Re: [Samba] Re: Logon Hours problems (Slackware)

2005-02-08 Thread bgforum2002
My setup was also on Slackware 10, and the time zone was correct, but still the time was incorrect, and changing strangely on every reboot (it was a dual-boot machine). I suppose it is a bug in Slackware 10. Besides, even the time zone is the same as yours - GMT+2. /etc/localtome is a symlink t

Re: [Samba] Re: Logon Hours problems (really stuck)

2005-02-04 Thread bgforum2002
I had some similar time problems with some versions of glibc. The solution was to point the link /etc/localtime from Sofia to Athens (we are in the same time zone). May be you could point that to some other city in the same time zone? On Thursday 03 February 2005 10:23, David Wilson wrote: > Hi

[Samba] Problem with Redhat 8 and access control of files

2003-08-14 Thread bgforum2002
I have a RH8 and samba version 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix. The problem is I can't change the permissins of files from Windows clients (NT and 2000). If I am logged as some user, create a file on some share and then try to change its permissions (for example trying to add read access to Everyone)

[Samba] Re: samba Digest, Vol 2, Issue 79

2003-02-26 Thread bgforum2002
Once I have set up my Linux samba servers I would like to be able to get users to access our Novell 5 server via samba. It seems to suggest on the Samba site that Samba will run on a Novell server but does anybody know how to do this? May be it would be easier to mount Novell volumes on the samba

[Samba] Re: Groups with Samba domain controler or domain member

2003-02-20 Thread bgforum2002
Update again: glibc-2.3.1-46 _did_ break alot of things. I downgraded back to the one that came on the RedHat 8.0 CD. You could downgrade to RedHat 7.3 (run up2date!) to fix this problem, or work around it as I described. I hadn't tested that workaround, so your only option could be going back

[Samba] Re: Groups with Samba domain controler or domain member

2003-02-19 Thread bgforum2002
Are you using RedHat 8.0? It's also broken on my RedHat 8.0 workstation; I think it's because there are so many members of that group and some broken library in 8.0 can't handle long group memberships. It's working perfectly on all of my 7.3 servers. A _possible_ workaround is: getent group |

Re: [Samba] Re: Groups with Samba domain controler or domain member

2003-02-18 Thread bgforum2002
Besides how to overcome the issue with permissions using group names with spaces, what other kind of information do you need to know about groups? Well, is it possible to map some NT group to Unix (except Domain Admins and Guests)? I need at least the Domain Users group, since I had set up a

[Samba] Re: Groups with Samba domain controler or domain member

2003-02-18 Thread bgforum2002
chgrp 'Domain Admins' some_file.txt I tried that; it works with Domain Admins and every custom created group, but not with the built-in groups like Domain Users. What could be the reason? __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one w

[Samba] Groups with Samba domain controler or domain member

2003-02-17 Thread bgforum2002
Does anybody know more about groups? I am considering switching from NT to Samba domain and have made some test. Unfortunately I need to make two additional groups, except Domain Admin (one of them is Domain Users). Is it possible to make that with the stable version of Samba? And another, but

[Samba] winbind withoutt PAM

2003-01-22 Thread bgforum2002
As I understood from Samba documentation winbind can run without PAM installed; PAM is needed only if I need interactive login in the Unix box of NT domain users. Am I correct? __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News