I agree! That would be a great feature!
Jonathan Woodard wrote:
I don't exactly remember which version i started out with but many
burned .iso's later we arrive at 0.85 and finally pfsense installed the
first time without much of a problem. I wish to say congrats to the
development people and
I don't exactly remember which version i started out with but many
burned .iso's later we arrive at 0.85 and finally pfsense installed the
first time without much of a problem. I wish to say congrats to the
development people and the people in this mailing list as i have poured
over the lists t
On 9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Moacry, do you notice if it appropriately distributes the load?
>
> I just had a thoughti, if I set the bandwith on the interface to the actual
> broadband service rate as oppposed to NIC connection speed, would that affect
> the load b
Hello, I am going to try Pfsense next week, it sure will be a great product.
Very nice work! I have been looking for something like this for a LONG time!
You might see what Cyberoam is using, to get some ideas maybe.
www.cyberoam.com.
The software, not the CR series. It is based on Linux or a UN
Hey Moacry, do you notice if it appropriately distributes the load?
I just had a thoughti, if I set the bandwith on the interface to the actual
broadband service rate as oppposed to NIC connection speed, would that affect
the load balancing?
From: Moacyr Leite
Or another suggestion, something that I would do here if my second
connection wasn't 10x faster than the primary is to say send gaming
out one link and send browsing out the other. :)
--Bill
On 9/29/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not unique, we just don't have an easy way to impl
Not unique, we just don't have an easy way to implement ratio based
load balancing at this time. BTW, it'd be connection based anyway,
not true bandwidth balancing. I'd recommend putting some clients on
one connection, some on the other and manually balance the links using
rules.
--Bill
On 9/29
Wrong. A parent queue denotes a child queue. Create 4 queues and
assign your rules to the two child queues. Better yet, use the
ezshaper wizard, it's there so you don't have to try and figure out
how it all works.
--Bill
On 9/29/05, Audun Brekke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> There seems t
Title: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing
Hi Wesley,
I have one box with 3 WAN using load balancing.
WAN ADSL 2MB
WAN1 FR 1MB
WAN2 FR 512K
We even dont have this issue now. But we had hard time with
ftp-helper, I cant connect with any site.
I have issues with HTTPS and
OK, more info... Did a fresh install of 85.6 and I get the same DHCP error. Basically it barfs on a DHCP offer option 15:
Option 15: Domain Name = "domain_not_set.invalid" (from Ethereal sniff)
And in the pfsense system log:
dhclient[3538]: Bogus domain search list 15: domain_not_set.invalid (do
Hi Scott, is there a solution to this? Am I unique in that I have multiple WAN
connections of different capacities?
Anyone have another solution?
Thanks
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 7:20 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subjec
Load balancing uses round robin.
Scott
On 9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings, I have a Squid PROXY server that I want to use two DSL
> connections that I have with. However, one of them is a 1 megabit
> connection and the other is a 512kbps connections. Based on wh
Btw the microcode is loaded via the option link0 which is passed to
ifconfig. I'm not sure where that is set but a few grep for link0 in
/etc/ should show you.
-Original Message-
From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:22 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subje
A little more info please.
Version: ?
Did you set up defaults with the wizard ?
-lsf
From: Audun Brekke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29. september 2005 23:57
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Traffic
shaping. Parent Queue
There seems to be
There seems to be an error in the traffic shaping.
When I set the queues manually it is not possible to
set the parent queue.
I can set the queue to be parent in the webui, but
the queue don’t seem to be updated.
I get an error like:
php: : There were error(s) loading the rules:
/tm
Greetings, I have a Squid PROXY server that I want to use two DSL
connections that I have with. However, one of them is a 1 megabit
connection and the other is a 512kbps connections. Based on what I have
read on the list, I am concerned that the load balancing algorithm will
NOT distribute 2/3 an
So what irqs are the 3com and Intel on?
-Original Message-
From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:53 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until the
QFE card is
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until theQFE card is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fineJB
Which QFE card is not supported?
Dave-- -
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until the
QFE card is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4
interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fine
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 3:49 pm, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
3c509 or 3c905?
The 509 is an ISA card which means you need to run the 3com util
3c5x9cfg (I think that's what its called) to make sure you don't have
any irq/io conflicts.
might have jumpers on the card in lieu of that, a few of them did.
