t; > >> but
> > >> not too bad.
> > >> 3) Configuring two servlet filters conditionally is a bit complex :-). We
> > >> can also disable the /junit unit with an init-parameter "junit.enabled"
> > >> set
> > >> to false.
>> 3) Configuring two servlet filters conditionally is a bit complex :-). We
> >> can also disable the /junit unit with an init-parameter "junit.enabled"
> >> set
> >> to false.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Raymond
> >>
> >> - Or
l Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
If this is just for itests then to keep runtime cleaner how about moving
it
all out of the main runtime code into the maven-web-junit
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
>
>
> > If this is just for itests th
"ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
If this is just for itests then to keep runtime cleaner how about moving
it
all out of the main runtime code into the maven-web-junit module? So move
We
, we can reuse most of our itests to run under the web
> > environment
> > without little efforts to convert. The test cases stay as regular Junit
> > test
> > cases. The client side doesn't have to write HtmlUnit to deal with the
> > HTTP
> > conversation
-
> From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
>
>
> > By going with this approach, we can reutilize a lot of existing tests
> > (our iTests for
, February 03, 2008 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
By going with this approach, we can reutilize a lot of existing tests
(our iTests for example), instead of having to create/migrate new
tests using htmlUnit. As for cargo, it does not support all the
hos
Hi,
What problem did you with maven 2.0.5? I'm running maven 2.0.8 now.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR pack
My personal opinion
> - 2.0.7 and later?
On Feb 3, 2008 2:29 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have checked in my changes.
>
> Your changes break the build for me as they require Maven 2.0.6. Our 1.1
> release worked with Maven 2.0.5.
>
By going with this approach, we can reutilize a lot of existing tests
(our iTests for example), instead of having to create/migrate new
tests using htmlUnit. As for cargo, it does not support all the
hosting platforms we are supporting, right ?
On Feb 3, 2008 2:42 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I have checked in my changes.
Your changes break the build for me as they require Maven 2.0.6. Our 1.1
release worked with Maven 2.0.5.
I'm installing the latest Maven (2.0.8) now but what do people prefer?
- continue to work with 2.0.5 and later
- 2.0.6 and later?
-
On Feb 1, 2008 5:41 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Automation+of+itests+in+web+applications
> ).
>
> In our WAR packaging scheme, we package SCA artifacts
;Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
Raymond Feng wrote:
A quick update: I managed to get the automation working with Geronimo
2.0.2 too using the geronimo-maven-plugin.
ebruary 02, 2008 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
Great Raymond,
I very interested in using this approach to automate the execution
of our iTests in a web app container. I playing a little with some
iTests to try to make them ready to use this. From my initial
investig
Great Raymond,
I very interested in using this approach to automate the execution
of our iTests in a web app container. I playing a little with some
iTests to try to make them ready to use this. From my initial
investigations, I couldn't really change the packaging schema for a
given project ba
o:
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 9:41 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
Hi,
(Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Automation+of+itests+in+web+applications).
In our WAR packaging scheme
ry 01, 2008 9:41 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
Hi,
(Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Automation+of+itests+in+web+applications).
In our WAR packaging scheme, we package SCA artifa
Hi,
(Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Automation+of+itests+in+web+applications).
In our WAR packaging scheme, we package SCA artifacts with Tuscany runtime
jars in a WAR so that it can be deployed to a web cont
19 matches
Mail list logo
