Hello,
Is there a way to get a list of installed python modules and their versions ?
i.e. I would like to know if matplotlib is installed on my computer and what
version is it.
And so with other modules.
Thanks
Eli
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.o
Alan Gauld wrote:
"Norman Khine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Frankly I'd use a database. Just load the data into it using Python.
Then execute SQL querioes to get the counts etc.
Not really an option to use SQL just for this.
I'm curious why?
It seems to suggest that using SQL is somehow a
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kent Johnson wrote:
>> for first in x:
>> for second in y:
>>if first and second and (first, second) in table:
>
> I don't really see this clearly as I may have n'th values for 'x' and n'th
> values for 'y' so I will nee
"Norman Khine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Frankly I'd use a database. Just load the data into it using
Python.
Then execute SQL querioes to get the counts etc.
Not really an option to use SQL just for this.
I'm curious why?
It seems to suggest that using SQL is somehow a big deal?
But with
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>>>
>>> if isinstance(x, list):
>>> for item in x:
>>> x = item
>>
>> This just assigns x to the last element of the list
>
> Oops, yes, I said
Kent Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
x = getattr(brain, horizontal)
if isinstance(x, list):
for item in x:
x = item
This just assigns x to the last element of the list, it doesn't
Hi,
Alan Gauld wrote:
"Norman Khine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Here is the 'full' code as such which gets the data from the files.
Unfortunately trying to read this is still difficult since we don't
know what the structure of x, horizontal_criterias, vertical_criterias,
or brains is like.
"Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
if isinstance(x, list):
for item in x:
x = item
This just assigns x to the last element of the list
Oops, yes, I said the first but in fact reassigning x does
not stop the loop, it seems the loop works on a
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>x = getattr(brain, horizontal)
>if isinstance(x, list):
>for item in x:
>x = item
This just assigns x to the last element of the list, it doesn't
process the whole
"Norman Khine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Here is the 'full' code as such which gets the data from the files.
Unfortunately trying to read this is still difficult since we don't
know what the structure of x, horizontal_criterias,
vertical_criterias,
or brains is like.
## Classify t
Hi,
Here is the 'full' code as such which gets the data from the files.
## Classify the users
table = {}
table[('', '')] = 0
for x in horizontal_criterias:
table[(x['id'], '')] = 0
for y in vertical_criterias:
table[('', y['id'])] =
Hi Norman,
Norman Khine wrote:
>
> for brain in brains:
> x = getattr(brain, horizontal)
> x = string.join(x, '' )
> y = getattr(brain, vertical)
> y = string.join(y, '' )
> if x and y and (x, y) in table:
> table
Hi,
Sorry, but this did not work.
I have done this, which returns the values I want (sort of)
for brain in brains:
x = getattr(brain, horizontal)
if isinstance(x, list):
for item in x:
x = item
else:
"Norman Khine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
but when I run this, I get the following error on the line:
if x and y and (x, y) in table:
TypeError: list objects are unhashable
Please post the entire error. The tiny bit you posted was
not overly helpful, usually the stacjk trace contains the
ac
Le Monday 30 June 2008 21:31:35, vous avez écrit :
> Thanks,
> but where do i replace the x with tuple(x)
>
Whenever x is hashed, ie used as a key in a dictionary. You said you have:
> >> table[(x, y)] += 1
> >> where:
> >>
> >> x = ['airlines-scheduled', 'airport-car-parking']
Thanks,
but where do i replace the x with tuple(x)
Norman
Cédric Lucantis wrote:
Le Monday 30 June 2008 20:55:36 Norman Khine, vous avez écrit :
Hello,
I would like to count list items but am not 100% sure how to do it.
Here is what I have so far:
for brain in brains:
Le Monday 30 June 2008 20:55:36 Norman Khine, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to count list items but am not 100% sure how to do it.
>
> Here is what I have so far:
>
> for brain in brains:
> x = getattr(brain, horizontal)
> y = getattr(brain, vertical
Hello,
I would like to count list items but am not 100% sure how to do it.
Here is what I have so far:
for brain in brains:
x = getattr(brain, horizontal)
y = getattr(brain, vertical)
if x and y and (x, y) in table:
table[(x, y)] += 1
But i only play with Lisp these days so am well out of date.