Might also ha
And there was a few minor rule settings that you could set on m0n0
that doesn't work on pfS but everything else should be ok.
So back to the convo before the reported broken-ness...
I'd say we simply unset the traffic shaper configuration on import and
convert proxy arp -> virtual ip's?
Scott
OK, I'm wrong, this works as advertised.
--Bill
On 9/29/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This used to work, but our config has significantly diverged from
> m0n0. I suspect if you used a config from where we forked it'd
> probably work, but assuming m0n0 changed _anything_ in thei
3c509 or 3c905?
The 509 is an ISA card which means you need to run the 3com util
3c5x9cfg (I think that's what its called) to make sure you don't have
any irq/io conflicts.
3c905 being PCI wouldn't have that issue.
-Original Message-
From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
No, it was missing a ]
Thanks for the heads up!
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:31 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
> >Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to
> >
>
> syntax error in your change. the ')' should be a ']' ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
At 01:31 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to
syntax error in your change. the ')' should be a ']' ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to
Scott
On 9/29/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not easily. The code detects that you have a fxp driver and then
> tries to init the code. I suppose we could add a tag to
> or something...
>
> On 9/29/05, J B
Not easily. The code detects that you have a fxp driver and then
tries to init the code. I suppose we could add a tag to
or something...
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have
> older Pro100 cards - (trying to recy
Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have
older Pro100 cards - (trying to recycle some old equipment and make it
usefull again)
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:14 pm, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> I suspect the microcode is borking the NIC.Do you have a newer
> NIC th
I suspect the microcode is borking the NIC.Do you have a newer
NIC that you could try? I would rather not remove the microcode
support as it works wonders for newer cards.
Scott
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of m
At 01:12 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me so I
could send the actual error - but it keeps saying that the microcoad load
is timing out
sounds like the nic is flaky. i'm running the same NIC on my pfsense
(as the LAN) and it works fin
Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me so I
could send the actual error - but it keeps saying that the microcoad load
is timing out
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:08 pm, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
>
>> yes - it shows up as fxp0 - bu
At 12:48 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
yes - it shows up as fxp0 - but then I get errors loading microcode - and
it just don't work on the network
"gets errors". can you be more specific?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
yes - it shows up as fxp0 - but then I get errors loading microcode - and
it just don't work on the network
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 12:38 pm, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
> Quoth J B:
>
>
>> As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1
>> Intel
>> Pro 100 (stand alone), 1
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the freebsd device name is hme:
I have added device hme and the kernel is currently compiling. Unless
it errors out expect to see this in the next version.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Quoth J B:
> As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1 Intel
> Pro 100 (stand alone), 1 Linksys Fast eth (shows up as dc0) and a 3com 3c509
In my case, the device name is fxp
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch,
the freebsd device name is hme:
The hme(4) driver supports the on-board Ethernet interfaces of many Sun
UltraSPARC workstation and server models. Cards supported by the
hme(4) driver include:
* Sun PCI SunSwift Adapter
* Sun SBus SunSwift Adapter .( hme. and .SUNW,hme.)
*
Quoth J B:
> I'm having issues with the following NIC cards:
>
> Intel Pro 100 - recognized, but doesn't seem to work - used it as my LAN
Am currently using a PRO 100 on a Routerboard 230.
pfSense 81.4, currently.
> interface - connected it back to back with another maching using a X-over
> c
On 9/29/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> 1) What does the load balancing option in CARP page do?
It's a poor way of load balancing based on the HASH AFAIK.
>From the manpage:
net.inet.carp.arpbalance Balance local traffic using ARP.
> 2) If load balancing
That NIC is not supported as far as I can tell. If you know the
device name in freebsd please let me know.Try removing the quad
port nic and I bet the single nic will work.
Scott
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having issues with the following NIC cards:
>
> Sun Quad Fast E
I'm having issues with the following NIC cards:
Sun Quad Fast Ethernet - not recognized
Intel Pro 100 - recognized, but doesn't seem to work - used it as my LAN
interface - connected it back to back with another maching using a X-over
cable and configured both on the same net - couldn't access the
Yeah, I've been thinking about this for a bit and I'm starting to
think we should just reject m0n0wall files. We've divulged from
their codebase enough to warrant it, I think.
