Like I said, this code works just fine in IE, but in Chrome, it does
not work.
>$aEle = $('TicketOptions').getElementsByClassName('LoadChecks');
>$aEle.each(function($s){
>if($s != $sEle) $s.checked = false;
>});
No error in the browser, but the JS debugg
See my comments below. - Ken Snyder
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:17 PM, laurin1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> I'm sorry. My brain is fried, it works on arrays with simple values,
> but not arrays with Objects IN them. Mispoke.
>
> For instance, in IE and in Chrome, this works fine:
>
>$a = n
On Nov 14, 4:17 pm, laurin1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry. My brain is fried, it works on arrays with simple values,
> but not arrays with Objects IN them. Mispoke.
>
> For instance, in IE and in Chrome, this works fine:
>
> $a = new Object();
>
> $a['testme1'] = 'tested1'
On Nov 14, 7:03 pm, Namotco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, should be:
>
> eval("someVar=function() { this.elm=$('outputs'); }; s=new
> someVar(); s.innerHTML='test';");
Omitting `var` is generally a bad idea. Either use `var` or assign to
a property directly (as in `window.foo = 'bar'
On Nov 14, 11:52 am, Abel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This solution. Is it for same-named form controls? My solution doesn't
> have same-named controls.
>
> So with this i can send the return from mergeForms... as my
> parameters, right?
Yes. Just pass it as many forms as you need.
[
Sorry, should be:
eval("someVar=function() { this.elm=$('outputs');}; s=new
someVar(); s.innerHTML='test';");
alert($('outputs').innerHTML);
// not 'test'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
On Nov 15, 6:18 am, "Hector Virgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, TJ. That's a really good point, but unfortunately many of our
> clients use old Macs with IE 5.5. I would still like to provide them with
> some basic Javascript UI enhancements. Does that mean I would have to write
> nativ
Interesting, I've never done that before. What about this:
eval("someVar=function() { this.elm=$('getElm');
this.elm.innerHTML='test'; };");
alert($('getElm').innerHTML);
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Thanks, now that there is a working link, others may actually be able
to get to it. ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototyp
i think googlecode is fine, i'm just saying that the svn repos is a bit
messed up
this link does not work
http://scriptaculous-portal-extender.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/scriptaculous-portal-extender-read-only
this link does
http://scriptaculous-portal-extender.googlecode.com/svn/trunk%20scriptacu
I'm sorry. My brain is fried, it works on arrays with simple values,
but not arrays with Objects IN them. Mispoke.
For instance, in IE and in Chrome, this works fine:
$a = new Object();
$a['testme1'] = 'tested1';
$a['testme2'] = 'tested2';
$a['testme3'] = 'tested
I asked for info on where it would be best to collaborate on this and
no one offered any suggestions. What/where do you suggest?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To
thats my point each is an array ittrerator no ?
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/array/each
- Original Message -
From: "laurin1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:56 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Chrome, Object
It works fine on arrays, if that is what you are asking.
On Nov 14, 2:39 pm, "Alex Mcauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> each does an array itterator no ?
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "laurin1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2
each does an array itterator no ?
- Original Message -
From: "laurin1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:29 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Chrome, Object and each()
>
> Apparently, this does not work? I get this error message when I tr
Apparently, this does not work? I get this error message when I try
it:
uncaught exception TypeError: Object # has no method 'each'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
Thanks, TJ. That's a really good point, but unfortunately many of our
clients use old Macs with IE 5.5. I would still like to provide them with
some basic Javascript UI enhancements. Does that mean I would have to write
native Javascript for them?
-Hector
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:31 AM, T.J. Cro
hate to be a downer, but yer SVN repos is a bit hokey...
just an FYI
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:37 PM, disccomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Update:
> Setup the project at
> http://code.google.com/p/scriptaculous-portal-extender/
> ( svn checkout
> http://scriptaculous-portal-extender.googlec
Of course, you'd save yourself all of this trouble by using event
delegation[1]. :)
Best,
Tobie
[1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/faq#delegation
On Nov 14, 2:04 pm, bluezehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep cheers T.J. This all makes alot of sense. Nice to understand
> everything rather tha
Update:
Setup the project at http://code.google.com/p/scriptaculous-portal-extender/
( svn checkout http://scriptaculous-portal-extender.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
scriptaculous-portal-extender-read-only )
An example page is provided. Counter intuitively it works as expected
under IE 7 & 8. But no
This solution. Is it for same-named form controls? My solution doesn't
have same-named controls.
So with this i can send the return from mergeForms... as my
parameters, right?
On Nov 13, 5:26 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 11:13 am, Abel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
Hi,
> Does anyone know if IE 5.5 for the Mac is supported?
IE 5.5 for the Mac isn't even supported by Microsoft. :-) They EOL'd
it a couple of years ago.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 14, 4:08 pm, "Hector Virgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I didn't see that. I wa
Thanks, I didn't see that. I was looking for a link on the homepage.
