- Original Message -
From: Marshall Dudley
Marshall
Thanks for the prompt reply and for clarifying a few points.
Plenty of investigation still to be done.
We can stumble along together :-)
Regards - Ivan.
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Dudley
>snip<
>
> The table shows that oxygen has an electronegative value of 3.5.
>
> I think the confusion may come from the fact that oxygen wants to
acquire 2
> electrons when it ionically binds to something (making it appear
that the atom is
> posi
Reid Smith wrote:
> Oxygen has a positive charge so it would be attracted to the enzyme or
organism.
Reference General Chemistry third Edition, by Whitten, Gailey and Davis, page
138
and 139:
"The electronegativity of an element is a measure of the relative tendency of an
atom to attract ele
>Sorry for the confusion. I see what the problem is with this. OK this is
>what I see happening. The organism has an enzyme that gives it a negative
>charge, so as to repel oxygen. Silver by having a positive charge attracts
>both oxygen and the organism to it's surface, bringing them together
Ivan Anderson wrote: .
> However it is misleading to say that aerobic = good bacteria.
> Most of the pathogens used (and disabled :-) ) in Andrew Sloops recent
> post are aerobes, both Gram negative (negatively charged) and Gram
> positive and are problem microbes in our society.
>
Yes you are
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Dudley
Thanks for this Marshall,
Its great to see a vendor interested in establishing and publishing
such research.
> Although the common wisdom is that CS only kills bad bacteria,
testing
> that we have had done at the University of Tennessee over th
GO BIG ORANGE!!! I was therein 66-67. Graduated ar ETSU. Both my kids have
Masters at UT. Very good paper. Kudos. Kevorkian For White House Physician.
Jolly
Although the common wisdom is that CS only kills bad bacteria, testing
that we have had done at the University of Tennessee over the last few
months indicates that this is incorrect. We found that CS kills both
aerobic (good) as well as bad (anaerobic) bacteria pretty well equally.
Since many bact
CS does not reach the lower intestinal track in full strength as the cs
has been absorbed into the blood stream already. Evidence of this is
found with the fact that if a person wants to combat candida in the
intestines, he must use some sort of carrier (roughage, psyllium husk,
bentonite clay, et
If CS kills both good and bad bacteria, if one uses CS routinely, will he have
to continue to supplement his body with good bacteria.
How many hours apart, should CS be taken before the good bacteria is then
introduced into the system for purpose of repopulating?
If the good bacteria is taken f
10 matches
Mail list logo