"features":
>> > > > 1. I tried to change the menus and menubaritems that they look like
>> > one
>> > > > single widget (We discussed that before...). It works now.
>> > > > 2. I wanted to be as close as possible to Ken's Union-stuff.
Right said.
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> I have really tried to keep this short.
>
>
> The Problem:
>
> I have been a bit distressed about some of the latest activity on this
> list. A lot of people seem to be posting ideas about new features they
> want implemented in the desktop. In sho
y should reflect a
> step in that direction. Probably a very small step but at this point in time
> having a long term plan and just beginning to realize it would be a huge step
> for Ubuntu artwork.
>
> On Tuesday 29 January 2008 23:04:52 Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
>> I don'
t;> for Murrine on Cimi website screenshots is a bit scary regarding it's
>> usability - a little bit fat font could be a better solution on small
>> UI widgets.
>>
>> --
>> Nemes Ioan Sorin
>>
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
You have right here, Compiz offer a lot of really useful extensions
(aside 3D cube - like Zoom, