try to install Pharo6.1 on Manjaro Linux in order to see if
there is something that needs to be noted in README.md.
One of the biggest problems on l
Offray, which edition of Manjaro do you have? (XFCE, KDE or Gnome)
Cheers,
Alex
On 14 November 2017 at 18:41, Aliaksei Syrel wrote:
> Hi Offray,
>
> I agree with your point of view. It is in our best interests to make it
> work as smoothly as possible, ideally automagically :)
> Now I will try
Thanks both, Alex and Doru for your quick answers. I'm using Manjaro
Cinnamon Edition[1]. If you need any help with 32 bits over 64 bits
systems, let me know.
[1] https://manjaro.org/community-editions/
Cheers,
Offray
On 14/11/17 12:46, Aliaksei Syrel wrote:
> Offray, which edition of Manjaro
Hi,
The readme is clearer now about Iceberg integration as an option not as
prerequisite. Installation works, but Pillar preview tab is grey and
clicking on it rises: "Instance of FFIExternalResourceManager class did
not understand #removeResource:". Also the syntax highlighting in the
(plain) Pil
23 matches
Mail list logo