The best Lisp tutorial IMHO is the How To Design Programs
web site/book (htdp.org?)
Yes, HTDP is one of the very good ones. I'd strongly recommend it. As a
full disclosure thing: I'm involved with the folks doing HTDP: I'm not a
n
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Well, my desire to extend emacs has made me want to get more
serious about it.
The emacs community is pretty good for supporting elispers but
I don't know of any tutor style lists. ( So far as I know this list is
fairly
unique! There is something like it for PHP b
Hi all,
I've an off-topic query; hope no one minds.
I've poked into the lisp world a bit before (started SICP, etc., but
never used it in anger), and put it on my `when I've more time' shelf.
Well, my desire to extend emacs has made me want to get more serious
about it.
Does anyone kno
"quantrum75" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
Hi everybody
Hi,
I think the key to your question is here:
a=((1,),(2,),(3,),(4,),(5,))
I need the comma since it is going into an excel sheet.
I think you are confused between tuples and comma separated
strings - which is what yo
Sincerely sorry for spamming everybody. Dint know about yahoo's quirks
regarding html attachments..
Hopefully this works.
Hi everybody
I have a simple newbie kind of questions. I have tried hard to solve it, but
couldn't figure it out.
The problem is,
I want to make a tuple of tuples or a list o
Hi everybodyI have a simple newbie kind of questions. I have tried hard to solve it, but couldn't figure it out.The problem is,I want to make a tuple of tuples or a list of lists in a iterative fashion in the following format. For example,a=[[1,],[2,],[3,],[4,],[5,]]or a=((1,),(2,),(3,),(4,),(5,))I
Hi everybodyI have a simple newbie kind of questions. I have tried hard to solve it, but couldn't figure it out.The problem is,I want to make a tuple of tuples or a list of lists in a iterative fashion in the following format. For example,a=[[1,],[2,],[3,],[4,],[5,]]or a=((1,),(2,),(3,),(4,),(5,))I
ith a built-in
> would help. Maybe not?
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Dinesh
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Kent Johnson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Dinesh B Vadhia <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* tutor@python.org <mail
Alan Gauld wrote:
> One possibility is that the javascript fetches the list back on the
> first few characters and caches it on the browser
Here is an autocomplete widget I use that can do exactly that:
http://www.dyve.net/jquery/?autocomplete
Kent
___
"Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> application/service. Each time a user inputs a character, the
>> character
>> is sent to the backend Python program which searches for the
>> character
>> in a list of >10,000 string items. Once it finds the character,
>> the
>> backend will return
Dinesh B Vadhia wrote:
> Kent
>
> I'm using a Javascript autocomplete plugin for an online web
> application/service. Each time a user inputs a character, the character
> is sent to the backend Python program which searches for the character
> in a list of >10,000 string items. Once it finds
My guess, though I'm not sure, is that google uses hashes...
why? Because they're a *ahem* load faster than loops, and the reason
is they replace the repetitive nature of a loop by using some type of
formula. Exactly /how/ this is implemented, I'm not sure.
A simple example of the speed differenc
i think you are using ajax ... which undoubdetly uses an sql database since
its based on queries run from whithin the application in the browser
whithout the need for refreshing the page ... i would suggest you try
serching internet for something like "google autocomplete feature" & i
guess the qu
also if you need to go for 2 results I propose you use filters &
interactive menus which will help you tailor the query to the users desires
& thus limit the query results.
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
"Dinesh B Vadhia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote i
> I'm using a Javascript autocomplete plugin for an online
> web application/service. Each time a user inputs a character,
> the character is sent to the backend Python program which
> searches for the character in a list of >10,000 string items.
ed sensible that replacing the for loop with a built-in would help. Maybe
not?
Hope that helps.
Dinesh
- Original Message -
From: Kent Johnson
To: Dinesh B Vadhia
Cc: tutor@python.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Tutor] List comprehensions
Dinesh B Vadhia wr
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could use
> [ sys.stdout.write(some operation on item) for item in data ]
>
> but I consider this bad style and I seriously doubt you will see any
> difference in performance.
