RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-19 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
o Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:07 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: > Tony, > How long is "a long time now"? I have quite a bit of history with the > product and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Bill Haskett
DataTrust pooled pts/2 udcs 22:42:15 Jul 18 2007 3 3092 197615 wphaskett udt pts/3 192.168.1.101 22:42:30 Jul 18 2007 Bill >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno >Sent: Wednesday, July 18,

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Gravagno
LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: > Tony, > How long is "a long time now"? I have quite a bit of history with the > product and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3 > (and I haven't time to confirm if it is v3), which is a fairly new > version. Long time = over a year now. Current release is

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
D] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:46 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported in a near-f

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Bill Haskett
ED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:53 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO > >I am sure it is useful for many things. > > BTW - UO.NET is only a 208kb download, you don't need the > whole clients

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Symeon Breen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:11 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO > >mv.NET can also connect back to the host via telnet - which always makes me &g

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Bill Haskett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:11 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO > >mv.NET can also connect back to the host via telnet - which always makes me >grin, but I am sure it has its uses

Re: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Don Kibbey
The current system I work on (not U2 based) uses a vb6 front end that communicates via custom tcp/ip libraries to a backend component running on a windows server within the MKS (unix) environment calling into informix 4gl code that has been compiled against a translation library to work with sql s

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Symeon Breen
: mv.NET and UO Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported in a near-future release. It's preferable to use managed components all the way through, so UO.NET is the preferred pipe. T

[U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Gravagno
Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported in a near-future release. It's preferable to use managed components all the way through, so UO.NET is the preferred pipe. T LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: >