Dear jackfriend,
In message <39c3dad3.3bd4.12910469457.coremail.jackfri...@163.com> you wrote:
>
> How can I use yaffs2 in uboot
...
> my2440 # ymount /flash
>
> yaffs: Mounting /flash
Looks good?
> my2440 # ywrm a 0x30008000 4
>
> Error opening file: -1
Maybe you try a "yls" first to ch
Has anyone come across (or written) a tool/script/makefile target to
pack u-boot into a SPI boot image (i.e. with boot header and config
symbols) to boot directly from SPI on the P2020RDB (or P1020 etc.)
and/or MPC8536DS? Would it be within the scope of u-boot to have such an
option?
Can
How can I use yaffs2 in uboot
I add CONFIG_YAFFS2 in /include/configs/smdk2410.h
my2440 # nand write 0x30008000 8 4
NAND write: device 0 offset 0x8, size 0x4
262144 bytes written: OK
my2440 #
my2440 # ymount /flash
yaffs: Mounting /flash
my2440 # ywrm a 0x30008000 4000
Asen Dimov wrote:
> Add the new board PM9G45 from Ronetix GmbH.
> * AT91SAM9G45 MCU at 400Mhz.
> * 128MB DDR2 SDRAM
> * 256MB NAND
> * 10/100 MBits Ethernet DP83848
> * Serial number chip DS2401
>
> The board is made as SODIMM200 module.
> For more info www.ronatix.at or i...@ronetix.at.
>
> Sign
During "./MAKEALL avr32" at least my toolchain gives the following warnings for
every board:
Configuring for atstk1002 board...
atmel_usart.c:21:2: warning: #warning Please update to use C structur SoC
access !
cmd_bdinfo.c: In function 'do_bdinfo':
cmd_bdinfo.c:295: warning: format '%d' expects
Add support for EMK TOP7000 CPU Module
Specifics:
1) create subdir board/emk/top7000 and files in it
2) create include/configs/top7000.h
3) update board/emk/common/vpd.c
4) add call to misc_init_r() to arch/avr32/lib/board.c
5) create arch/avr32/include/asm/unaligned.h to
fix zlib.c compilatio
Reinhard Meyer (-VC) schrieb:
if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong...
a 0x0d (CR) sneaked into the following line:
> hammerhead \
> - mimc200 \
> + mimc200 \
> + top7000 \
Please do not try to apply the patch. I will send a new one!
Add support for EMK TOP7000 CPU Module
Specifics:
1) create subdir board/emk/top7000 and files in it
2) create include/configs/top7000.h
3) update board/emk/common/vpd.c
4) add call to misc_init_r() to arch/avr32/lib/board.c
5) create arch/avr32/include/asm/unaligned.h to
fix zlib.c compilatio
Hello Reinhard,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Reinhard Meyer (-VC) <
reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de> wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> > Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)",
> >
> > In message <4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
> >> is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insis
Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)",
In message <4c0b8be7.7090...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>
> Is that documented somewhere? I see that the calling function in net.c
Probably only in the mailing list archives...
> does NOT care about any positive interger result. Will it care sometime
> in the futu
Reinhard Meyer (-VC) schrieb:
> Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
>> Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)",
>> The second problem is that I cannot seem to undo my previous commit in my
> tree, so any changes I do to my source would come out as a second patch.
> Would that be accepted?
>
> Or do you know what must be d
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)",
>
> In message <4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>> is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
>> my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
>
> I don't understand what you mean by "onl
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)",
>
> In message <4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>> is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
>> my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
>
> I don't understand what you mean by "onl
Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> Please pull u-boot-samsung/master.
> Thanks.
>
> The following changes since commit 922d27b596c179c5a7d68abe45ede5adb1b6589c:
> Minkyu Kang (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)",
In message <4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>
> is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
> my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
I don't understand what you mean by "only my port". Ben's comment that
b
Hello,
is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
Reinhard Meyer schrieb:
> Ben Warren schrieb:
>> Hello Reinhard,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Reinhard Meyer (-VC) <
>> reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.d
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Vipin KUMAR wrote:
>
>> From: Vipin KUMAR
>>
>> SPEAr310 and SPEAr320 SoCs have an extra ethernet controller. The
>> driver for this device is already supported by u-boot, so configuring
>> board configuration fi
17 matches
Mail list logo
