RE: the wait page primer

I'm interested, please send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Missine Alec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:08 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: the wait page primer Importance: Low For those of you folks who likes complete and

Re: nested : NestedPropertyHelper

The check for NestedSelectTag is no more (removed last night. It wasn't buggy, just not needed). The check is replaced by one on an interface which some 14 or so tags use now. Did you get around the spurious results of the two tags?... Arron. Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) wrote: > >>-Original M

the wait page primer

For those of you folks who likes complete and concise working examples (who doesn't?:)), I have a war file that contains a Struts-based application that prototypes the wait page support for a time-consuming request (TCR). When a TCR (e.g., a database search) starts, the appropriate wait page is be

test, please ignore

Sorry for the inconvenience. Alec -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

digester newbie

I have the following test to convert an xml doc to objects. If the xml is formatted one way I can parse it, I am trying to get the xml in another format. The last piece of xml is what I am trying to get to. Any suggestions? (Do I have to go with addCallMethod approach?) Thanks. -Rick //

Re: Checkbox's question.

Here is modified code for CheckBoxTag. Maybe it could be usefull to other developpers as it enables unchecking checkboxes without having to write some reset() method for ActionForms. I worked on Struts 1.0 version of CheckBoxTag, what i modified : - added indexed tags support - added generatio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5540] New: - Please add our URL to the Consultants list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: nested : NestedPropertyHelper

> -Original Message- > From: Arron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: donderdag 20 december 2001 15:25 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: nested : NestedPropertyHelper > [snip] > I also removed the check for the select tag. I had it there from when > there was no NestedParen

Re: nested : NestedPropertyHelper

Imbedded Context response... >Auch Arron, > >Are you sure all those "instanceof" checks are a good idea? Adding >another nested tag would require you to adapt the NestedPropertyHelper, >which isn't clean design IMHO. > Quite sure. The "instanceof"s look for standard nesting functionality which t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5534] New: - Request to be listed in Husted's Struts Consultants list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

nested : NestedPropertyHelper

Auch Arron, Are you sure all those "instanceof" checks are a good idea? Adding another nested tag would require you to adapt the NestedPropertyHelper, which isn't clean design IMHO. And I wouldn't have noticed this if I wasn't checking an NestedIterate bug. nested:iterate behaves differently tha

RE: Nested tags: radio problem

Oeps *blushes*. Was it there yesterday also? Probably skipped it, thinking "Hey, I already know that stuff!". thanks, tomK > -Original Message- > From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: woensdag 19 december 2001 23:44 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Nested tags