Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
**[Test build #67423 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67423/consoleFull)**
for PR 13891 at commit
[`294164d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67423/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
**[Test build #67423 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67423/consoleFull)**
for PR 13891 at commit
[`294164d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84615167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -76,8 +76,14 @@ abstract class Covaria
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67422/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
**[Test build #67422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67422/consoleFull)**
for PR 13891 at commit
[`d29fd67`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
**[Test build #67422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67422/consoleFull)**
for PR 13891 at commit
[`d29fd67`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
I have another question. I found this PR also use `expressions` in the
description when the function only accepts foldable expressions. This is also
unclear to the users.
---
If your project is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84613013
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CallMethodViaReflection.scala
---
@@ -43,11 +43,20 @@ import org.apache.s
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
To differentiate literals from expressions, the simplest way is to add
`expr` or `expression` into the function name. For the arguments whose names do
not contain `expr`, they are treated as lite
Github user sheepduke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15579
@srowen Hi, at first we wanted to add support for numactl only, but later
we thought that it is rather better to make it possible for adding the prefix
command. It is not only for NUMA, but also f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67421/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
**[Test build #67421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67421/consoleFull)**
for PR 13252 at commit
[`031c9da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67420/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
**[Test build #67420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67420/consoleFull)**
for PR 15603 at commit
[`6fcd247`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
IMHO, I would like to leave it and prefer to differentiate literal from
expression as it throws an exception, for example, when a column is given as an
argument for literal, the exception messag
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
cc @kayousterhout @markhamstra
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user erenavsarogullari opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
Add Pool usage policies test coverage for FIFO & FAIR Schedulers
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following FIFO & FAIR Schedulers Pool usage cases need to have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Thanks @gatorsmile. I will double-check if there is any instance more that
misses default value.
For the format, I asked @rxin initially to avoid change a lot repeatedly.
Could I please
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
@srowen Addressed the try-finally, this look good to go now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84604637
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/ApproximatePercentile.scala
---
@@ -49,21 +49,29 @@ import org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84604598
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/xpath.scala
---
@@ -150,8 +206,16 @@ case class XPathString(xml: Exp
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
@srowen This is explicitly supports maven.test.skip=true - the rationale
for using it can be project specific (generating clean builds for various
profile combinations, internal release builds from
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
**[Test build #67421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67421/consoleFull)**
for PR 13252 at commit
[`031c9da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user CodingCat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
Merging to branch-2.0. Thanks! Can you close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
[`6b29002`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
**[Test build #67417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/consoleFull)**
for PR 15441 at commit
[`0162c81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
**[Test build #67419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67419/consoleFull)**
for PR 15602 at commit
[`e0d806a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
**[Test build #67420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67420/consoleFull)**
for PR 15603 at commit
[`6fcd247`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
[WEBUI][MINOR] Return types in methods + cleanup
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The main purpose of the change is to discuss the purpose of `SparkUITab`
class a
Github user yinxusen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
How about the following:
1. Since the new generated model is derived from an estimator, the model
should have the same params as its parent estimator. That's why there is no
need to consid
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15596
@JoshRosen could you shed some light on why we are not using the regular
`EnsureRequirements` based code path for `CollectLimitExec`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595#discussion_r84600741
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -377,4 +377,23 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends Anal
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
**[Test build #67419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67419/consoleFull)**
for PR 15602 at commit
[`e0d806a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
GitHub user CodingCat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
[SPARK-18058][SQL] [BACKPORT-2.0]Comparing column types ignoring
Nullability in Union and SetOperation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR tries to fix
[SPARK-18
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
merged to branch-2.0 and then cherry-picked to master for the error message
fix not in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
[`6b29002`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Just saw that this got merged. I had a tiny nit but its ok without it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595#discussion_r84600424
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -377,4 +377,23 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends An
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
**[Test build #67417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/consoleFull)**
for PR 15441 at commit
[`0162c81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
sure, doing that now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
@CodingCat could you open a backport for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
It is relatively straight forward to test `ImperativeAggregate`s. See:
-
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.HyperLogLogPlusPlusSuite
-
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441#discussion_r84599733
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UISeleniumSuite.scala ---
@@ -651,6 +671,15 @@ class UISeleniumSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
WebBrowse
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67415/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67415/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`2656c62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
**[Test build #67416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67416/consoleFull)**
for PR 15595 at commit
[`e691714`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
Sorry, will review it soon. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
We should also add the default value in the argument description. Below is
an example.
```
Arguments:
col - a numeric expression.
percentage - a numeric literal or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Another example:
```
Arguments:
expr1 - a numeric expression.
expr2 - a numeric expression.
```
->
```
Arguments:
expr1 - Data type: numeric.
expr2 -
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
I prefer to minimizing the words without showing any information. Below is
an example.
```
Arguments:
class - a string literal that represents a fully-qualified class name.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597837
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/ApproximatePercentile.scala
---
@@ -49,21 +49,29 @@ import org.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597661
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -692,9 +722,11 @@ case class DenseRank(chi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597610
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/xpath.scala
---
@@ -150,8 +206,16 @@ case class XPathString(xml: Expr
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597530
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -970,9 +1270,19 @@ case class Round(child: E
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
**[Test build #67416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67416/consoleFull)**
for PR 15595 at commit
[`e691714`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67415/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`2656c62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user techaddict closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
closing this since, its maybe not the right way to do this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
[`9154463`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
LGTM. Merging to branch-2.0. Could you close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67412/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
[`b233d09`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #67414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/consoleFull)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`8b94909`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`feafdc2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
Merging to master. Thanks! Ping me for the follow-up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
**[Test build #67410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/consoleFull)**
for PR 14957 at commit
[`ab8f5ec`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
101 - 200 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
