On 2022-08-14 3:23 a.m., Bob Cameron wrote:
I likely have this wrong, but worth a question.
Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the
sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the
changes/updates I did 10 months ago, right down to the service road
On 2022-07-28 4:22 p.m., Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I saw something similar a little while back when clearing Notes.
Same physical premises had 2 businesses operating out of it, one as
general scrap metal & the other a car wrecker, but two different
names, phone numbers & websites.
OK or
On 2022-07-28 12:29 a.m., nwastra wrote:
This mapper has added about a dozen similar businesses to the same car
wrecker yard.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/freecarpickup/history#map=19/-33.93048/150.99878
I assume this is ok as they are linked to the same physical location.
It's not okay
On 2021-10-28 8:05 p.m., osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote:
If it exists on the ground, it gets mapped. If there is no legal
access, that's access=no or access=private. If it's a path that has
been created by traffic where it's not officially meant to go, it's
informal=yes.
Yep, this
On 2019-06-16 10:26 p.m., Ben Kelley wrote:
Hi.
A project I have been thinking about for a while is creating a map of
Anglican (church) parish boundaries in Australia.
In some sense these are like admin boundaries, but the source of the
boundary is not easily verifiable. While the resulting
On 7/12/2016 1:50 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
- the additional requirement to adhere to the AUS privacy regulations
was not addressed in the response, which in itself would be a killer.
It depends if it's part of the license or a reminder that in Australia
there are other laws that may effect what
On 7/15/2016 7:15 PM, cleary wrote:
In regard to the Australian Privacy Principles, I think they have
responded to our concern. On this issue, the earlier response stated
very clearly that "We can also confirm that OpenStreetMap is not
responsible for the actions of your downstream users."
On 11/11/2015 9:04 PM, Leith Bade wrote:
We hope in the future to also make use of route relations, however the
key piece of software (osm2pgsql) we use to work with OSM does not
support them.
osm2pgsql does support route relations, and will in fact import them
with the default style.
On 7/29/2015 6:52 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Possibly tag it access=no and rename it to Track closed depending on
how widely the name Ant Track is known. It may be known as Ant Track
by a very small group of riders.
The name might not be Ant Track, but it's almost certainly not Track
On 4/15/2015 6:01 AM, Ross wrote:
Hi Simon,
The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and conditions
require permission to add data not owned by the contributor.
This is incorrect. An appropriate license is sufficient. Some obviously
appropriate licenses are CC0, PDDL, ODC-BY and
On 2/10/2015 4:32 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've completed their survey from a individual level, however will OSMF
be submitting an OSMF response? I'm not 100% across what exact
licensing conditions the data would need to be released under to leave
open the possibility of incorporating it
On 8/19/2014 3:42 PM, Daniel Sobey wrote:
Hi Steve,
There is a lot of open data that could potentially be used from
data.gov http://data.gov and state portals.
http://www.data.gov.au/
https://www.data.vic.gov.au/
http://data.sa.gov.au/
Much of this was released for the govhack competition
On 2014-07-05 5:03 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
As the title says agri.openstreetmap.org does not appear to be working.
Cheers
Ross
A number of servers are being moved to a new data center at UCL. See
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/ for more info. I believe the move is
complete, and everything
From: Will Rouesnel [mailto:w.roues...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:34 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Adding residential properties?
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is
From: Andrew Harvey [mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Geoscience NATMAP 250K Topo Maps
We'd have to get confirmation that data source was happy with
attribution in accordance with ODbL sections 4.2 and 4.3 which are
keep intact any copyright or Database Right
From: David Bannon [mailto:dban...@internode.on.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Geoscience NATMAP 250K Topo Maps
Then the license holder withdrew the ecw plugin for GDAL...
There's still an ECW plugin for GDAL. It requires the third-party
SDK and
He had imported some grid squares into OSM, as well as some earlier stuff
that I reverted. That particular changeset and the revert aren't related to
the missing stuff.
I'm inviting him to come to the lists to discuss their edits.
From: Leon Kernan [mailto:lker...@gmail.com]
Sent:
: Leon Kernan [mailto:lker...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 4:04 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Vandalism in Sydney OSM data ?
And it looks like you beat me to it :-)
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Leon Kernan lker...@gmail.com wrote
Source tags don't provide any kind of attribution because they can be (and
are) removed at any time by any user of the database. Attribution is
provided by listing on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors
From: Li Xia [mailto:lisxia1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 5:50
From: Nyall Dawson [mailto:nyall.daw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 4:27 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Vicmap data released on data.gov.au
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this has been raised yet, but in the last week the
entire VicMap dataset was released on
From: Andrew Elwell [mailto:andrew.elw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:43 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] park vs nature reserve
Can someone point me to guidelines for where the .au distinction between
the two lies?
I'm trying to map piney lakes (see
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 1:47 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] park vs nature reserve
Paul Norman wrote:
It's important to remember that leisure=park doesn't apply to all
parks.
I'm guessing
The only issue with CC BY is that some data owners believe that attribution
reasonable to the medium is more than the ODbL guarantees which allows
notices in a location . where users would be likely to look for it such as
a wiki page linked from /copyright or in the case of produced works, a
From: David [mailto:dban...@internode.on.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] OpenStreetMap in Government
Further, so much OSM data ends up in a psql database, one
column per tag. Believe it or not, psql does not like having column
names start with numerals. It
Actually, the slope is slippery. People have made it about old roads. There
are people who have mapped old roads where they have been completely
developed over and no trace remains.
Mapping the traces of an old rail line isn't historical mapping. If there
are currently traces there then it's
From: Alex Sims [mailto:a...@softgrow.com]
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Historical rail lines
On 26/11/2012 10:38 AM, mick wrote:
I'm in two minds about removing 'historical' data.
Yes, objects no longer visible on the ground shouldn't be rendered on
the map.
I've been following this
Hello,
If you're considering importing you need to read
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and make sure that
you've followed all of the steps before uploading anything else.
One of these is talking with the local community, which is why I've cc'ed
talk-au@ on this
27 matches
Mail list logo
