On 12/4/20 3:43 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04.12.20 12:33, Mikel Maron wrote:
I'm not sure what the "name" tag should be, but I am wondering what the point of the
translations are which simply duplicate the default name. Is it like a marker to say "don't
try calling this place anything
It seems that OSM has a an architectural problem with over-large relations?
Is modifying the relations in potentially arbitrary ways a good solution?
Seeking something that may work now, can any "size-based" relation
splits be done in a way that they can be automatically removed at some
futute
nto
California.
cheers - ray
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:03 PM Ray Kiddy <mailto:r...@ganymede.org>> wrote:
Hello -
I am seeing an interesting editing task at the eastern edge of
Riverside
County in California. As of now, I am not expert enough in JOSM to do
it, but
Hello -
I am seeing an interesting editing task at the eastern edge of Riverside
County in California. As of now, I am not expert enough in JOSM to do
it, but I will, at some point, be able to do it and I will do it then.
Unless someone else wants it.
I am starting to add lines to define the
Hello -
I have an early version of an application that I wanted to share. Please
be kind with it. There is documentation on the app.
The idea here is that people may want to keep track of the health of a
set of relations. Governmental entities, if they find a way to use OSM,
will want to "wa
://www.georeference.org/doc/zip_codes_are_not_areas.htm
Specifically for Zip codes, the best you could do is query for addr:postcode.
On Jun 24, 2020, at 2:33 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
Hello -
I am interested in where people in the US lack internet connectivity and I keep
thinking that I should be able to use OSM for
Hello -
I am interested in where people in the US lack internet connectivity and
I keep thinking that I should be able to use OSM for some part of this.
I am recalling (perhaps not accurately) that connectivity information is
published by the FCC and I think that at least some of the informat
Is there a way that the alt_name vs name situation can be sorted for a
key like "operator"?
For example, the "San Jose Unified School District" in California gives
too few results in overpass. Add queries for "San José Unified School
District" and you are good.
If I was looking at the distri
On 1/12/16 5:23 AM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Dale & list,
TeachOSM has initiated a project with the US Census Bureau we've been
calling 'Missing America', dedicated to mapping those marginal areas
and vulnerable populations. We're just getting organized, but
anticipate local communities playing
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:19:20 +0200
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/21/2015 04:46 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> > To me, OSM is a tool which is ideal for relating various information
> > layers across a multi-dimensional substrate. This substrate is a
> > two-dime
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:10:00 -0500
Toby Murray wrote:
> OSM is not the ideal tool to be a dumping ground for all GIS data. It
> excels at holding information that users can see, verify and update.
> Boundaries like this cannot be seen or verified by anyone except the
> government agency that orig
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:28:18 -0400
Bryan Housel wrote:
> Agree with everything you said about *why* groups are important,
> except that: now that it's 2015, Facebook groups is really a better
> place for this.
Well, isn't Facebook so two years ago? :-)
As for state mailing lists, that seems a l
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:12:52 + (UTC)
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Jack Burke writes:
>
> >
> > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I
> > can find
> the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary.
> AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it shou
I have been fixing up boundaries of cities in California and I have
found something odd.
Where is the city of Sacramento?
There is a city there. There is a county. The county boundaries are at
http://openstreetmap.org/relation/396460 and that all looks good. And
it is not a county/city hybrid th
I just wanted to check with the list on this. I think it makes sense to
do this, but I would like to know if I am wrong or if there are
concerns.
I am looking at 2 ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33075997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107712882
Together they seem to delineate the c
Good to know about the opengeofiction site. I have wondered what to do,
for example, with a school in Sunnyvale CA that closed 20+ years ago. I
think it is still on the OSM map.
It seems there could be a way to mark a location with "x was here" but
that could become a huge mess
Have others h
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 21:40:57 -0400
Richard Welty wrote:
> On 9/4/15 5:09 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> > So, there is nothing that a relation brings to the table that a way
> > does not? I mean, it is clear that for the purposes of drawing, they
> > are the same. But then are they
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:11:26 -0500
Toby Murray wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> >
> > Strangely, I am finding that some of the cities in California _are_
> > in the system, but as ways and not as relations. This seems odd,
> > but we will
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:06:33 +0200
Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
>
> > It has occurred to me that there will probably need to be a
> > "boundary watcher" tool, which can let an interested group know
> > about it when a bou
48838 | United States of America
| country |
| 3 | NULL | Sunnyvale Elementary
School District | school district |
++--+--+---------+
As you can see, the relation for the SESD still needs to be defined.
And there ar
Hello -
I am on a quest to learn more about how administrative boundaries can
be managed as relations. I have a bit of experience with these
things, but I am discovering the limitations of my knowledge also.
Which was the point, actually.
I would like to be able to suggest that governmental enti
21 matches
Mail list logo