Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 09:51:38, you wrote: TF> Also, it's not one message that may take longer. Take a list of 100 TF> postings per day, and imagine each posting comes 4 or 5K extra. I actually made that point clear in my post and it has been snipped to falsify my opinion and allow you to make an unjustified argument. JD>Even for 180 messages that's only 3 minutes extra Personally I think replies should be edited to reduce the length but not to alter the original meaning. TF>Not everybody lives in the UK, you know. Yes. most people in the US/France/Japan etc get much better connections than us poor Brits. I mean have you seen our phone system. Parts of it are still clockwork <g>. -- Jamie Dainton Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:07:31 The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 Windows 98 4.10 2222 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=sendKey
- OT: We Be Good! (was Re[2]: List server rules... Marco Qualizza
- Re: OT: We Be Good! (was Re[2]: List serv... Jamie Dainton
- Re: List server rules Deryk Lister
- Re[2]: List server rules Jamie Dainton [Bat]
- Re: List server rules Mark Aston
- OT? S/MIME & PGP (inspired by: Re[2]:... Bailey, Jason
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (inspired by... Jamie Dainton
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (inspir... Thomas Fernandez
- Re[2]: OT? S/MIME & PGP ... Jamie Dainton
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Thomas Fernandez
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Jamie Dainton
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Thomas Fernandez
- Re[2]: OT? S/MIME & PGP ... Jamie Dainton
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Thomas Fernandez
- Re[2]: OT? S/MIME & PGP ... Jamie Dainton
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Thomas Fernandez
- Re[2]: OT? S/MIME & PGP ... Wolfgang Kynast
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Marck D. Pearlstone
- Re[2]: OT? S/MIME & PGP ... Jamie Dainton
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Curtis
- Re: OT? S/MIME & PGP (in... Chuck Mattsen