Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 21/07/2012 00:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, com
On 03/08/2012 13:50, Alex Strickland wrote:
On 2012/07/21 11:49 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
and PS is spelt p.s. :)
Ahem, the absolutely authoritative reference on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postscript
says PS or P.S.
I'm sorry but you can't read my writing[1].
[1] another Py
On 2012/07/21 11:49 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
and PS is spelt p.s. :)
Ahem, the absolutely authoritative reference on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postscript
says PS or P.S.
--
Regards
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 21/07/2012 00:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welco
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
I'll support 3.3+, but not with the same code base: I want to use all the
cool features that 3.3 has! :)
The trouble with double-codebasing is that you have double
maintenance. But sure. So long as your time isn't un
Ethan Furman wrote:
Alex Strickland wrote:
"Not supported: index files":
I have been using http://sourceforge.net/projects/harbour-project/ for
years where a guy called Przemyslaw Czerpak has written an absolutely
bullet proof implementation of NTX and CDX for DBF. Maybe it will
interest you
Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
"No
On 21/07/2012 21:57, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kud
Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
"Not supported: index files
On 21/07/12 05:26, Ethan Furman wrote:
dbf (also known as python dbase) is a module for reading/writing
dBase III, FP, VFP, and soon Clipper, .dbf database files. It's
an ancient format that still finds lots of use.
Other than the caring for the ancient legacy data, it is still widely
used in
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> I'll support 3.3+, but not with the same code base: I want to use all the
> cool features that 3.3 has! :)
The trouble with double-codebasing is that you have double
maintenance. But sure. So long as your time isn't under great
pressure, it
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Works with CPython 2.4 - 2.7. (Tested)
Have you considered supporting 3.2/3.3 at all? It's often not
difficult to make your code compatible with both. Or is there some
dependency that is locked to 2.X?
I'll support 3
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Works with CPython 2.4 - 2.7. (Tested)
Have you considered supporting 3.2/3.3 at all? It's often not
difficult to make your code compatible with both. Or is there some
dependency that is locked to 2.X?
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailm
Simon Cropper wrote:
Question 1 - What version of VFP will dbf work with? Is VFP9 OK?
As long as you don't use auto-incrementing fields nor varchar fields
you'll be fine.
Question 2 - You statement of compatibility is unclear.
Works with CPython 2.4 - 2.7. (Tested)
Works with PyPy 1.8.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
This mailing list is about helping our fellow Python developers improve
their skills and solve problems. That doesn't just mean *coding*
problems, it also means helping them to write better documentation and
promote their software better.
Indeed it is, and your reminder
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> Unless the software is so well-known that everybody knows what it is...
I've yet to meet ANY piece of software that's like that. Even with
releases of CPython (arguably the primary point of this list) it
wouldn't hurt to give an explanatio
On 21 Jul 2012 03:34:44 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>tl;dr
Easy there, tiger. No need to get riled up over a single nitpick over
phrasing.
~Temia
--
Invective! Verb your expletive nouns!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:30:40 +1000, Simon Cropper wrote:
> Works with PyPy, OK.
>
> Hopefully works with other implementations, Hm, what does this mean?
I guess that Ethan means that his library definitely works with PyPy and
CPython, because he has tested it on those, and that he expects that
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:59:21 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Excellent! That's fantastic news! I've been waiting for a stable release
of dbf for months! I just have one question.
What is dbf?
:)
dbf (also known as python dbase) is a
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:02:55 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Temia Eszteri
>wrote:
>> On 21 Jul 2012 00:50:13 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as wel
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:56:59 -0700, Temia Eszteri wrote:
>>I don't generally click on arbitrary links to find out whether or not
>>the link is something that interests me enough to click on it.
>
> Can't really call a cheese shop link arbitrary. It's in the best place
> it could be for providing
On 21/07/12 09:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Temia Eszteri wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2012 00:50:13 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
>>> Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
>>> hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
>>>
>>> Get your copy at http://python.org
On 21 Jul 2012 00:50:13 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>> Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
>> hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
>>
>> Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
>
>I don't generally click on arbitrary links to find
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:59:21 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Getting closer to a stable release.
Excellent! That's fantastic news! I've been waiting for a stable release
of dbf for months! I just have one question.
What is dbf?
> Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.o
26 matches
Mail list logo