It detects as MT7650 by OpenBSD 6.0 after some code modification, not
MT7601U. Many sources like WikiDevi says that TP-LINK Archer T2UH has
MT7610U and somewhere I found that is equivalent to RT2860, but OpenBSD
detects is as MT7650. I haven't opened the stick to check the model
exactly. Going to
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:47:47AM +0900, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:42:13PM +0300, Denis wrote:
> > Having trouble with TP-LINK AC600 Archer T2UH based on Ralink's MT7650
> > chipset with run driver on OpenBSD 6.0-stable with all the latest source
> > tree patches
"Michael W. Lucas" wrote:
|On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
|> It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the \
|> author" and
|> "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your
|>
Sebastian Benoit wrote:
|Steffen Nurpmeso(stef...@sdaoden.eu) on 2017.03.24 14:03:45 +0100:
|> Bob Beck wrote:
...
|> According to [1] the chosen license is however the "best" academic
|> license, and the only one which allows patent protection. Best in
Fixes typo in spelling of "attachment".
Index: faq4.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq4.html,v
retrieving revision 1.503
diff -u -p -r1.503 faq4.html
--- faq4.html 16 Mar 2017 19:56:07 - 1.503
+++ faq4.html 24 Mar 2017 17:08:52
For individuals who are unaware, I wanted to point out the J-core project.
http://www.j-core.org
It's a "clean-room open source" re-implementation of the SuperH instruction
set. They're currently debating what sort of MMU they should use
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:58:29PM -0400, David Hill wrote:
> This diff converts the existing three bcopy's to memcpy or memmove.
> The memcpy's are on freshly malloc'd memory so no overlap.
As tc and tdb are properly aligned malloc(9)ed data and tc_dst and
tdb_dst are sockaddr_union fields
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55:10AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and
> > "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your
> >
Just updating the copyright to 2017 for the anoncvs page.
Index: anoncvs.html.head
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/build/mirrors/anoncvs.html.head,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -p -r1.61 anoncvs.html.head
--- anoncvs.html.head22 Oct
Added the appropriate hyphens in “32 bit” and “64 bit” under “Hardware Support”
Index: faq1.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq1.html,v
retrieving revision 1.213
diff -u -p -r1.213 faq1.html
--- faq1.html 12 Mar 2017
Hey,
I think there is a typo in relayd.conf(5).
X-Forwarded-By should be the server $SERVER_ADDR instead of the client
$REMOTE_ADDR.
X-Forwarded-For is the client (correct).
diff --git a/usr.sbin/relayd/relayd.conf.5 b/usr.sbin/relayd/relayd.conf.5
index 8bed93efa1f..5f3eb0b2f9a 100644
---
Hello -
This diff converts the existing three bcopy's to memcpy or memmove.
The memcpy's are on freshly malloc'd memory so no overlap.
OK?
Index: netinet/ip_ipcomp.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_ipcomp.c,v
retrieving
Hi,
There is a race in dosendsyslog() which resulted in a crash on a
5.9 system. sosend(syslogf->f_data, ...) was called with a NULL
pointer. So syslogf is not NULL, f_data is NULL and f_count is 1.
The file structure is ref counted, but the global variable syslogf
is not protected. So it may
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and
> "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your
> rights", which is morally and legally wrong.
It's very simple. Four words.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:42:13PM +0300, Denis wrote:
> Having trouble with TP-LINK AC600 Archer T2UH based on Ralink's MT7650
> chipset with run driver on OpenBSD 6.0-stable with all the latest source
> tree patches installed.
Our run(4) driver does not yet support this chipset. Additional
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:56:08PM +0300, Denis wrote:
> Have Atheros AR9280+AR7010 USB stick athn(4).
> Long ago I tested it with OpenBSD 5.6 in Host AP mode 5GHz band, it does
> not work as AP but successful in BSS in both supported bands.
>
> On OpenBSD 6.0 situation is different. It is
Steffen Nurpmeso(stef...@sdaoden.eu) on 2017.03.24 14:03:45 +0100:
> Bob Beck wrote:
> ...
>
> Disclaimer: i have read about licenses many years ago (likely over
> a decade, i stopped reading the german computer magazine c't
> somewhen in 2005). I like and use the ISC license
Bob Beck wrote:
...
Disclaimer: i have read about licenses many years ago (likely over
a decade, i stopped reading the german computer magazine c't
somewhen in 2005). I like and use the ISC license that your
project has chosen and fosters whenever i can.
According to [1] the
Hello,
I'm attaching patch, which removes stack-as-a-global variable.
it's updated patch [1] to current tree.
sorry for being pushy advocating my old, rusty patch.
thanks and
regards
sasha
[1]
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:33:18 -0700
> From: Mike Larkin
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:20:07PM +0100, Simon Mages wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on some machines i saw some unknown enhanced capabilities. After
> > looking into it i saw that
> > on some intel chipsets there
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:48:10 -0400
> From: lice...@openssl.org
> To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
> Subject: OpenSSL License change
[...]
> We are asking for your permission to change the licence for your
> contribution. Please visit this link to respond; you will have a chance
[...]
> If we
> On 24 Mar 2017, at 3:51 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> it is great that someone found a way to convert between licenses.
>
> AGPL -> GPL -> ISC -> PD
pfSense went through with this, being a 2-Clause BSD fork of m0n0wall,
going through a 6-Clause ESF and CLA (all your
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:51:06 -0600
"Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Dude, you are being melodramatic
>
> it is great that someone found a way to convert between licenses.
>
> AGPL -> GPL -> ISC -> PD
>
> thumbs up to the people who found a shortcut
>
Now this is genius.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:20:07PM +0100, Simon Mages wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on some machines i saw some unknown enhanced capabilities. After
> looking into it i saw that
> on some intel chipsets there actually is a capability with id 0x0.
> This capability contains some
> registers of the Advanced
24 matches
Mail list logo