This really isn't a good idea. It will
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Dinesh B Vadhia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, let's start again.
This version really isn't any more helpful than the first one. I know
you corrected the sample code, but you haven't addressed any of the
fundamental questions that Kent or I asked.
> I want to
Dinesh B Vadhia wrote:
> Here is a for loop operating on a list of string items:
>
> data = ["string 1", "string 2", "string 3", "string 4", "string 5",
> "string 6", "string 7", "string 8", "string 9", "string 10", "string 11"]
>
> result = ""
> for item in data:
> result = item
> pr
a potentially better structure preferably a built-in.
>
> Hope this makes sense! Thank-you.
>
> Dinesh
>
>
>
> - Original Message - *From:* Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Dinesh B Vadhia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* tutor@python.org
> *Sent:
l Message -----
From: Kent Johnson
To: Dinesh B Vadhia
Cc: tutor@python.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Tutor] List comprehensions
Dinesh B Vadhia wrote:
> Here is a for loop operating on a list of string items:
>
> data = ["string 1", "str
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Jerry Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Dinesh B Vadhia
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to replace the for loop with a List Comrehension (or whatever) to
> > improve performance (as the data list will be >10,000]. At each sta
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Dinesh B Vadhia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to replace the for loop with a List Comrehension (or whatever) to
> improve performance (as the data list will be >10,000]. At each stage of
> the for loop I want to print the result ie.
List comprehensions are fo
Dinesh B Vadhia wrote:
> Here is a for loop operating on a list of string items:
>
> data = ["string 1", "string 2", "string 3", "string 4", "string 5",
> "string 6", "string 7", "string 8", "string 9", "string 10", "string 11"]
>
> result = ""
> for item in data:
> result = item + "\n"
>
Here is a for loop operating on a list of string items:
data = ["string 1", "string 2", "string 3", "string 4", "string 5", "string 6",
"string 7", "string 8", "string 9", "string 10", "string 11"]
result = ""
for item in data:
result = item + "\n"
print result
I want to replace the for loo
elis aeris wrote:
> arra = [0] * 10 ?
If you want a list of ten zeroes, yes.
A couple of suggestions:
Find a tutorial introduction to Python such as those on python.org, or
google for "dive into python", and go through the examples in there.
Also, use the interactive Python interpreter to try o
arra = [0] * 10 ?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Empty?
>
> array = []
>
> If you want to assign 10 "None", that would be:
>
> array = [None] * 10
>
> Andreas
>
> Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 17:03 -0700 schrieb elis aeris:
> > how do I create an emp
Empty?
array = []
If you want to assign 10 "None", that would be:
array = [None] * 10
Andreas
Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 17:03 -0700 schrieb elis aeris:
> how do I create an empy int array of 10?
> ___
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> http://
how do I create an empy int array of 10?
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Dinesh B Vadhia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For my web application, I need a list box with a search capability. An
> example is the Python documentation (hit the F1 key under Windows from IDLE)
> and specifically the Index list ie. context-sensitive search through
I know this isn't the right forum to ask but I'll try as someone might know.
For my web application, I need a list box with a search capability. An example
is the Python documentation (hit the F1 key under Windows from IDLE) and
specifically the Index list ie. context-sensitive search through a
At 06:41 PM 1/17/2008, bill.wu wrote:
>the tutor list has been strangely silent for a few days. Anyone know
>what has happened? why?
FYI I see 34 messages in my Eudora Tutor mailbox, dated 1/16 Pacific
Time (Eudora converts the datetimes to my time zone, PT).
Here's a screens
bill.wu wrote:
> the tutor list has been strangely silent for a few days. Anyone know
> what has happened? why?
I got about 20 e-mails from the list yesterday.
Do you consider this slient?
or do you maybe have a problem receiving me
the tutor list has been strangely silent for a few days. Anyone know
what has happened? why?
