At 13:06 10/12/2003, you wrote:
It was a fairly simple question that would have been shorter than what you
wrote
It was a simple question, yes, but born out of laziness primarily. Every
single one of us posts questions out of _ignorance_, so you're excused on
that count. But had you only done a s
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 14:06, Brian wrote:
> It was a fairly simple question that would have been shorter than what you
> wrote
>
> Brian
>
Please don't top post.
This is a REALLY busy list, and the norm here is to at least try to find
a solution. especially to a question that has been discu
It was a fairly simple question that would have been shorter than what you
wrote
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: red hat 10 release date
> On Sun, O
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:27:41AM -0400, Brian wrote:
>
> Just resubscribed to the list.
> What is the release date for redhat linux 10
Please read the archives and search Red Hat's web site before posting.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community
Just resubscribed to the list.
What is the release date for redhat linux 10
Thanks
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
As a debian and Redhat users I have 2 main comments.
Debian seems so much faster, even on slower hardware. Do other people
thing that Redhat seems to be less optimized? I am just a linux newbie
myself but the speed is very noticable.
Apt. Apt-get just works so well. Automagically resolving de
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 21:28, Michael Mansour wrote:
> I remember when the FUD about Red Hat occured that
> time, and remember that it was mentioned that
> Motorola, owning a sizeable share of Red Hat, won
> itself a seat on Red Hat's board. And who owns
> Motorola? you guessed it, Microsoft...
W
> > Allow me to suggest, gentlemen, that this list
> already gets enough traffic
> > and that "the feeling of Debian to a Red Hat user"
> is a thread that really
> > is rather off-topic and likely one in which the
> majority of listmembers
> > won't be interested. Perhaps you'd be kind enough
> to
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Allow me to suggest, gentlemen, that this list already gets enough traffic
> and that "the feeling of Debian to a Red Hat user" is a thread that really
> is rather off-topic and likely one in which the majority of listmembers
> won't be interested. Per
At 08:31 10/10/2003, you wrote:
Le 06/10/2003 02:32, « Jim Hayward » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> P.S. I'm typing this out on a Debian install I did 1 1/2 weeks ago.
*** So how does that feel to a RH user? I would like to know [...]
What's your experience?
--
Cheers,
Zoran.
Allow me to suggest
Le 06/10/2003 02:32, « Jim Hayward » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> P.S. I'm typing this out on a Debian install I did 1 1/2 weeks ago.
*** So how does that feel to a RH user? I would like to know because
there're things bothering me about RH since a long time so I'm trying to
switch to Debia
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:43:27PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Named as a caching nameserver is something I wish were included. No, it
> doesn't really belong in a standard workstation, but for those of using it
> as a SOHO single workstation/server it'd be great. As just a bit more idle
> s
At 20:48 10/5/2003, you wrote:
It's not missing all of the server applications, even if it's identical
to RHEL WS. Here's the list of server apps that I took from the taroon beta:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ewilts]$ grep server up2date.showall.ws
mysql-server-3.23.58-1.i386
openssh-server-3.6.1p2-18.i386
r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:33:14 -0400 (EDT), Gerry Doris wrote:
> http://www.redhat.com/software/workstation/
> I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong but the workstation version is NOT
> equal to the old Redhat Linux. It sounds like the WS version is
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 10:33:14PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
> I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong but the workstation version is NOT
> equal to the old Redhat Linux. It sounds like the WS version is missing
> all of the server functionality that was in RHL. It also costs $179USD
> which seem
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:32:38PM -0700, Jim Hayward wrote:
>> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 15:14, Jeff Wimmer wrote:
>> > So RedHat is dropping the "end user" version and concentrating on
>> > commercial enterprise based products? Is that what I'm understanding
>> here?
>>
>> Correct. They are dropp
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:32:38PM -0700, Jim Hayward wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 15:14, Jeff Wimmer wrote:
> > So RedHat is dropping the "end user" version and concentrating on
> > commercial enterprise based products? Is that what I'm understanding here?
>
> Correct. They are dropping the "
You think in the long run Fedora will actually get off
the ground like Red Hat Linux did?
I'm very sceptic about Red Hat's move and although can
understand why Red Hat would do such a thing, don't
agree with it as it directly affects me and my use of
Linux.
Maybe for the long term it'll be time
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 15:14, Jeff Wimmer wrote:
> So RedHat is dropping the "end user" version and concentrating on
> commercial enterprise based products? Is that what I'm understanding here?
Correct. They are dropping the "end user/consumer" version for the
Fedora Project. The only RH "product
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 14:18, Joe Szilagyi wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know what it is? Thanks.
There is no longer and will never be a Red Hat 10. The consumer version
of Red Hat Linux essentially no longer exists. It has been replaced by
"Fedora Linux Project". The first release of "Fedora Core
Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: red hat 10 release date
And another one crawls out from under a rock.
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joe Szilagyi
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 5:19
And another one crawls out from under a rock.
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joe Szilagyi
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: red hat 10 release date
Does anyone happen to know what it is? Thanks. __
22 matches
Mail list logo
