On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> *I looked carefully at the situation of that road bridge in Bremen, and to
> me it looks clear that the stretch on the bridge cannot legally be a
> motorroad. When you enter from the west on the on-ramp I bet you do not
> find any sign tell
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:36 PM, 715371 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a very, very special case here:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318383959
>
> There is a road with four lanes, but not all of them seem to be
> motorroad. There is a sign which suggests that. I do not like to have a
> separate
Am 21.01.2015 um 00:03 schrieb Mariusz:
> Judging from Google Street photos (from 2008) all four lanes are motorrad.
> The sign 331.2 - end of motorrad - can be seen at about this location:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1968608980
> This would imply the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31
Am 21.01.2015 um 19:41 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> Is there any motorroad signpost before that part of the road?
No. The only existing sign on that link is that one on the picture.
There is no second on the right hand side, too.
If you mean the other direction: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20
2015-01-21 18:08 GMT+01:00 715371 :
> Here is a picture of the situation.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Special_motorroad_situation.jpg
>
Interesting... and confusing ;-)
Is there any motorroad signpost before that part of the road? When looking
at the photo I'm tempted to say tha
Hi,
Here is a picture of the situation.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Special_motorroad_situation.jpg
Cheers
Tobias
Am 20.01.2015 um 15:05 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> 2015-01-20 14:56 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
>>
>> Am 20.01.2015 um 08:44 schrieb Martin Vonwald :
>>
>> 2015-01
Hi
Judging from Google Street photos (from 2008) all four lanes are motorrad.
The sign 331.2 - end of motorrad - can be seen at about this location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1968608980
This would imply the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318383860 is
motorrad, and hence the bridg
2015-01-20 14:56 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> Am 20.01.2015 um 08:44 schrieb Martin Vonwald :
>
> 2015-01-20 3:36 GMT+01:00 715371 :
>
>> motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no
>>
>>
> Seems absolutely fine to me. One alternative (for better compatibility)
> would be motorroad=yes + motorroad:lanes
> Am 20.01.2015 um 08:44 schrieb Martin Vonwald :
>
> 2015-01-20 3:36 GMT+01:00 715371 :
>> motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no
>
> Seems absolutely fine to me. One alternative (for better compatibility) would
> be motorroad=yes + motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no .
this sounds strange to me, a m
2015-01-20 9:06 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt :
> So the correct mapping is that yo remove put motorroad=no on the short
> stretch on the bridge.
>
"yo remove put" -> "you put" ;-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetma
*I looked carefully at the situation of that road bridge in Bremen, and to
me it looks clear that the stretch on the bridge cannot legally be a
motorroad. When you enter from the west on the on-ramp I bet you do not
find any sign telling you that you are entering a motorraod. The motorroad
starts a
Hi!
2015-01-20 3:36 GMT+01:00 715371 :
> motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no
>
Seems absolutely fine to me. One alternative (for better compatibility)
would be motorroad=yes + motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no .
Best regards,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
T
Hi,
I have a very, very special case here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318383959
There is a road with four lanes, but not all of them seem to be
motorroad. There is a sign which suggests that. I do not like to have a
separate way there, so I used the following tagging.
motorroad:lanes=yes
13 matches
Mail list logo
