Re: [U-Boot] Subject

2019-03-18 Thread Eugeniu Rosca
Hi Paul, hello Marek, On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:12:02AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Hi, > > Le lundi 18 mars 2019 à 10:56 +0100, Eugeniu Rosca a écrit : > > Hi Marek, Paul, cc: Alex > > > > jFYI/FWIW, reverting [1-2] allows getting rid of below warnings on > > R-Car3, when running basic f

Re: [U-Boot] Subject

2019-03-18 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/18/19 10:56 AM, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > Hi Marek, Paul, cc: Alex Hi, > jFYI/FWIW, reverting [1-2] allows getting rid of below warnings on > R-Car3, when running basic fastboot commands (e.g. fastboot getvar): Maybe a more constructive approach would be to send a patch fixing the issue instea

Re: [U-Boot] Subject

2019-03-18 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
Hi, Le lundi 18 mars 2019 à 10:56 +0100, Eugeniu Rosca a écrit : > Hi Marek, Paul, cc: Alex > > jFYI/FWIW, reverting [1-2] allows getting rid of below warnings on > R-Car3, when running basic fastboot commands (e.g. fastboot getvar): > > [8.035764] status: -104 ep 'ep1' trans: 0 > [ 18.744

[U-Boot] Subject

2019-03-18 Thread Eugeniu Rosca
Hi Marek, Paul, cc: Alex jFYI/FWIW, reverting [1-2] allows getting rid of below warnings on R-Car3, when running basic fastboot commands (e.g. fastboot getvar): [8.035764] status: -104 ep 'ep1' trans: 0 [ 18.744354] status: -104 ep 'ep1' trans: 28 [ 18.748950] status: -104 ep 'ep1' trans:

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 2/3] TCP and wget implementation. Patch V5, 2 of 3.

2018-01-29 Thread Duncan Hare
This is the TCP and Kconfig files for introducing TCP and wget into u-boot. All the code is new, and not copied from any source. Makefile in the net directory is modified by hand. It appears not to be generated by Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Duncan Hare --- net/Makefile | 3 +- net/tcp.c

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0

2013-04-03 Thread Lubomir Popov
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov --- arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Fix for bug in memory sizing code

2012-09-21 Thread Tom Rini
On 09/21/12 04:15, Gerlando Falauto wrote: Hi, this patch actually breaks the mpc83xx board I am currently working on, leading to a detected size of 2 GiB (as opposed to the actual size of 128 MiB). I tried reviewing it and couldn't really figure out why, as it seems legitimate, and I currently

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Fix for bug in memory sizing code

2012-09-21 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Hi, this patch actually breaks the mpc83xx board I am currently working on, leading to a detected size of 2 GiB (as opposed to the actual size of 128 MiB). I tried reviewing it and couldn't really figure out why, as it seems legitimate, and I currently don't have a chance to check it on other

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Fix for bug in memory sizing code

2012-09-18 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:16:58PM -, Iwo Mergler wrote: > The original memory sizing code in get_ram_size clobbers the word > at the base address, but forgets to restore it. > > Signed-off-by: Iwo Mergler Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signa

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Fix for bug in memory sizing code

2012-09-10 Thread Iwo Mergler
The original memory sizing code in get_ram_size clobbers the word at the base address, but forgets to restore it. Signed-off-by: Iwo Mergler --- common/memsize.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/memsize.c b/common/memsize.c index 963e4f3..74cf075 1

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] libfdt: Add fdt functionality for more intuitive fdt handling

2012-05-08 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:56:54PM +0200, Peter Feuerer wrote: > libfdt: Add fdt functionality for more intuitive fdt handling Hrm, "more intuitive fdt handling" is a bit of a stretch. It makes certain common operations simpler. > New functions: > fdt_read - retrieve the value of a property by f

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] libfdt: Add fdt functionality for more intuitive fdt handling

2012-05-07 Thread Peter Feuerer
libfdt: Add fdt functionality for more intuitive fdt handling New functions: fdt_read - retrieve the value of a property by full path fdt_write - create or change a property with full path and create subnodes if needed fdt_create_path - create subnode path with parents Signed-off-by: Peter Feuer

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: use sdhci.c instead of s5p_mmc.c

2012-03-29 Thread Jaehoon Chung
In driver mmc, generic sdhci code is implemented. s5p_mmc file is dupulicated. we are good that use the generic sdhci. This patch supported the sdhci for Samsung-SoC. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/mmc.h | 93 +++--

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support in uboot **

2011-12-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Uma Shankar, In message <54ed165ef2fa426a95951c4785717...@sisodomain.com> you wrote: > > We at Samsung have implemented ext4 file system support in uboot. Please > review the subsequent patches. Please see http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CodingStyle and http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patch

