On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 7:38 AM, bvh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:03:16AM -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > > I am not local, but the openstreetmap.org data at the north side of
> the
> > > canal does not seem to match what is on the imagery? More specifically
> > > t
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:03:16AM -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > I am not local, but the openstreetmap.org data at the north side of the
> > canal does not seem to match what is on the imagery? More specifically
> > the raster of streets seems out of place.
> The OSM data in OAM is 6 months
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:30:39AM +0200, bvh wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:40:42PM -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > > > in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be
> > > > fine
> > >
> > > hmm, i'm slightly baffled by that. the oam coverage for nz is
> > >
On 3 May 2008, at 03:40, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:51:43PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
>>
> In the majority of the world, OAM and Yahoo! imagery are the same --
> both based on Landsat. The difference, in those areas, is that OAM
> will
> display tiles far above "1
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> Richard is likely limited by the Yahoo! Flash API: I expect that
> there's
> a fair chance that Yahoo! hasn't updated their Flash API to provide
> the
> new zoom levels that the main API added 2-3 weeks ago (Yahoo added
> more
> zoom levels worldwide at that time
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:40:42PM -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > > in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be
> > > fine
> >
> > hmm, i'm slightly baffled by that. the oam coverage for nz is
> > appalling at best and as an aside, i'd be very surprised if it wa
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:19:52PM -0700, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
> You're right: that OAM imagery is very detailed. Unfortunately, it's
> not that good where I'm mapping.
Sorry, my comments were tongue in cheek. I don't expect there to be many
cases where OAM is the best choice for mapping
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:19 PM, David Muir Sharnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You're right: that OAM imagery is very detailed. Unfortunately, it's not
> that
> good where I'm mapping. In Oakland, California, Yahoo! has two zoom
> levels beyond what Potlatch will display. It would be very
You're right: that OAM imagery is very detailed. Unfortunately, it's not that
good where I'm mapping. In Oakland, California, Yahoo! has two zoom
levels beyond what Potlatch will display. It would be very helpful to me if
Potlatch would display those zoom levels. Google has one (or two) mor
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:51:43PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
> 2008/5/3 micha ruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be fine
>
> hmm, i'm slightly baffled by that. the oam coverage for nz is
> appalling at best and as an aside, i'd be ve
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/3 micha ruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be fine
>
> hmm, i'm slightly baffled by that. the oam coverage for nz is
> appalling at best and as an aside, i
2008/5/3 micha ruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be fine
hmm, i'm slightly baffled by that. the oam coverage for nz is
appalling at best and as an aside, i'd be very surprised if it was
better resolution than the yahoo imagery anywhere
in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be fine
regards
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
i'm doing some work in potlatch (tracing buildings) that needs high zoom
to be able to trace the building edges.
so, to richard: is there anyway to zoom the yahoo data, rather than it
disappearing at high zooms? i realise it'll be somewhat pixellated, but
it's still better than nothing
___
14 matches
Mail list logo