Re: CHIP with subsurface

2016-05-30 Thread Robert Helling
Hi, > Am 30.05.2016 um 16:41 schrieb Miika Turkia : > > IIRC this should be very easy to do with dnsmasq. I just had a look at the docs and indeed this seems to be exactly what I am looking for. Thanks Robert signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __

Re: [PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

2016-05-30 Thread Pedro Neves
On 28-05-2016 22:37, Dirk Hohndel wrote: So what should we be working on...? Should we... (1) just shut this down and move on? (2) move things to maintenance mode, abandon Subsurface-mobile, fix bugs in Subsurface whenever we find time but otherwise declare victory? It won't be too painful to

[PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

2016-05-30 Thread Willem Ferguson
On 30/05/2016 17:07, Benjamin wrote: On 29 May 2016 at 00:37, Dirk Hohndel > wrote: I have been focused on other things for a while (and the why and the what will become public fairly soon) and decided to use that chance to figure out what would happen if

Re: [PATCH] WIP: use kirigami plugin instead of embedding in qrc

2016-05-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 30 May 2016, Martin Gysel wrote: > > I'm wondering if it would be possible to get Kirigami 'into' qpm [1]. > That way it would be much simpler to use it in any qmake base app. > > I once played around with it and tried to create a .pri file but for > some reasons I failed. so, now if k

Re: [PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

2016-05-30 Thread Benjamin
On 29 May 2016 at 00:37, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > I have been focused on other things for a while (and the why and the what > will become public fairly soon) and decided to use that chance to figure > out what would happen if I just stopped paying attention here for a while. > > So what should we be

Re: CHIP with subsurface

2016-05-30 Thread Miika Turkia
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Robert Helling wrote: > Hi, > > my progress on the CHIP has unfortunately been slower than I though > originally (mainly because there are a number of things do do and each takes > longer than expected). > > Some things work, others not yet, but I see no fundamenta

Re: [PATCH] WIP: use kirigami plugin instead of embedding in qrc

2016-05-30 Thread Martin Gysel
Am 30.05.2016 um 14:55 schrieb Marco Martin: > On Monday 30 May 2016, Martin Gysel wrote: >> Am 30.05.2016 um 13:59 schrieb Marco Martin: >>> On Sunday 29 May 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: To make matters worse, Tomaz no longer has access to a Mac so he can’t help, either. Which means that ri

Re: [PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

2016-05-30 Thread Robert Helling
Hi Dirk, hi others! > On 28.05.2016, at 23:37, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > I have been focused on other things for a while (and the why and the what > will become public fairly soon) and decided to use that chance to figure out > what would happen if I just stopped paying attention here for a whil

Re: [PATCH] WIP: use kirigami plugin instead of embedding in qrc

2016-05-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 30 May 2016, Martin Gysel wrote: > Am 30.05.2016 um 13:59 schrieb Marco Martin: > > On Sunday 29 May 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >> To make matters worse, Tomaz no longer has access to a Mac so he can’t > >> help, either. Which means that right now a Kirigami version that > >> requires th

Re: [PATCH] WIP: use kirigami plugin instead of embedding in qrc

2016-05-30 Thread Martin Gysel
Am 30.05.2016 um 13:59 schrieb Marco Martin: > On Sunday 29 May 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> To make matters worse, Tomaz no longer has access to a Mac so he can’t >> help, either. Which means that right now a Kirigami version that requires >> the plugin is a non-starter for Subsurface-mobile on iO

Re: [PATCH] WIP: use kirigami plugin instead of embedding in qrc

2016-05-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 29 May 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > To make matters worse, Tomaz no longer has access to a Mac so he can’t > help, either. Which means that right now a Kirigami version that requires > the plugin is a non-starter for Subsurface-mobile on iOS. I simply don’t > understand how this is suppose