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
Richard Querin wrote:
> import itertools, operator
> for k, g in itertools.groupby(sorted(data), key=operator.itemgetter(0,
> 1, 2, 3)):
> print k, sum(item[4] for item in g)
>
>
>
> I'm trying to understand what's going on in the for statement but I'm
> having troubles. The i
On Nov 27, 2007 5:40 PM, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a two-liner using itertools.groupby() and operator.itemgetter:
>
> data = [['Bob', '07129', 'projectA', '4001',5],
> ['Bob', '07129', 'projectA', '5001',2],
> ['Bob', '07101', 'projectB', '4001',1],
> ['Bob', '07140', 'pr
Michael Langford wrote:
> What you want is a set of entries.
Not really; he wants to aggregate entries.
> # remove duplicate entries
> #
> # myEntries is a list of lists,
> #such as [[1,2,3],[1,2,"foo"],[1,2,3]]
> #
> s=set()
> [s.add(tuple(x)) for x in myEntries]
A set can be constructed d
> s=set()
> [s.add(tuple(x)) for x in myEntries]
> myEntries = [list(x) for x in list(s)]
This could be written more concisely as...
s = set(tuple(x) for x in myEntries)
myEntries = [list(x) for x in list(s)]
Generator expressions are really cool.
Not what the OP asked for exactly. He wanted to
What you want is a set of entries. Unfortunately, python lists are not
"hashable" which means you have to convert them to something hashable
before you can use the python set datatype.
What you'd like to do is add each to a set while converting them to a
tuple, then convert them back out of the se
bob gailer wrote:
> 2 - Sort the list. Create a new list with an entry for the first name,
> project, workcode. Step thru the list. Each time the name, project,
> workcode is the same, accumulate hours. When any of those change, create
> a list entry for the next name, project, workcode and agai
Richard Querin wrote:
> I'm trying to process a list and I'm stuck. Hopefully someone can help
> me out here:
>
> I've got a list that is formatted as follows:
> [Name,job#,jobname,workcode,hours]
>
> An example might be:
>
> [Bob,07129,projectA,4001,5]
> [Bob,07129,projectA,5001,2]
> [Bob,07101,pr
On 28/11/2007, Richard Querin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a list that is formatted as follows:
> [Name,job#,jobname,workcode,hours]
[...]
> Now I'd like to consolidate entries that are duplicates. Duplicates
> meaning entries that share the same Name, job#, jobname and workcode.
> So for
I'm trying to process a list and I'm stuck. Hopefully someone can help
me out here:
I've got a list that is formatted as follows:
[Name,job#,jobname,workcode,hours]
An example might be:
[Bob,07129,projectA,4001,5]
[Bob,07129,projectA,5001,2]
[Bob,07101,projectB,4001,1]
[Bob,07140,projectC,3001,3
Eric Brunson wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> Kent Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> I am building a list like this:
>>>
>>> tree = []
>>> for top in tops:
>>> l2 = level2(top)
>>> if l2:
>>> tree.append((top, l2))
>>>
>>> I would really like to turn this into a list
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Kent Johnson wrote:
>
>> I am building a list like this:
>>
>> tree = []
>> for top in tops:
>> l2 = level2(top)
>> if l2:
>> tree.append((top, l2))
>>
>> I would really like to turn this into a list comprehension:
>>
>> tree = [ (t
I decided you probably should also have a cleanup function since garbage
collection won't work now unless you explicitly clean the function. This
approach works, and also works if you call the function again after you've
called cleanup (it just runs the function 1 more time, then again, returns
the
"Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I would really like to turn this into a list comprehension:
>
> tree = [ (top, level2(top)) for top in tops if level2(top) ]
>
> but the call to level2() is expensive enough that I don't want to
> repeat
> it. Is there any way to do this or am I stuck w
Kent Johnson wrote:
> I am building a list like this:
>
> tree = []
> for top in tops:
> l2 = level2(top)
> if l2:
> tree.append((top, l2))
>
> I would really like to turn this into a list comprehension:
>
> tree = [ (top, level2(top)) for top in tops if
Decorate level2 with a decorator that caches:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/425445
--Michael
On 11/1/07, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am building a list like this:
>
> tree = []
> for top in tops:
> l2 = level2(top)
> if
I am building a list like this:
tree = []
for top in tops:
l2 = level2(top)
if l2:
tree.append((top, l2))
I would really like to turn this into a list comprehension:
tree = [ (top, level2(top)) for top in tops if level2(top) ]
but the call to level2() is
Hi
can someone help with this please?
