Yes, I've been running this for a long time now. My pfsense box has one NIC
and 6 VLANs, no issues at all.
-Original Message-
From: Raja Subramanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 19:32
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] pfsense on router with single
Should work just fine. Answer 'y' to the first prompt (asks if you
want to setup vlans!) after installing :)
--Bill
On 5/14/06, Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to setup a firewall + NAT box which contains a single physical
NIC and the WAN and LAN interfaces config
Hi,
I would like to setup a firewall + NAT box which contains a single physical
NIC and the WAN and LAN interfaces configured as vlan devices.
Some ascii art:
LAN -- vlan0 \
+ fxp0 == pfSense
WAN -- vlan1 /
Is pfSense capable of running in this config?
Note that, my hardware i
On 5/14/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The CPU of the wrap has a thermal sensor integrated that can shut it down. I
guess that this triggered the reboot. Maybe it needs an active cooling or at
least a passive cooler to get rid of the heat. Try to measure the temperature
when doing
There is something else to think about:
In case you are missing a feature you can offer a donation to get it in where
vendors just laugh at you or ignore your request or even do it yourself as the
source is all at your fingertips.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail
Not to seem repetitive, but if you are making a real business case to your management (which I have been called upon to do several times as a network security consultant):1. The initial capital cost of pfSense of off-the-shelf hardware is far lower for pfSense than commercial products.2. Operationa
Well for me...I have commit access to pfSense, I don't for Sonic or Cisco ;-P
For everyone else...
1. Good luck getting a quick patch for a small bug from Cisco -
personal experience tells me that unless it's a sev 1 (network down)
AND you have a good support contract with them, you won't get an
I have a theory. I was able to install this card on a different
system and it worked. It could be related to BIOS settings.
Unfortunately, I have to install a video card to check the bios.
Park
On May 13, 2006, at 12:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed Beta4 - Embedded and boote
What are the general business and technical cases to go
with pfsense over turn key appliances like Cisco or Sonicwall etc?
Thanks
I personally never had issues with a wrap and heat btw using the original cases
they offer without modifications but there have been discussions about heat
problems from time to time on the m0n0 list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Holger Bauer
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 9:20 PM
> To: s
The CPU of the wrap has a thermal sensor integrated that can shut it down. I
guess that this triggered the reboot. Maybe it needs an active cooling or at
least a passive cooler to get rid of the heat. Try to measure the temperature
when doing the test again.
> -Original Message-
> From:
On 5/14/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a heat issue to me. What happens if you remove the topcase so the
heat can go away?
I didn't have the top case on at all. Is there some way to tell
exactly why it crashed?
--
Paul Haddad ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Sounds like a heat issue to me. What happens if you remove the topcase so the
heat can go away?
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Haddad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 6:57 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Suggested mini-itx sol
Hi All,
On 5/10/06, I wrote:
Again my assumption is that increasing the number of connections is
going to increase the CPU usage which will in turn decrease the max
throughput. Is this incorrect?
Just as an update. I tried out a WRAP box (1C-2) with my connection
(15/2 PPPoE). Running 2 fast
14 matches
Mail list logo