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support inuboot **

2011-12-12 Thread Graeme Russ
Graeme > > Thanks & Regards, > Uma Shankar > -- > From: "Graeme Russ" > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 4:42 PM > To: > Cc: ; ; > ; ; > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support > inuboot ** >

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support inuboot **

2011-12-12 Thread uma . shankar
y, December 12, 2011 4:42 PM To: Cc: ; ; ; ; Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support inuboot ** Hi Uma, On 12/12/11 21:37, uma.shan...@samsung.com wrote: Hi All, We at Samsung have implemented ext4 file system support in uboot. Please review the subsequent pa

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support in uboot **

2011-12-12 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Uma, On 12/12/11 21:37, uma.shan...@samsung.com wrote: > Hi All, > We at Samsung have implemented ext4 file system support in uboot. Please > review the subsequent patches. > > Thanks & Regards, > Uma Shankar > Manjunatha C Achar > > > From: Uma Shankar > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:01:23 +05

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4fs ls load support

2011-12-12 Thread uma . shankar
From: Uma Shankar Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:01:22 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4fs ls load support Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar , Manjunatha C Achar Signed-off-by: Iqbal Shareef Signed-off-by: Hakgoo Lee --- Makefile |2 +- common/Makefile |1 + common/cmd_ext4.c

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ** Add ext4 filesystem support in uboot **

2011-12-12 Thread uma . shankar
Hi All, We at Samsung have implemented ext4 file system support in uboot. Please review the subsequent patches. Thanks & Regards, Uma Shankar Manjunatha C Achar From: Uma Shankar Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:01:23 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] *** Add ext4 filesystem support in uboot *** *** This

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH v2] Support for sending DHCP client options

2010-10-20 Thread Gray Remlin
If CONFIG_BOOTP_OPTIONS is defined at compile-time, the environment will be checked for the supported DHCPv4 client options during construction of a "DHCP Discover" or "DHCP Request" packet. Any found (as listed below, prefixed with dhcp_) will have their value included in the dhcp packet. dhcp_

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] ppc/83xx Use CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC to enable sdhc clk

2010-04-07 Thread Rini van Zetten
Kumar Gala schreef: > On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Rini van Zetten wrote: > >> Enable eSDHC Clock based on generic CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC define instead of a >> platform define. >> This will enable all the 83xx platforms to use sdhc_clk based on >> CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC. >> It's the same patch as commit 6b

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] ppc/83xx Use CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC to enable sdhc clk

2010-04-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Rini van Zetten wrote: > Enable eSDHC Clock based on generic CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC define instead of a > platform define. > This will enable all the 83xx platforms to use sdhc_clk based on > CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC. > It's the same patch as commit 6b9ea08c5010eab5ad1056bc9bf033a

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] ppc/83xx Use CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC to enable sdhc clk

2010-04-07 Thread Rini van Zetten
Enable eSDHC Clock based on generic CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC define instead of a platform define. This will enable all the 83xx platforms to use sdhc_clk based on CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC. It's the same patch as commit 6b9ea08c5010eab5ad1056bc9bf033afb672d9cc for the ppc/85xx Signed-off-by: Rini --- cpu/mpc

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [U-BOOT] [PATCH] In stmicro_erase() correctly calculate the high byte of the sector address.

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 08:40:41 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > In stmicro_erase() correctly calculate the high byte of the sector address. ive already posted a fix for it; sf: fix stmicro offset setup while erasing see if that works for you -mike signature.asc Description: This is a dig

[U-Boot] Subject: [U-BOOT] [PATCH] In stmicro_erase() correctly calculate the high byte of the sector address.

2009-11-11 Thread Gary Jennejohn
In stmicro_erase() correctly calculate the high byte of the sector address. Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn --- drivers/mtd/spi/stmicro.c |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/stmicro.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/stmicro.c index 9b910c1..b5808c5 10

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH v3] mx27ads: add support for iMX27ADS board from Freescale

2009-09-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Alan Carvalho de Assis, In message <37367b3a0909151429h317066ax2efa504d83dbf...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > This patch adds support to iMX27ADS development board. This board has > 128MB RAM, 32MB NOR Flash and 128MB NAND Flash. Currently only > booting from NOR is supported. > > Signed-off

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH v3] mx27ads: add support for iMX27ADS board from Freescale

2009-09-22 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Fred, Thank you for your fast reply, please see my comments below: On 9/21/09, Fred Fan wrote: > Dear Alan Carvalho de Assis, > > 2009/9/16 Alan Carvalho de Assis > >> + /* >> +* DDR on CSD0 >> +*/ >> + write32 0xD8001010, 0x0008 >> + write32 0x10027828,

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH v3] mx27ads: add support for iMX27ADS board from Freescale

