-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Johannes,
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 20:09:41, you wrote:
JMP I was talking with my own experience in mind, which is the
JMP 100% digital phone network in Europe. As you can get ISDN in every
JMP (!!) lost corner around here, thus having
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 08:55:47, you wrote:
TF Especially, please do not blow your postings up to over 7K just
TF because of this S/Mime. Some people pay internet charges per
TF download time; this list is meant to assist people
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 09:51:38, you wrote:
TF Also, it's not one message that may take longer. Take a list of 100
TF postings per day, and imagine each posting comes 4 or 5K extra.
I actually made that point clear in my post and it has been snipped to
falsify my opinion and
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 08/08/2000 at 10:39, you wrote:
I own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first
glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really
checks the headers?
Same people who bother to check the signatures ;)
Basically what TB needs is
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 10:48:05, you wrote:
TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to me.
TF Please do not send S/Mime signatures. In this relase version which I
TF am using here in the office, and for which this list is anyway, your
TF certificate
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 11:16:36, you wrote:
JMP There is a S/MIME 1.45 release...
TF You'll find it on the beta page ;-)
It hasn't got a beta suffix though.
--
Jamie Dainton
Tuesday, August 08, 2000 11:31:32
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
Windows 98 4.10
mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 11:43:24, you wrote:
TF Hi Jamie,
TF On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:19:37 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 18:19 +0800GMT),
TF Jamie Dainton wrote:
TF Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing
TF
Hi Thomas,
...
JD I do not think it is necessary to decrease our security to
JD accommodate the minority of users who have a very low bandwidth
JD connection.
TF Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing
TF list only for high-bandwidth privileged users?
Clearly NO.
I
8 matches
Mail list logo