i got to this point with help from the list.
from BeautifulSoup import BeautifulSoupdoc = ['Page
title', 'This is
paragraph one.', 'This is
paragraph two.', 'http://www.google.co.uk";>',
'http://www.bbc.co.uk";>', 'http:/
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:11:33PM +0100, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:06:05AM -0700, Dick Moores wrote:
>> Replying only to the list takes a bit of trouble. The default
>> behavior seems to be that the "Reply" button addresses the author
>> only and not the list; "Reply to al
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:33:16 -0700
> From: Dick Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Question re Tutor List Etiquette
> To: tutor@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 11:56 AM 8/14/2007, Kent Johnson wrote:
>Dick Moores wrote:
> > When sending a reply to a post, to the list, should we also address
> > the reply to the author of the post to which we are replying?
> > (There's gotta be an easier way to say that..) If we do so, then the
> > author gets a duplica
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:06:05AM -0700, Dick Moores wrote:
> Replying only to the list takes a bit of trouble. The default
> behavior seems to be that the "Reply" button addresses the author
> only and not the list; "Reply to all" addresses both the list, the
> author, and any others included
Dick Moores wrote:
> When sending a reply to a post, to the list, should we also address
> the reply to the author of the post to which we are replying?
> (There's gotta be an easier way to say that..) If we do so, then the
> author gets a duplicate of our reply.
This is configurable for each s
Dick Moores wrote:
> When sending a reply to a post, to the list, should we also address
> the reply to the author of the post to which we are replying?
> (There's gotta be an easier way to say that..) If we do so, then the
> author gets a duplicate of our reply.
>
> I've run some statistics (bu
Dick Moores wrote:
> When sending a reply to a post, to the list, should we also address
> the reply to the author of the post to which we are replying?
> (There's gotta be an easier way to say that..) If we do so, then the
> author gets a duplicate of our reply.
>
> I've run some statistics (bu
When sending a reply to a post, to the list, should we also address
the reply to the author of the post to which we are replying?
(There's gotta be an easier way to say that..) If we do so, then the
author gets a duplicate of our reply.
I've run some statistics (but no more bar graphs ;-) ). My
pearl jb wrote:
> I wanted to know "How to access the list elements which is in Dictionary"
>
> dict = {'John':['ph=919873673','res=91928827737'] , 'William' :
> ['ph=91983763','res=91837474848'] }
>
>
> I want the output to be
>
> 1. John res=91928827737
> 2. William ph=91983763
You can use
I wanted to know "How to access the list elements which is in Dictionary"
dict = {'John':['ph=919873673','res=91928827737'] , 'William' :
['ph=91983763','res=91837474848'] }
I want the output to be
1. John res=91928827737
2. William ph=91983763
-
On
* Ben Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070411 22:02]:
> I've got a list that contain a bunch of information, including the
> FQDN of a host.
>
> host_data=['foo.example.com', 'other unimportant data']
>
> I need to seperate the hostname from the domain name.
>
> This is how I'm doing it, and it work
I've got a list that contain a bunch of information, including the
FQDN of a host.
host_data=['foo.example.com', 'other unimportant data']
I need to seperate the hostname from the domain name.
This is how I'm doing it, and it work, but it seems *really* hacky.
Is there a better (or more pythony)
Kent Johnson wrote:
> Smith, Jeff wrote:
>
>> I'm getting use to using list iteration and comprehension but still have
>> some questions.
>>
>> 1. I know to replace
>> for i in range(len(list1)):
>> do things with list1[i]
>> with
>> for li in list1:
>> do things with li
Smith, Jeff wrote:
> I'm getting use to using list iteration and comprehension but still have
> some questions.
>
> 1. I know to replace
> for i in range(len(list1)):
> do things with list1[i]
> with
> for li in list1:
> do things with li
> but what if there are two lists t
I'm getting use to using list iteration and comprehension but still have
some questions.
