Hello Terry,
> Cool! I'll have to save this to show to my significant other. I'm not
> often correct.
Hey! I can say you are correct as many times as you wish. And for free,
I won't even ask for a beer ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.00.6
Winamp PL
Hi Miguel,
> I think your interpretation is correct.
Cool! I'll have to save this to show to my significant other. I'm not
often correct.
--
Regards,
Terry
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
Current version is
Hello Terry,
> Of course, I could be wrong about this as it is my interpretation of
> Graham's writings. If I am, I hope someone will let me know.
I think your interpretation is correct.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.00.6
Winamp OFF:
___
On Monday, September 29, 2003 at 11:03 PM, David wrote:
> I would be happy to supply a lot of spam messages to folks who need
> some samples for training purposes! ;-)
Thanks for the offer, but I get enough myself. :)
With all the talk about spam on the list lately, I thought I'd share
some inf
Hello David,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:03:19 PM, you wrote:
DRA> Hello, Keith:
DRA> Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote:
DRA> (snip)
KR>>I Just switched from PopFile KR> to SpamBayes (snip)
KR>>(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR> of (snip)
KR>>a pain to
Hello David,
On 29 Sep 2003 at 17:46:17 -0400 GMT [23:46 CEST] you wrote:
DRA> So none of these are usable until I upgrade:
DRA> BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's "Known filter" approach.
DRA> Correct? Thank you.
No, incorrect. Of these only BayesIt is a Plugin. Popfile, Spampal and
I also was using K9 with the lower version of TB!
Elaine
Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:46:17 PM, David R. Austen wrote:
DRA> So none of these are usable until I upgrade:
DRA> BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's "Known filter" approach.
DRA> Correct? Thank you.
I can't speak for the others, but Popfile works fine here with 1.62, &
with ear
Hello, Keith:
Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote:
(snip)
KR>I Just switched from PopFile KR> to SpamBayes (snip)
KR>(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR> of (snip)
KR>a pain to set up--for me, at least--but I finally got it KR>
KR>working today and it has great
Hello, Andre:
Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:11:24 PM, you wrote:
AW> You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since
AW> 2.0.
So none of these are usable until I upgrade:
BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's "Known filter" approach.
Correct? Thank you.
--
Best wishes
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Monday, September 29, 2003, 4:46:01 AM, David wrote:
> So these are the solutions mentioned which are working well for some
> of you:
> Popfile, SpamPal, K9 and the Bat's "Known filter" approach.
> Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else?
David, I mis
Hello David,
On 29 Sep 2003 at 15:25:29 -0400 GMT [21:25 CEST] you wrote:
DRA> Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too,
DRA> and I don't know how I forgot to put it on my list.
You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since 2.0.
So unless you intent t
Hello, Mogens:
Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:15:53 AM, you wrote:
MH> This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun
MH> to use. I actually look forward to spam so I can train the filter!
Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too,
and I don't know ho
Hello David,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 17:11, you wrote:
DRA> Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else?
This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun to use. I actually
look forward to spam so I can train the filter!
--
Regards,
Mogens
Using The Bat! Ve
Hello, Miguel, Paul John and Mark:
Thank you, all, for your help with the filtering "roundup" I had
proposed. I want to implement Bayesian filtering and am looking for
best practices and products. of course that's always going to be
somewhat subjective.
So these are the solutions mentioned which
Hello John,
Saturday, September 27, 2003, 1:41:59 PM, you wrote:
>> Many of us use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), but there are
>> others.
JP> I find that SpamPal, after a couple of days "training", is picking up
JP> almost 100% of the spam.
JP> www.spampal.org
Finally started usi
Paul Berger, [PB] wrote:
PB> This leaves everything else to sit in the InBox. Here you can giv it
PB> a quick glance before deleting the lot.
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this repl
Hi Michael,
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, at 12:40:17 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:40:17
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> Many of us use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), but there are
> others.
I find that SpamPal, after a couple of days "training", is picking up
almost 100% of the spam.
www
You will probably receive better solutions from others. But my simple
approach is to filter all Welcome mail into folders, leaving the
unknown-unwelcome mail in the general InBox.
Filter for specific known items into appropriate folders, followed by
the last filter, being The Bat's Known filter to
Hello, Granville:
Saturday, September 27, 2003, 5:41:36 AM, you wrote:
(snip)
GC> Can the Bat! deal with this kind GC> of Spam or is it necessary to
GC> get another programme to do this GC> work.
My dear Batters, could we have a concise, succinct roundup of helpful
advice on solutions (
Hello Granville,
> Can the Bat! deal with this kind of Spam or is it necessary to get
> another programme to do this work.
Many of us use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), but there are
others.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.00.6
Winamp OFF:
This is a forwarded message
From: Granville Cousins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 1:21:12 AM
Subject: Spam
===8<==Original message text===
Hello Mailing List,
I am receiving allot of spam. When the messages arrive which I do no
22 matches
Mail list logo
