RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

> -Original Message- > > In the future, we should be able to write pure business Actions that > don't use http semantics, and only use the http version when we > absolutely need to. In practice, most of us rarely use the > http services > of the HttpRequest, and the same Actions could

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20760] - Extend DynaActionForms similar to Tiles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: UML Diagrams (o.a.s.actions)

Steve Raeburn wrote: Rob, You added the .gif UML diagrams for the actions package a couple of months ago. I'd like to add MappingDispatchAction. Is there a source image anywhere that I can edit or do I need to edit the .gif itself? I'll check that in. I used SilverRun-JDJ 1.1, it was free from

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions MappingDispatchAction.java

sraeburn2003/08/12 07:13:13 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions MappingDispatchAction.java Log: Changed log visibility to private Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -5 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/MappingDispatch

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Graham wrote: > > No, I was thinking Actions would be passed an ActionContext in their > > execute() method similar to how Servlets know about a ServletContext. > The > > ActionContext would contain the HttpServletRequest, form bean, etc. > and > >

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml

> "craigmcc" == craigmcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: craigmcc> craigmcc2003/08/09 12:29:30 craigmcc> Modified:.build.xml craigmcc> ELFormTag.java ELHtmlTag.java craigmcc> ELJavascriptValidatorTag.java craigm

Re: Wildcard-matched actions (again)

--- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to put the wildcard-matched action code from Bug #21813 > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21813) into > Struts. When I mentioned it last, the only concern I heard raised was > from Craig regarding performance penalties. As I n

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions MappingDispatchAction.java LocalStrings.properties

One problem we have with existing classes is the protected static log variables. If used by a subclass, you get a confusing log message that points to the parent class. Can you change this to private? David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > sraeburn2003/08/11 20:26:53 > > Modified:src/

Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)

ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message-

Re: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)

ÔÚ 2003-08-08 21:15:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >I've created some patches to try this out and attached them to Bugzilla.of you ? >Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 > >Sorry about the multiple patch files, but WS Studio wouldn't play ball. > >I haven't touched

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals release-plan_1_2_0.xml

husted 2003/08/11 06:25:56 Modified:doc/proposals release-plan_1_2_0.xml Log: Add draft of 1.2.0 release plan. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +3 -3 jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/release-plan_1_2_0.xml Index: release-plan_1_2_0.xml =

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

Hi Some time ago I submitted a couple of refactorings to the DispatchAction/LookupDispatchAction classes. Since there was a recent discussion on these actions, I was wondering if that patch was going to be submitted for 1.2. Is there anything else I need to do? the patch is here: http://issues

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22314] - Performance Enhancement

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu