On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 07:07:19AM +1000, Liz wrote:
- There is no tool yet to see the impact of the relicensing to the data. But
this is the key need for those who are rather interested in the data than the
legalese. Please develop the tool first or leave sufficient time to let
develop
I've split this from the original thread before it derails the one it
was in any further, and cc'd legal-talk.
[...]
What could we (you/me/LWG) do to make this more inclusive?
Just some bullet points at first, explanation follows:
- There is no tool yet to see the impact of the relicensing to
Roland Olbricht schrieb:
- There is no tool yet to see the impact of the relicensing to the data. But
this is the key need for those who are rather interested in the data than the
legalese.
I would say that the new licence might be good, beter than the old one
BUT:
I also interested MUCH MORE
Heiko Jacobs-2 wrote:
But I don't will accept any data loss because only of legal reasons.
Wikipedia and other projects changed licence without any loss of data.
Unfortunately Wikipedia took advantage of a loophole: contributors agreed to
the current GFDL or any later version, and they
Consider two cases:
1. Current license does not cover the OSM data (I think that's the OSMF
view). In this case, OSMF can just change to ODBL without asking anyone.
2. Current license does cover the OSM data. Then there's no need to change.
Where's the issue?
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:55 PM,
On 14 July 2010 14:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
I.e. can the legal advice only be shared among people actually on the
LWG conference call, and not all OSMF members?
Who can be on the call - LWG members, any OSMF member, or anyone involved
in the project? Actually, I
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 13:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in
I've split this from the original thread before it derails the one it
was in any further, and cc'd legal-talk.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:57, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in many languages. I'd think having English-only
discussion at a set time
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 13:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