Does anyone know if IE 5.5 for the Mac is supported?
-Hector
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:12 AM, T.J. Crowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The list on the download page[1] is up-to-date, isn't it? If any
> knows that th
Ah, That is much cleaner. Thank you.
On Nov 13, 6:18 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 3:43 pm, Diodeus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I've been dynamically building a slideshow based on a list of image
> > filenames. I use the following code to create thumbnails:
>
> > $('
Thanks. It works. The problem is solved ;-)
On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, "Mona Remlawi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alann,
>
> I believe the problem is that you are using the variable name to be
> the same as the ID of the element.
> IE tends to support referencing an element with its ID.
> Ex:
>
>
Yes. You are right, I'm using the same ID in different elements. I'll
check your method. tnx.
On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, "Mona Remlawi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alann,
>
> I believe the problem is that you are using the variable name to be
> the same as the ID of the element.
> IE tends to suppo
Yep cheers T.J. This all makes alot of sense. Nice to understand
everything rather than just go about doing things in a certain way
because it's the "done" thing!
On Nov 14, 11:02 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > My tactic is going to be to stop defining them inline, ther
sorry my original code was wrong ..
http://pastie.org/314784
The code above actually says 2 requests when there should only be 1 !!!
Here is a better example i cant recreate the problem entirely as it
needs a few periodical updaters to be going on in the background but
when they are
here is a pastie of the test i ran in Firefox at least
http://pastie.org/314776
Regards
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders
Hi,
sure, i will do it now
- Original Message -
From: "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders
Hi,
> When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method
> onComp
Hi,
The list on the download page[1] is up-to-date, isn't it? If any
knows that that information is inaccurate, please raise a ticket in
Lighthouse[1] with the details (including how you know!) and I'll fix
it post haste.
[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/download
[2] http://www.prototypejs.org/co
Hi,
> When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method
> onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from
> the Ajax.Responders counter
Can you put together a small, self-contained test page demonstrating
the issue, post it to Pastie[1], and link to it f
I've also seen this "bug", it's producing a warning in firefox-console
if config is set to javascript.options.strict == true;
Also jslint produces a "Expected a conditional expression and instead
saw an assignment"-warning for this.
this is not very nice style, in my opinion, but it works.
On Nov
Just to let everyone know i may have found a little bug in the
Ajax.Responders .. or maybe it is mean to to this way
When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method
onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from
the Ajax.Responders counter
If you don
http://prototypejs.org/api/ajax/updater
Read the section on evalScripts .. it explains a little bit about this kind
of thing
Regards
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Ehsun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:32 AM
Subject: [Proto-
Hi,
> My tactic is going to be to stop defining them inline, therefore not
> causing a closure...
Yeah, I mean, it's not something you need to be paranoid about at all,
just something to keep in the back of your mind when you're dealing
with large numbers of things. Small numbers of things are
Thanks T.J., very useful.
I'm defining a lot of closures for my event handlers, ie, defining the
functions for them inline (element.observe('click', function() { bla
bla bla });), which are probably therefore using far too much memory.
My tactic is going to be to stop defining them inline, therefo
On Nov 14, 3:45 am, Robert Zotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ehsun,
>
> Can you post some code so we can get a better understanding of what
> you are trying to accomplish.
>
> Off the top of my head though it sounds like you may want to look into
> scope
> binding.http://www.prototypejs.org/api
On Nov 14, 6:30 am, RobG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 7:39 am, Ehsun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've create an Object in my pages script tags, something like this:
>
> > a = new A();
>
> > and when I want to call a method of a in the script which is actually
> > the ajax content
Hi Alann,
I believe the problem is that you are using the variable name to be
the same as the ID of the element.
IE tends to support referencing an element with its ID.
Ex:
then 'bla' would refer to div#bla element.
Now back to your example, do you have multiple elements?
That will cause IE to
Hi Jan-erik,
You need to initialize your global counter to 0 so that counter+1
would increment correctly.
Also you need to move myAjax to be a global variable, to be able to
access myAjax.stop()
--
mona
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:56 AM, jeaswe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How
I find out this solution too. I think returning value is not an
important thing!
What is the current mechanism of eval() right now?
On Nov 14, 6:56 am, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 10:30 pm, RobG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 14, 7:39 am, Ehsun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
How do I apply a stop to a running periodic updater?
The below does not stop it!
var counter;
function periodic()
{
var myAjax = new Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater
('meny','../TJx/meny.php'+'?rand='+new Date().getTime(),{method:
'post',frequency:10.0,decay:2, onSuccess: function(t
Not works for me too ;-(
$$('div.number').each(function (node) {
var edit = node.select('a#edit')[0];
if( edit ) {
...
}
});
It works in Firefox and Safari and NOT works in IE ;-(
On Nov 14, 12:29 am, "Gabriel Gilini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:17
44 matches
Mail list logo