2009-09-21 Thread Fred Fan
Dear Alan Carvalho de Assis, 2009/9/16 Alan Carvalho de Assis > This patch adds support to iMX27ADS development board. This board has > 128MB RAM, 32MB NOR Flash and 128MB NAND Flash. Currently only > booting from NOR is supported. > > Signed-off-by: Alan Carvalho de Assis > --- > MAINTAINERS

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH v3] mx27ads: add support for iMX27ADS board from Freescale

2009-09-15 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
This patch adds support to iMX27ADS development board. This board has 128MB RAM, 32MB NOR Flash and 128MB NAND Flash. Currently only booting from NOR is supported. Signed-off-by: Alan Carvalho de Assis --- MAINTAINERS |3 + MAKEALL

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] kirkwood/gpio.h: remove duplicate definition

2009-08-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:35 Fri 07 Aug , Alessandro Rubini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini > --- > > To test the define is not really needed, I applied the suen3 patch and > added CONFIG_KIRKWOOD_GPIO to the config file. > > Now back to defrag stuff. > > include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h |2

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] kirkwood/gpio.h: remove duplicate definition

2009-08-07 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini --- To test the define is not really needed, I applied the suen3 patch and added CONFIG_KIRKWOOD_GPIO to the config file. Now back to defrag stuff. include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h |2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/in

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed compilation warning in 4xx_enet.c

2009-07-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 02 July 2009 07:22:42 Alessio Centazzo wrote: > This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less > PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation > error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable). > In the original code and in case of

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed compilation warning in 4xx_enet.c

2009-07-01 Thread Alessio Centazzo
This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable). In the original code and in case of 440SPE platforms, 'ethgroup' is initialized to -1 and never modifi

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] [repost] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

2009-05-26 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 584b5fbd4abfc43f920cc1c329633e03816e28be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter. Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun --- drivers/net/mcfmii.c |2 +- 1

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

2009-05-25 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Richard, Richard Retanubun wrote: > From 584b5fbd4abfc43f920cc1c329633e03816e28be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Richard Retanubun > Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:01 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop > counter. > > > Signed-off-by: Richard

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

2009-05-20 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 584b5fbd4abfc43f920cc1c329633e03816e28be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter. Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun --- Hi TC, Sorry for the long delay, I g

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH 06/11 v1] ARM: OMAP3: Add memory and syslib common files, add NAND support

2008-09-14 Thread dirk . behme
t = 600; google_ad_format = "160x600_as"; google_ad_channel = "8427791634"; google_color_border = "FF"; google_color_bg = "FF"; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> [U-Boot]

Re: [U-Boot] Subject line tag differences "U-Boot-Users vs. U-Boot" between the two U-Boot mailing list servers

2008-08-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ken, I wrote: > > configured such that the server must send all mailing list > > messages to me despite my address already being in a To or CC > > header. However, the old server didn't do this and neither > > does the new server. > > Are you absolutely sure that the list server is doing t

Re: [U-Boot] Subject line tag differences "U-Boot-Users vs. U-Boot" between the two U-Boot mailing list servers

2008-08-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > A mailing list server typically only archives messages that it > actually serves, so a separate archiving server subscribed to Typically. Assume that the mailing list archive on list.denx.de will include the old archives from S

Re: [U-Boot] Subject line tag differences "U-Boot-Users vs. U-Boot" between the two U-Boot mailing list servers

2008-08-11 Thread Ken.Fuchs
> Ken Fuchs wrote: > > Messages with just [U-Boot-Users] in the subject line implies it > > was handled by [EMAIL PROTECTED] If this is > > the case, let the SF server handle the thread to completion! Wolfgang Denk wrote: > This is not necessary. Threading should continue to work even when >

Re: [U-Boot] Subject line tag differences "U-Boot-Users vs. U-Boot" between the two U-Boot mailing list servers

2008-08-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Subject line tags in the transition to the new mailing list server: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] generates [U-Boot-Users]. > u-boot@lists.denx.de generates a [U-Boot]. That's intentional, as the new list's name is "u-boot" (and n

Re: [U-Boot] Subject line tag differences "U-Boot-Users vs. U-Boot" between the two U-Boot mailing list servers

2008-08-08 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:20:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Messages with just [U-Boot-Users] in the subject line implies it > was handled by [EMAIL PROTECTED] If this is > the case, let the SF server handle the thread to completion! > This is an implication of the sentence "Please post

[U-Boot] Subject line tag differences "U-Boot-Users vs. U-Boot" between the two U-Boot mailing list servers

2008-08-08 Thread Ken.Fuchs
Subject line tags in the transition to the new mailing list server: [EMAIL PROTECTED] generates [U-Boot-Users]. u-boot@lists.denx.de generates a [U-Boot]. Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello everybody, > > after the automatic notice you should have received telling you that > you have been subscribed