On Saturday, August 31, 2002, 10:17:31 PM, ETM wrote:
E> My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
E> cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
E> does not have that capability?
AVG will notify you. The only thing it won't do is *certify* messag
Hello ETM,
On Saturday, 31. August 2002 at 17:17:31 [GMT -0400] you wrote:
> My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
> cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
> does not have that capability? I am not quick to "open" unknown
> items but I
Hello ETM,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, at 17:17:31 [GMT -0400] (which was 5:17:31
PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote:
> My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
> cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
> does not have that capability?
It will catch them. It's
Hello James
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, you wrote
> As Leif mentions, these are nested messages. And I believe
> nested messages are actually scanned (after all they are
> attachments themselves). But what do not get scanned are the
> the attachments of those nested messages. So, better sta
Hello ETM,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 13:49:09 [GMT -0400] (which was 1:49:09
PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote:
> Limitations
> Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the
> anti-virus plugin interface of The Bat!. The plugin is called
> only on message attachments. Outgoing messages are scann
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 at 15:48:22 [GMT +0700], you wrote:
TF> Security through obscurity? I don't know what an embedded message
TF> is. I have never come across this term in the RFC's. I can only
TF> assume that it means the same as above - a plaintext message is
TF> not scanned. Thi
Hello ETM,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:49:09 -0400 GMT (31/08/02, 00:49 +0700 GMT),
ETM wrote:
E> Can someone expand on the ramifications of these statements?
E> Limitations
E> Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the anti-virus
E> plugin interface of The Bat!. The plugin is called on
Sh'mae The,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 14:31:28 [GMT -0400] (or 19:31 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG/TB limitations and issues' you wrote:
E> Thanks, Adam. I am not interested in the
E> advertisement-certification feature so that was not a
E> problem. I am using 1.60c -- th
Hi ETM,
on Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:33:01 -0400GMT (30.08.02, 20:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
E> As I just mentioned to Adam, my TB is working so well, I haven't been
E> inclined to "fix it" when it wasn't "broke". Are there exceptional
E> reasons for up
On Friday, August 30, 2002, you wrote
> I'm sorry not to be able to answer your actual question, but how about
> updating The Bat!? Your X-mailer header states yours is 1.60c. ;-)
As I just mentioned to Adam, my TB is working so well, I haven't
been inclined to "fix it" when it wasn't "broke".
On Friday, August 30, 2002, you wrote
> As long as you're using 1.61 then not a problem.
E>> Embedded messages are not currently scanned. According to producers of The
E>> Bat!, this problem should be fixed in the version 1.62 of The Bat!
> Only for mime digests etc, or groups of messages
Hi Elaine,
on Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:49:09 -0400GMT (30.08.02, 19:49 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
E> Embedded messages are not currently scanned. According to producers of
E> The Bat!, this problem should be fixed in the version 1.62 of The Bat!
I'm sorry
Sh'mae The,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 13:49:09 [GMT -0400] (or 18:49 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG/TB limitations and issues' you wrote:
E> I am considering changing my AV program. I noticed these
E> limitations on the AVG website. Can someone expand on the
E> ramificat
I am considering changing my AV program. I noticed these
limitations on the AVG website. Can someone expand on the
ramifications of these statements? Many thanks in advance.
Elaine
Limitations
Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the anti-virus plugin interface of
The Bat!. Th
14 matches
Mail list logo
