Hi,
http://www.slideshare.net/johandw/20140408-tdd-puppetcampparis
Comments are welcome
Grts
Johan
--
Johan De Wit
Open Source Consultant
Red Hat Certified Engineer (805008667232363)
Puppet Certified Professional 2013/2014 (PCP006)
Ha.
Snap.
A talk I gave at Puppetcamp London:
https://speakerdeck.com/garethr/test-driven-development-for-puppet
And another talk from Loaddays by Garrett:
http://www.slideshare.net/gh/20140406-loa-daystddwithpuppettutorial
That's three talks with the same title in less than a week. I believe
w
And add another one to the list. Well, i did the same talk for the
Berlin Puppet User Group, as the one I did in Paris.
I still am so surprised when asking who is doing some kind of 'testing',
almost nobody raises is hand .
Most people just don't' see the sense of doing rspec unit tests
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 11:57:19 AM UTC+2, Johan De Wit wrote:
>
> I still am so surprised when asking who is doing some kind of 'testing',
> almost nobody raises is hand .
>
> Most people just don't' see the sense of doing rspec unit tests - why
> writing the same code twice ?
>
> Well,
Hey Alexander,
you could also check out serverspec[1] for acceptance tests. It provides
simple RSpec tests for your server with a lot of puppet-like matchers, but
it's not tied to Puppet (heresy! :). We use it to validate our modules and
are very happy with it.
Sven
[1] http://serverspec.org/
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 07:05:49AM -0700, Alexander Fortin wrote:
> On Sunday, April 13, 2014 11:57:19 AM UTC+2, Johan De Wit wrote:
> >
> > I still am so surprised when asking who is doing some kind of 'testing',
> > almost nobody raises is hand .
> >
> > Most people just don't' see the sens
On 04/15/2014 09:25 AM, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> I haven't used catalog-diff but I
> am suspecting that it might be a substitute for the rspec tests. Tell me
No. rspec allows you to implement unit tests to catch certain regression
bugs. catalog-diff is rather concerned with integration testing
(alth
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:10:05 PM UTC+2, Felix.Frank wrote:
>
> On 04/15/2014 09:25 AM, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> > I haven't used catalog-diff but I
> > am suspecting that it might be a substitute for the rspec tests. Tell me
>
> No. rspec allows you to implement unit tests to catch certain re
Great having a discussion on testing.
I have to reread all your comments, having a busy week catching up with
work after a week of having fun at all the puppetcamps.
I keep on tracking this thread, and will add my thoughts soon.
Thanks for all your comments'
Johan
On 15/04/14 15:46, Alexan
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 06:46:21AM -0700, Alexander Fortin wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:10:05 PM UTC+2, Felix.Frank wrote:
> >
> > On 04/15/2014 09:25 AM, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> > > I haven't used catalog-diff but I
> > > am suspecting that it might be a substitute for the rspec tests. T
On 04/17/2014 09:06 AM, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> Of course we want to start using beaker for those kind of tests so we
> don't push crap on the bear metal(although it is not metal most of the
> time)
...but usually just bears. ;-D
(Yeah I know. Sorry. It is just such a cute typo that I couldn't res
:D. Too fast for da bears.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:46:18AM +0200, Felix Frank wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 09:06 AM, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> > Of course we want to start using beaker for those kind of tests so we
> > don't push crap on the bear metal(although it is not metal most of the
> > time)
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
