remm2004/09/22 23:55:26
Modified:webapps/docs/config ajp.xml host.xml
webapps/docs balancer-howto.xml connectors.xml index.xml
tomcat-docs.xsl
Log:
- Docs updates, mostly to the connectors page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +9
remm2004/09/22 23:56:08
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves
ErrorReportValve.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
DigesterFactory.java
Log:
- Fix imports.
Revision Changes
remm2004/09/22 23:58:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
ContextConfig.java ContextRuleSet.java
Added:
remm2004/09/22 23:59:09
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
ParserController.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java
Log:
- Fix imports.
Revision ChangesPath
1.55 +0 -1
remm2004/09/23 00:03:28
Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager
JMXProxyServlet.java HTMLManagerServlet.java
StatusManagerServlet.java ManagerServlet.java
Log:
- Fix some deprecation warnings.
- Fix
Hi, there,
Apache is a C application while Tomcat is in pure Java. Would you
please complain the mechanism for the communication between these two?
Especially, does it use shared memory or a temporary file or sockets?
In details,
1. It is feasible and straightforward to implement if using a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31264.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kan Deng wrote:
Hi, there,
Apache is a C application while Tomcat is in pure Java. Would you
please complain the mechanism for the communication between these two?
Especially, does it use shared memory or a temporary file or sockets?
It uses sockets and AJP13 protocol for communication.
Would
Hi again.
Is there really nobody who can tell me something about the output of
jkstatus?
Please help.
Kind regards.
Olli.
Hi all.
Who can tell me, where I can find information about the output of jkstatus
(documentation, reference)?
I have found many sites with instructions about how
MT,
Many thanks for the prompt reply. I read into the document, however,
didn't find the answer to my question as following,
3. If using sockets, jdk 1.4 has only socket for TCP and UDP. But when
the apache and tomcat are deployed in the same machine, isn't it an
overhead to go down to the lower
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kan Deng wrote:
MT,
Many thanks for the prompt reply. I read into the document, however,
didn't find the answer to my question as following,
3. If using sockets, jdk 1.4 has only socket for TCP and UDP. But when
the apache and tomcat are deployed in the same machine, isn't it an
overhead to go
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31382.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Informations.txt
.exe (in Informations.zip)
The file is deleted.
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Textfile.txt
.exe (in Textfile.zip)
The file is deleted.
Hi,
I might take a stab at this later today, using my first approach: secure will become
an attribute of the ProtocolHandler interface. The Connector will retain its
getSecure/setSecure methods, but they'll just pass through to the ProtocolHandler.
That way the attribute will only be in one
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I might take a stab at this later today, using my first approach: secure will become an attribute of the ProtocolHandler interface. The Connector will retain its getSecure/setSecure methods, but they'll just pass through to the ProtocolHandler. That way the attribute
Hi,
Alright ;) That saved me some effort ;) Forget my suggestion, and I'll leave this
issue open for now. There are enough other ones for me to look at ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Alright ;) That saved me some effort ;) Forget my suggestion, and I'll leave this issue open for now. There are enough other ones for me to look at ;)
Well, you can do that part, but not the way you suggested.
In the meantime, I'll do what Peter suggested and clean
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Alright ;) That saved me some effort ;) Forget my suggestion, and
I'll leave this issue open for now. There are enough other ones for
me to look at ;)
Well, you can do that part, but not the way you suggested.
In the meantime, I'll do what
Hi,
An option would be to
tie the Connector object creation with the creation of the protocol
handler instance.
That makes sense anyways. Why delay, since the Connect isn't useful
without a ProtocolHandler anyways?
Yoav
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
http://www.theserverside.com/talks/VendorPerspectives/Mainsoft/interview
.tss
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
http://www.theserverside.com/talks/VendorPerspectives/Mainsoft/interview
.tss
Yes, indeed :)
Almost a year ago I proposed a project that would enable Tomcat to
seemesly integrate the legacy code. Something like moving the
perspective from being an backend to becoming an
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31388.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28727.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28727.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31388.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2004/09/23 13:14:49
Modified:catalina/src/bin catalina.bat
webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 31362
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/catalina.bat
Index: catalina.bat
yoavs 2004/09/23 13:17:14
Modified:catalina/src/bin Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 catalina.bat
webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 31362
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.9.2.2 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31362.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
http://www.theserverside.com/talks/VendorPerspectives/Mainsoft/interview
.tss
Yes, indeed :)
Almost a year ago I proposed a project that would enable Tomcat to
seemesly integrate the legacy code. Something like moving the
perspective from being an backend to
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
http://www.theserverside.com/talks/VendorPerspectives/Mainsoft/interview
.tss
Yes, indeed :)
Almost a year ago I proposed a project that would enable Tomcat to
seemesly integrate the legacy code. Something like moving the
perspective
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31392.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31392.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31392.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31354.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
42 matches
Mail list logo