On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:29:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I have the following configuration for passing email to OpenDKIM for
> > processing:
> >
> > [127.0.0.1]:10030 inet n - n - - smtpd
> > -o local_recipient_maps=
> > -o virtual_mailbox_maps=
> > -o virtual_alias_maps=
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> I have the following configuration for passing email to OpenDKIM for
> processing:
>
> [127.0.0.1]:10030 inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o local_recipient_maps=
> -o virtual_mailbox_maps=
> -o virtual_alias_maps=
> -o relay_recipient_maps=
> -o smtpd_restriction
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:48 PM, rob...@chalmers.com.au <
rob...@chalmers.com.au> wrote:
> Interesting article Steve. What happens when/if they change ip blocks in
> between cron runs?
> and I can't help thinking this may be a little redundant though, with spf,
> dkim and dmarc in place the source
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> Maintaining a local postscreen whitelist of well-known providers is
> largely obsolete.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_sites
>
> a mini
If wishes were horses. ;-)
My xyz domain is on the VPS. I'm going to switch systems in a few days.
Original Message
From: Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 2:45 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Reply To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on Postscreen Whitelist Ar
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:29:45PM -0800, yahoogro...@lazygranch.xyz wrote:
>�Regarding Spamhaus, I am periodically blacklisted on my hosted Web service
> provider because somebody �sets up an account on the same service, then
> spews spam. Because I share the same IP, I'm declared toxic.
Sounds
Regarding Spamhaus, I am periodically blacklisted on my hosted Web service
provider because somebody sets up an account on the same service, then spews
spam. Because I share the same IP, I'm declared toxic.
I have set up a VPS, which of course has its own IP, not to get in this boat.
But I a
I have the following configuration for passing email to OpenDKIM for
processing:
[127.0.0.1]:10030 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o local_recipient_maps=
-o virtual_mailbox_maps=
-o virtual_alias_maps=
-o relay_recipient_maps=
-o smtpd_restriction_classes=
-o smtpd_delay_reject=no
-o
On 11/23/2015 3:48 PM, rob...@chalmers.com.au wrote:
> Interesting article Steve. What happens when/if they change ip
> blocks in between cron runs?
> and I can't help thinking this may be a little redundant though,
> with spf, dkim and dmarc in place the source of the email is checked
> and acted
Interesting article Steve. What happens when/if they change ip blocks in
between cron runs?
and I can't help thinking this may be a little redundant though, with spf, dkim
and dmarc in place the source of the email is checked and acted upon
accordingly.
Sent from my iPad
> On 23 Nov 2015,
On 11/23/2015 1:42 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> I just posted an article about how to whitelist Gmail and
> Hotmail/Outlook.com IP addresses for Postscreen, based on the
> webmaster's SPF records:
>
> http://www.stevejenkins.com/blog/2015/11/postscreen-whitelisting-smtp-outbound-ip-addresses-large-w
I just posted an article about how to whitelist Gmail and
Hotmail/Outlook.com IP addresses for Postscreen, based on the webmaster's
SPF records:
http://www.stevejenkins.com/blog/2015/11/postscreen-whitelisting-smtp-outbound-ip-addresses-large-webmail-providers/
I'd appreciate feedback from anyone
* Mufit Eribol :
>
> On 23.11.2015 00:16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 09:43:46PM +0200, Mufit Eribol wrote:
> >
> >>I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
> >>problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
> >>telnetting to
On 23 Nov 2015, at 1:58, Mufit Eribol wrote:
Viktor, thank you for your check.I am relieved.
I realized that the related switch is
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
If it is changed to "no", then "AUTH PLAIN LOGIN" is also advertised.
You should understand what that does, since it is potentially ve
Vicki Brown:
> How many times do I need to say that /etc/postfix IS postfix.
You can either remove the symlink "/usr/local/cutedge/postfix/etc"
or you can add a configuration setting "alternate_config_directories
= /usr/local/cutedge/postfix/etc".
See email below for more. I have nothing to add t
> On Nov 22, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2015 05:51 PM, Vicki Brown wrote:
>> Also, from my discussion with him, Bernard Teo does seem to know what he's
>> doing.
>
> I suggest you type "man postfix", scroll down to the bottom and look at
> the list of authors, then compare th
16 matches
Mail list logo