On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 1:33:19 PM UTC-4, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package.
>
> (1)
>
> According to a recent post on the Jupyter blog [0],
>
> - JupyterLab is ready for daily use.
> - JupyterLab will eventually replace the
On 2018-03-13 23:26, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
My view is that since it's pip-installable, it's as though it were
already an optional package.
I have a very different view of that. "optional" implies a level of
official support in SageMath. In particular, it should actually build
and work
On 2018-03-14 02:08, John H Palmieri wrote:
I feel like we need another class of package: "pending" (or perhaps some
other name) = those which we propose to make standard soon.
I agree with Vincent: the build system doesn't need to know that.
--
You received this message because you are
On 2018-03-13 23:26, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
What would it mean to make it an optional package?
Exactly the same as making it a standard package, except that the type
is "optional" instead of "standard".
Once you do that, it will be trivial to make it a standard package by
just changing the
I am not sure there is a need for such distinction. As a user, you
mostly don't care. As a developer, you know the "real" status.
Vincent
On 14/03/2018 02:08, John H Palmieri wrote:
I feel like we need another class of package: "pending" (or perhaps some
other name) = those which we propose to
I feel like we need another class of package: "pending" (or perhaps some
other name) = those which we propose to make standard soon. Most optional
packages are not intended to be converted to standard, as far as I can
tell, so "optional" isn't the appropriate tag in this case.
John
On
On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 10:26:55 PM UTC, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> 2018-03-13 20:01 GMT+01:00 Jeroen Demeyer >:
> >
> > On 2018-03-13 18:33, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> >>
> >> Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package.
> >
> > What is your
2018-03-13 20:01 GMT+01:00 Jeroen Demeyer :
>
> On 2018-03-13 18:33, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package.
>
> What is your case for *NOT* making it an optional package first?
My view is that since it's
On 2018-03-13 18:33, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package.
What is your case for *NOT* making it an optional package first?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package.
(1)
According to a recent post on the Jupyter blog [0],
- JupyterLab is ready for daily use.
- JupyterLab will eventually replace the classic Jupyter Notebook.
- JupyterLab has been over three years in the making, with over
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 4:58:53 AM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-06 00:29, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
> > I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
> >
> > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
> >
> > Any opinions?
>
> Shouldn't it be an optional package
On 2018-03-06 00:29, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
Any opinions?
Shouldn't it be an optional package first?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel"
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 11:33:57 PM UTC, William wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Samuel Lelièvre
> wrote:
> > I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
> >
> > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
> >
> > Any opinions?
>
> There is a
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
> I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
>
> Any opinions?
There is a murky discussion about making JupyterLab Python3-only maybe
as part of the 1.0
I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
Any opinions?
Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
15 matches
Mail list logo