[pygtk] Re: Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel

2000-04-26 Thread James Henstridge
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 'configure' script needs updating: arrayobject.h now is included as #include Numeric/arrayobject.h Well, the numeric python features for the extension class based pygtk are not implemented yet, but I should fix this. Are you planning to

Re: [pygtk] Re: Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel

2000-04-26 Thread Joseph VanAndel
James Henstridge wrote: Are you planning to proceed with this approach? If I wanted to wrap gtk+extra-0.99.5, is using the Extension class approach a good idea? Yes. After figuring out some of the bugs, it looks like using ExtensionClass is the way to go. I am slowly converting

Re: [pygtk] Re: Non-member submission from Joe Van Andel

2000-04-26 Thread James Henstridge
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Joseph VanAndel wrote: So, if I need to wrap gtk+extra now, should I just use SWIG, but plan on using ExtensionClass later? If all you want to do is use the GtkExtra widget library with python, go to: http://home.pages.de/~voegele/gtkextra.html (this link is in the