Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85161/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
**[Test build #85164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85164/testReport)**
for PR 20021 at commit
[`3d44195`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85164/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
> I don't think they are independent as architecturally they make sense
together and represent a single concern: enabling use of remote dependencies
through init-containers. Missing any one of the th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85165/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
[`d92ae90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19991
@holdenk @sethah any other comments?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85181/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
[`3c16c47`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3c
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h..
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
[`fc14aeb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
**[Test build #85183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85183/testReport)**
for PR 19904 at commit
[`cad2104`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ca
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
For https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#issuecomment-352993779,
> I have seen few tests failed in Python 2 and PyPy with Pandas and PyArrow
in my local if i am not mistaken and if
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
> I checked some call sites. Here is one example that `extraArguments` has
`ev.value` instead of local variable.
Hey, `ev.value` is not from children, it's the output of the current
expre
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977#discussion_r158004864
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -566,6 +568,21 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977#discussion_r158005532
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -566,6 +568,21 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
Ideally we should not change behaviors as possible as we can, but since
this behavior is from Hive and Hive also changed it, might be OK to follow Hive
and also change it? cc @hvanhovell too
--
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: review
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
Hi @brkyvz, could you take a look please?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional c
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
@cloud-fan yes, Hive changed and most important at the moment we are not
compliant with SQL standard. So currently Spark is returning results which are
different from Hive and not compliant with SQ
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
**[Test build #85184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85184/testReport)**
for PR 19498 at commit
[`174ec21`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/17
Github user sujithjay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
@tgravescs , could you please take a look when you have some time ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apa
GitHub user foxish opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
[SPARK-22845] [Scheduler] Modify spark.kubernetes.allocation.batch.delay to
take time instead of int
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing configuration that was taking
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
**[Test build #85185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85185/testReport)**
for PR 20032 at commit
[`48a3326`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/48
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85181/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
[`3c16c47`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85181/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r158008588
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,498 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
+---
+* This will b
Github user yashs360 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Hi @brkyvz , I've added the new changes with the java classes. Had to make
the classes serializable for passing them to the KinesisReceiver. Please have a
look when you get time. Thanks.
---
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85167/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
[`74ac5c9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85167/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
**[Test build #85185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85185/testReport)**
for PR 20032 at commit
[`48a3326`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85185/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85184/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
**[Test build #85184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85184/testReport)**
for PR 19498 at commit
[`174ec21`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85172/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
[`4f1d5e2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85172/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
**[Test build #85183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85183/testReport)**
for PR 19904 at commit
[`cad2104`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85183/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Oh, you are right. I misunderstood. After our optimizations, output is also
a part of `arguments`. Let me check others again.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
[`19bcca1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/19
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008#discussion_r158016336
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ case class SpecifiedWindowF
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
**[Test build #85173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85173/testReport)**
for PR 19218 at commit
[`0cb7b7a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85173/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
[`3291339`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
GitHub user Ngone51 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
[SPARK-22847] [CORE] Remove duplicate code in AppStatusListener while
assigning schedulingPool for stage
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In AppStatusListener's onStage
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158018917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -57,4 +45,8 @@ trait DataWritingCommand extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158019546
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -87,6 +87,51 @@ case class ExecutedCommandExec(cmd: Runnab
GitHub user BruceXu1991 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20034
[SPARK-22846][SQL] Fix table owner is null when creating table through
spark sql or thriftserver
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix table owner is null when create new
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20034
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85188/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
[`a596e58`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85178/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
[`d235847`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85178/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158025766
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,18 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85179/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
[`702162b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85179/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
since now we let inserting commands have a child, it makes sense to wrap
the child with `AnalysisBarrier`, to avoid re-analyzing them. also cc @viirya
---
--
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
@HyukjinKwon @wesm @BryanCutler
alright. here's my plan for right now:
* python 3.4.5 -- upgrade pyarrow --> 0.8.0 (confirmed working on my
staging environment)
what i'm n
Github user superbobry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19992#discussion_r158028287
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -444,12 +444,15 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
("Disk Size
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Enable to execute generated code of function in Generator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables to execute generated code of `Explode`, PosExplode`,
`Inline`, a
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035#discussion_r158029035
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -214,11 +214,15 @@ case class Stack(children: Seq[Exp
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
we should be good to go:
```$ pssh -h jenkins_workers.txt -t 0 "export
PATH=/home/anaconda/envs/py3k/bin$PATH; pip install pyarrow==0.8.0"
[1] 05:55:00 [SUCCESS] amp-jenkins-worker-01
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
**[Test build #85190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85190/testReport)**
for PR 20019 at commit
[`a2fa042`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a2
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
@smurakozi nice catch, added them. Additionally found a nit.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85189/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
[`2b65856`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2b
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
alright https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18754 should now be unblocked.
let me know if there's anything else that needs to happen.
---
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85191/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
[`81306c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/81
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
[`fc14aeb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Jenkins, test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: r
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
[`4b2dcac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
[`4b2dcac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
[`19bcca1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85193/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
[`7ccfd90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
[`3291339`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17425
@gatorsmile I have the same question. Which operation in Generator is bad?
All of them, or only one?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035#discussion_r158050733
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -435,6 +435,18 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTab
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035#discussion_r158047414
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -435,6 +435,18 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTab
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
This PR comes from [this
discussion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r157408061).
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Thank you so much, @zsxwing and @brkyvz
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r158060614
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -112,15 +112,15 @@ case class Like(left: Expre
101 - 200 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
