Re: [U-Boot] how to understand "uboot is 32bit program even it is in the 64bit mips"

We have dealt with this in our release of U-Boot since we only support 64-bit Linux. We use the n32 ABI with U-Boot and set it up to use a TLB entry to map U-Boot into a 32-bit addressable area. We have some special memcpy type routines that can handle the 64-bit addressing. All of our I/O regist

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for x86

Hi Raleigh, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Raleigh Boulware wrote: > I am looking at the source code for the sc520 and can not figure out which > board directory to look in. Which of the board plat form has the sc520? The only board which currently builds for the sc520 is the eNET board > Al

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] sh: Clean up rsk7264 board settings

Applied to next branch. Thanks. Nobuhiro 2011/6/9 Phil Edworthy : > Adjusted default settings so that we can boot zImages and uImages. > Removed unused settings, use default commands and where possible > calculate all other settings. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy > Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > -

Re: [U-Boot] IMX51 EVK Splash Screen

Please constrain your emails to the email list; I do not like direct comment or direct email. Stefano has fixed much of the IPU/Splash Screen stuff. A good deal of that is in current U-Boot tree, last I saw. I am now back on OMAP, so really don't have comment on this. Stefanfo might, but just p

[U-Boot] how to understand "uboot is 32bit program even it is in the 64bit mips"

I have a 64bit cnMips borad.In the mail list archives,it says "uboot is 32bit,even in the 64bit cpu." but how to understand that? I have a guess,is the 64bit cpu support a 32bit-mode,then when does it switch to 64bit-mode to load 64-bit linux? btw,I have an other question,according to ,linux

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Add Calxeda Highbank platform

On 06/21/2011 05:22 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> From: Rob Herring >> >> Add basic support for Calxeda Highbank platform. Only minimal support to boot >> is included. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring >> Cc: Alber

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Add Calxeda Highbank platform

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > Add basic support for Calxeda Highbank platform. Only minimal support to boot > is included. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD > --- >  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/Makefil

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] ARM: highbank: Add AHCI support

From: Rob Herring This enables the AHCI driver on highbank platforms. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Cc: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Albert ARIBAUD --- board/highbank/highbank.c |9 + include/configs/highbank.h | 11 +++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] scsi/ahci: ata id little endian fix

From: Rob Herring The ata id string always needs swapping, not just on BE machines. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Cc: Wolfgang Denk --- drivers/block/ahci.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/ahci.c b/drivers/block/ahci.c index a3ca2dc..d431c5

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] scsi/ahci: add support for non-PCI controllers

From: Rob Herring Add support for AHCI controllers that are not PCI based. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Cc: Wolfgang Denk --- common/cmd_scsi.c|6 +++- drivers/block/ahci.c | 70 +++-- include/ahci.h |4 +++ include/scsi.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Add Calxeda Highbank platform

From: Rob Herring Add basic support for Calxeda Highbank platform. Only minimal support to boot is included. Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Cc: Albert ARIBAUD --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/Makefile | 46 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/config.mk |4 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] arm: add __ilog2 function

From: Rob Herring Add __ilog2 function for ARM. Needed for ahci.c Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Cc: Albert ARIBAUD --- arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h inde

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/5] Add Highbank platform

From: Rob Herring This series enables non-PCI AHCI controllers and adds support for Calxeda Highbank platform which uses the AHCI changes. I've dropped my SDHCI changes as now there are 2 versions of "common SDHCI" code on the list and that needs sorting out. Wolfgang, Albert, Are there any mo

Re: [U-Boot] PCIe Configuration on MPC8544 processor

From: António Silva > > I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 > processor's on a custom board. > One processor is configured as Root Complex > (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and > the other processor as endpoint (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '101'). I've done this with many different conf

Re: [U-Boot] PCIe Configuration on MPC8544 processor

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU < swart...@freescale.com> wrote: > From: António Silva > > > > I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 > > processor's on a custom board. > > One processor is configured as Root Complex > > (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm/master

Hi Wolfgang, The following changes since commit 29b83d983392fcb5378b915ee2112bb48b8c05be: powerpc/p1022ds: set the clock-frequency prop only if the clock is enabled (2011-06-09 15:53:38 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master Aneesh V (6):

