om: Christopher J. Feahr, OD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 276 routing question, esp. interested in Clearinghouse
guru's opinion
Rachel,
If I'm understanding this correctly, the use-case for the
contains the complete picture of a given entity's capabilities.
>This is the starting point for two entities to then reach agreement (CPA) on
>how they will conduct business electronically. Trying to develop a CPP
>without first going through the use case analysis and rigorously documentin
ginal Message-
From: Dave Minch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; William J. Kammerer
Subject: RE: 276 routing question, esp. interested in Clearinghouse
guru's opinion
Kepa's response raises an interesting que
Kepa's response raises an interesting question, and one which I have been
contemplating for some time - would a Plan, Provider, or CH (or other third
party) want to post multiple CPPs based on the usage? In other words,
there's 3 collaboration agreements and potentially 6 CPPs implied in Kepa's
d
Mattias/Tal Systems" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, 06 August, 2002 08:27 PM
> Subject: Re: 276 routing question, esp. interested in Clearinghouse
> guru's opinion
>
>
>
> - Original Message