Scott
On 9/29/05, Jonathan Woodard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> >We convert m0n0wall configur
Scott Ullrich wrote:
We convert m0n0wall configurations on import. We convert the tag
names and remove the traffic shaper.But don't expect proxyarp and
things of this nature to work.
Scott
On 9/29/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This used to work, but our config has si
Ahh yes. The DISABLE/ENABLE button needs to be updated. Good catch.
I'll fix in a bit.
Scott
On 9/29/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> HI
>
>
>
> I just did another update_file.sh .. and re-setup CARP. Doing a Reboot
> brings CARP up into Master as expec
We convert m0n0wall configurations on import. We convert the tag
names and remove the traffic shaper.But don't expect proxyarp and
things of this nature to work.
Scott
On 9/29/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This used to work, but our config has significantly diverged from
At 10:48 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i assumed he had all that correct, since he said
> he could see the traffic going into the pfsense
> port. i was going to ask the same question,
> myself. this has to be a config problem, as i'm using
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i assumed he had all that correct, since he said
> he could see the traffic going into the pfsense
> port. i was going to ask the same question,
> myself. this has to be a config problem, as i'm using this exact same setup.
I agree, whi
No, CARP is on LAN.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:22 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 050.2 CARP won't go Master or Backup
On 9/29/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wr
HI
I just did another update_file.sh .. and re-setup CARP. Doing
a Reboot brings CARP up into Master as expected ;) ( I can’t turn
on the slave to test if it is 100%.. but the behavior seems better) So this
part seems fixed.
HOWEVER - It still insists on going back to INIT .. whe
At 10:27 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Is the switch port configured for tagging, or
did you configure it to allow vlans 1-4 to talk
to port 2? The VLAN setup in pfSense utilises
802.1q tagging, enabling vlans on a port doesn't
necessarily configure that port for tagged
frames. --Bill On 9/29/05,
This used to work, but our config has significantly diverged from
m0n0. I suspect if you used a config from where we forked it'd
probably work, but assuming m0n0 changed _anything_ in their config
file since then, it's unlikely to convert over. I think we're at the
point where either someone need
Is the switch port configured for tagging, or did you configure it to
allow vlans 1-4 to talk to port 2? The VLAN setup in pfSense utilises
802.1q tagging, enabling vlans on a port doesn't necessarily configure
that port for tagged frames.
--Bill
On 9/29/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On 9/29/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI
>
> Firstly I didn't have time yet to do another update_file.sh so the problem
> may already be fixed.. but in the interim:
>
> After the update_file.sh I did yesterday morning .. I have an intermittent
> issue which I t
Well, it's not "supposed" to work. I'm still not sure how it was made
to work in this fashion. But, I can offer one suggestion on a way
that it might work. On the outbound NAT screen, you'll need to create
a NAT bound to the LAN interface NATing everything from LAN destined
for LAN to the LAN IP
At 09:24 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
>
> Lan
> |
> |
> Port2 on
switch-
> port 4 on switch vlan 3--
>
> Lan
> |
> |
> Port2 on
switch-
> port 4 on switch vlan 3--win XP
>
No, m0n0wall config files are not compatible with pfSense anymore.
Fortunately, unless you have a massively complex configuration, it should be
reasonably straightforward to set up your pfSense box to work as your
m0n0wall did without too much drama.
-Gary
-Original Message-
From: Jonatha
At 05:28 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
This might be off
topic but I am flummoxed by the problem so I thought I would ask.
Configuration
Pfsense
Lan with 3 vlans and lan as parent.
Switch with vlan 1 through to 4 enabled
Port 2 is setup on switch with all vlans and is plugged into lan on
This might be off topic but I am flummoxed by the problem so
I thought I would ask.
Configuration
Pfsense
Lan –with 3 vlans and lan as parent.
Switch with vlan 1 through to 4 enabled
Port 2 is setup on switch with all vlans and is plugged into
lan on pfsense.
Then
HI
The setup:
Router2 – Secondary
PPPoe WAN - 172.16.24.125 -
|
| -
Virtual 172.16.24.124
Router1 – Primary |
PPPoe WAN - 17
HI
Firstly I didn't have time yet to do another update_file.sh so the problem may
already be fixed.. but in the interim:
After the update_file.sh I did yesterday morning .. I have an intermittent
issue which I think is also related.. ng0 goes down, AND stays down, even after
reboots. Doing an
60 matches
Mail list logo