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT pull] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx

Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm (2011-06-08 23:29:04 > +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx master > > Timur Tabi (1): > powerpc/p1022ds: set the clock-frequency pro

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Don't do an undefined 32-bit shift on a 32-bit value for a long (4 byte) itest.l command.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 19:10, Joshua Radel wrote: > Without this fix, the following statement erroneously echoed "true" (at least > on the microblaze architecture): > if itest.l 0 == 1; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi > > (using itest.w or itest.b worked as expected even without this chan

[U-Boot] System Administrator

Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, To Re-Validate - > Click Here: System Administrator. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-B

Re: [U-Boot] at91rm9200 linking problem (?)

Dear Marcin Górski, Am 21.06.2011 15:19, schrieb Marcin Górski: >>> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE and >>> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Can this cause this problem? >> >> SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR is required, if you see 'DRAM: ...' output it is likely >> to be a correct value for you. I guess your gd_t parameters

Re: [U-Boot] at91rm9200 linking problem (?)

>> To compile it I also had to add 3 macros to the configuration file: >> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR, > > Why this? I guess you mean CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE here. > Yes, my mistake. >> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE and >> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Can this cause this problem? > > SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR is req

[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3: Include array definition only when it is used

The array of strings corresponding to cpu revision is used only when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected - in the function print_cpuinfo(). Enclose definition of this array in #ifdef...#endif for the same. Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/sys_info.c |3 +++ 1 files c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 02:38 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Aneesh, >> >> In message<4e00447b.9070...@ti.com> you wrote: >>> >>> $ gcc main.c >>> main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant >>> main.c:5: error: (near initialization for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 03:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<4e005f9e.8050...@ti.com> you wrote: >> >> In my function I am using 3 such arrays with quite a few entries in >> them. Won't it look ugly besides increasing the stack footprint. > > I don;t see a significant dif

Re: [U-Boot] SPL framework re-design

Dear Wolfgang, On Friday 17 June 2011 10:18 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > Here is a crude implementation of the top-down approach you had been > suggesting (or my interpretation of it). This is not complete yet and > serves only as a material for further discussions on this topic. Here

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

Dear Aneesh V, In message <4e005f9e.8050...@ti.com> you wrote: > > In my function I am using 3 such arrays with quite a few entries in > them. Won't it look ugly besides increasing the stack footprint. I don;t see a significant difference whether you declare these arrays inside a function or with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh, > > In message<4e00447b.9070...@ti.com> you wrote: >> >> $ gcc main.c >> main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant >> main.c:5: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[0]’) >> main.c:7: error: initializer element is not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

Dear Aneesh, In message <4e00447b.9070...@ti.com> you wrote: > > $ gcc main.c > main.c:5: error: initializer element is not constant > main.c:5: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[0]’) > main.c:7: error: initializer element is not constant > main.c:7: error: (near initialization for ‘arr[1]’)

Re: [U-Boot] da850evm: u-boot does not start without UBL since commit f1d2b313c9eb6808d30c16a9eb5251240452a56c

Hello Christian, Sorry for the late answer ... Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Christian Riesch, > > In message you wrote: >>> What is AIS ? >> I apologize for using that many abbreviations in my mail and not >> explaining them :-/ >> >> AIS is short for Application Image Script [1]. It is a boot s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:55 AM, Aneesh V wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:19 AM, Aneesh V wrote: >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:51 PM, Aneesh V wrote: >> [snip ..] >>> +static const u32 clk_modules_hw_auto_essential[] = { >>> + CM_WKUP_GPIO1_CLKCTRL, >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<4e0030f8.6030...@ti.com> you wrote: >> >> I am finding it difficult to implement this using the struct based >> approach. I tried the sample code below: >> >> struct my_regs_struct { >> const unsigned int

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/22] omap4: add clock support

Dear Aneesh V, In message <4e0030f8.6030...@ti.com> you wrote: > > I am finding it difficult to implement this using the struct based > approach. I tried the sample code below: > > struct my_regs_struct { > const unsigned int reg1; > const unsigned int reg2; > const unsigned in