On 6/23/05, Adrian Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From my POV:
> I've been using Reiser4 for almost everything (Rootfs / External
> Harddrives) for about ~8 Months without any data loss..
>
> Powerloss, unpluging the Disk while writing, full filesystem,
> heavy use : No problems with reis
When unmounting my reiser4 partition today on my 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 kernel
I got the following:
Any ideas? Any way I can help track down this issue? I'm fscking now,
I will report results if desired.
Badness in __writeback_single_inode at fs/fs-writeback.c:251
[] __writeback_single_inode+0xb3/0x1c0
Hello,
I'm moving to amd64 today/tomorrow and was wondering if there were any
sucess stories with reiser4. I used reiser4 on x86 and will be
starting from scratch with this one, was just wondering how much
sucess there was for such a thing.
Thanks,
avuton
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is
On 11/9/05, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dnia Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:56:56 +0100, Avuton Olrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> napisał:
> > sucess stories with reiser4. I used reiser4 on x86 and will be
> > starting from scratch with this one, was just wondering
On 11/15/05, Andreas Rosander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well i do recon that I to have slow downs with vim or rather gvim and
> I have noticed it when im use gedit too.
> will try to downgrade too 2.6.12 and see if my box will rid of the slowdowns
It's funny that you mention vim. vim seems to b
On 11/21/05, E.Gryaznova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you
> please provide more info?:
> Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh
> created reiser4 too?
> Are these values stable reproducible? If you run this
On 11/22/05, E.Gryaznova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sander wrote:
>
> >E.Gryaznova wrote (ao):
> Something like
> for i in cfq noop anticipatory deadline
> do
> echo $i > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler && cat
> /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler && echo "foo" >/root/test && time vim +"s/
> foo/bar/
On 11/23/05, Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
> > Craig Shelley wrote:
> > >With the noatime and nodiratime options, the problem of accessing files
> > >causing a massive sync time has gone. See the results below.
> Please don't forget that the behavior without 'noatime'
On 11/26/05, Gemtech Form Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me if the website how-to is incorrect and where the
> source is currently found?
The FTP site is where I usually get the sources from.
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is a
On 11/26/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> has improved a lot since the VFS changes moved all the furniture to the
> left side of the room, but there are currently problems with NFS support.
>
> Hans
>
I've had 0 issues (well, if the interactivity problem isn't counted)
with amd64 and m
Hello,
Just wanted to let ya'll know I have reported reiser4 crashing in the
2.6.16-rc1-mm4 thread on lkml; Unfortunately I have already replaced
the fs on this computer, so I won't be too much of a help on this bug
itself.
Thanks
--
avuton
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Ru
Hello,
I just saw a thread on the LKML a minute ago asking about the state of
getting the patch into vanilla linux. I read Andrew Morton's post
about a month ago stating that it could happen soon, but was unlikely
due to there not actually being a need for it to go into mainline (no
major distro d
On 3/15/06, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Avuton Olrich wrote:
> >I just saw a thread on the LKML a minute ago asking about the state of
> >getting the patch into vanilla linux. I read Andrew Morton's post
> >about a month ago stating that it could happ
This is tac'd output, I'm not sure it's a reiser4 bug, but it ecasound
was writing to my TB partition. If it's already been fixed, please
point me to the patch :) Thanks.
Mar 22 12:47:49 shapeshifter Code: Bad EIP value.
Mar 22 12:47:49 shapeshifter [] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
Mar 22 12:47:49
On 4/10/06, Alexander Zarochentsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 09:28, Matt Eaton wrote:
> > I was running OpenOffice and tried saving a file.
> >
> > I'm using 2.6.16.1 + reiser4-for-2.6.16-1.patch.gz
> >
> > (Please help! I'm having to run openoffice on a different filesy
Kernel: 2.6.16.3 with reiser4-for-2.6.16-2
Compiler: GCC-4.1.0
Notes: This caused the computer to not allow login, refuse to route
network stuff, though I could see kernel messages still coming through
(such as network traffic trying to get through).
Any questions please ask. Thanks
Apr 15 22:58
On 4/18/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 00:35 -0700, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> > Kernel: 2.6.16.3 with reiser4-for-2.6.16-2
> > Compiler: GCC-4.1.0
> >
> > Notes: This caused the computer to not allow l
On 7/20/06, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're not supposed to be doing it that way these days. RAID autodetect
is getting tossed out of the kernel in the future (probably still many
Bit OT, but is there something that is supposed to replace RAID
autodetect, or we're just suppos
18 matches
Mail list logo