1. I know to replace
for i in range(len(list1)):
do things with list1[i]
with
for li in list1:
do things with li
but what if there are two lists that you need to access in sync. Is
the
> Kirk Bailey wrote:
>> ok, here comes some code:
>>
>> f1=open(pagename,'r')
>> page=f1.readlines()
>> f1.close()
>>
>> at the end of which, the data is in page, which is a list. But
>> something strange is going on here. all the data is in a single cell!
>> it's a one cell list! Say what?
It s
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:21:26 +1300
"John Fouhy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kirk Bailey wrote:
> > > ok, here comes some code:
> > >
> > > f1=open(pagename,'r')
> > > page=f1.readlines()
> > > f1.close()
> > >
> > > at the end of which, the data is in page, which is a list. But
> > > something
> Kirk Bailey wrote:
> > ok, here comes some code:
> >
> > f1=open(pagename,'r')
> > page=f1.readlines()
> > f1.close()
> >
> > at the end of which, the data is in page, which is a list. But
> > something strange is going on here. all the data is in a single cell!
> > it's a one cell list! Say what
Kirk:
Please reply to this message, not the other one I sent,
and please reply on-list in the future, using the 'reply-all' button
rather than 'reply.'
Otherwise the message just goes to me instead of to everyone, which is
the default on this list.
This copy of your e-mail is forwarded to the lis
On 2/21/07, Kirk Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Discussion on or off list is saught. Constructive criticism will be
> graciously received and thanked.
Without links, pointers, code or anything grippable I find it
difficult to comment or discuss anything, since i haven't got the
faintes
Kirk Bailey wrote:
> ok, getting back to python and wikiness, I have a problem, this software
> of mine seems to exibit different behavior under the latest edition of
> python (2.5) than under the version used when I first wrote it (2.3).
>
> It loads the page file, but returns it as a list (whic
ok, getting back to python and wikiness, I have a problem, this software
of mine seems to exibit different behavior under the latest edition of
python (2.5) than under the version used when I first wrote it (2.3).
It loads the page file, but returns it as a list (which is correcft) of
one eleme
Dave Kuhlman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:28:21AM +, Tim Golden wrote:
>> Kent Johnson wrote:
>>> Tim Golden wrote:
field and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in cc: My problem there is that I usually
don't want to send the originating individual a private copy
of an email he/she is goin
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:28:21AM +, Tim Golden wrote:
> Kent Johnson wrote:
> > Tim Golden wrote:
> >> field and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in cc: My problem there is that I usually
> >> don't want to send the originating individual a private copy
> >> of an email he/she is going to receive from the l
Greetings:
I just thought I'd throw my own hat into the ring. I'm trying out my
new, asbestos-free, flame-retardant underwear. ;^)
> -Original Message-
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:14:29 -0500
> From: "Michael P. Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj
Tim Golden schreef:
> I would take minor issue -- with you, and with the creators
> of Thunderbird which is my current mail client of choice. It
> looks to me as though you're suggesting that the reply-all
> button is there to reply to a list, whereas it seems to me
> to be there to reply to all th
On 2/16/07, ALAN GAULD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, the "standard behavior" at the time was that
> replies went back to the mailing list, not to the original sender.
But the mailing list was the original sender so it was all wonderfully
consistent. Reply goes to sender only, which hap
On 2/16/07, Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As to standard list behaviour, I don't know of any list thats been
around for more than say 10 years that uses Reply to send to All.
This seems to be a very recent thing. (And most of the lists I am
on have been around for much more than 10 years
Kent Johnson wrote:
> Tim Golden wrote:
>> field and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in cc: My problem there is that I usually
>> don't want to send the originating individual a private copy
>> of an email he/she is going to receive from the list in any
>> case, so I usually cut-and-paste around so that only the
Tim Golden wrote:
> field and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in cc: My problem there is that I usually
> don't want to send the originating individual a private copy
> of an email he/she is going to receive from the list in any
> case, so I usually cut-and-paste around so that only the list
> is in To: AFAIK, T
Tim Golden wrote:
> Alan Gauld wrote:
>> But its obvious there are two views at work here.
>
> (The one which sees an apostrophe in "it's" and the
> one which doesn't? ;)
>
> But, joking aside, I think you've summarised the situation
> quite well, and I suspect that -- given the what must be
> th
501 - 600 of 705 matches
Mail list logo
