Peter Miller wrote:
>
> On 7 Aug 2009, at 08:02, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7 Aug 2009, at 00:06, Mark Williams wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Miller wrote:
This is the A13 and it in the ncn13 relation which I think is wrong
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23406798
Any tho
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
> Maybe we want different policies for different areas and different kinds of
> data.
>
> For example once all the roads are mapped we freeze the roads, but we allow
> free changing of street names until they reach a freeze point.
>
> Here in Ko
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Russ wrote:
> 80n wrote:
>
>> Try [amenity=pharmacy] instead of [*=pharmacy]
>>
>> The index for the second form is no longer being maintained. There were
>> relatively few queries of this form and the overhead was substantial.
>>
>> The software shouldn't give yo
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:55:30PM +0100, OJ W wrote:
> > Instead, I’d like to see a way of saying someone has verified the data
> > without changing it.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Checked_by
I’ve seen that proposal before, and it feels a little “icky”. The
comment
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Simon Ward wrote:
> It has already been said, but I think raising the barrier to
> contribution is the wrong way to go.
>
> Instead, I’d like to see a way of saying someone has verified the data
> without changing it.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 01:11:02PM +0100, Nick Barnes wrote:
> To my mind, nobody ought to be able to edit live map data unless:
>
> 1 - They have uploaded n tracks,
> 2 - They have had m edits approved by a moderator
> 3 - They are vouched for by somebody who has made many many edits
>
> (insert
6 matches
Mail list logo
