Re: Kessler data

2013-02-25 Thread Leonard Koch
I think I posted that information and I'm afraid it won't be very helpful. I can get in contact with Kessler's lead software engineer again and ask him for a spec sheet or something akin. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paul Griswold < pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com> wrote: > Someone p

Re: Kessler data

2013-02-25 Thread Paul Griswold
Found it - here's what Leonard posted a while back: Okay, it seems it is available as xml data. This should be really easy to parse and getting the bezier curves to be accurate won't be too difficult either. Here is the email from Kessler Crane's lead software engineer Bruce Werf: * Hi Leonard,

Re: Kessler data

2013-02-25 Thread Paul Griswold
Someone posted some info to the list a while back. Let me see if I can track it down and repost it. You'd think Kessler would ship this thing with the ability to output something useful - at least for things like Nuke & Fusion. -Paul On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Jens Lindgren wrote: > Lo

Re: Kessler data

2013-02-25 Thread Jens Lindgren
Looking at that XML I'm guessing it will be hard to reverse engineer without a real rig to verify against. But if there is specs on the format it should be relatively easy. /Jens On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Steven Caron wrote: > is there any documentation on the format? reverse engineerin

Re: Kessler data

2013-02-24 Thread Steven Caron
is there any documentation on the format? reverse engineering it is possible but never fun s On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Paul Griswold < pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com> wrote: > Hey guys - > > I mentioned this a while back & if this list allows attachments, I'll > attach a Kessler

Kessler data

2013-02-24 Thread Paul Griswold
Hey guys - I mentioned this a while back & if this list allows attachments, I'll attach a Kessler XML file. It looks like rather than baking out a keyframe for every frame, it's describing curves. In any event, it's beyond my abilities to pull anything useful to Softimage out of it. This is a f