Re: [Standards] Some questions on MUC / XEP-0045

2014-05-22 Thread Kevin Smith
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Christian Schudt wrote: >> 3. Can a client request multiple affiliations and get all affiliated users? >> Like: >> >> http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#admin";> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which would return all members. >> >> >> It's not against the schema, of course, but

Re: [Standards] Some questions on MUC / XEP-0045

2014-05-16 Thread Dave Cridland
On 16 May 2014 06:43, Christian Schudt wrote: > > > 2. Is the actually needed in the muc#admin namespace? There are > no examples, but it's in the XML schema. > > > > > > Yes, see http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#example-90 > > Example 90 is in the #user namespace. > > Ah, yes, you're qu

Re: [Standards] Some questions on MUC / XEP-0045

2014-05-15 Thread Christian Schudt
> 2. Is the actually needed in the muc#admin namespace? There are no > examples, but it's in the XML schema. > > > Yes, see http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#example-90 Example 90 is in the #user namespace. > > 3. Can a client request multiple affiliations and get all affiliated use

Re: [Standards] Some questions on MUC / XEP-0045

2014-05-15 Thread Dave Cridland
On 14 May 2014 21:53, Christian Schudt wrote: > Hi, > > I have some questions on MUC: > > 1. Shouldn't the (initial) room subject message have Delayed Delivery, > because the subject was set some time ago? It probably should, but the spec > doesn't mention anything about it (7.2.16 Room Subject).

[Standards] Some questions on MUC / XEP-0045

2014-05-14 Thread Christian Schudt
Hi, I have some questions on MUC: 1. Shouldn't the (initial) room subject message have Delayed Delivery, because the subject was set some time ago? It probably should, but the spec doesn't mention anything about it (7.2.16 Room Subject). 2. Is the actually needed in the muc#admin namespace? T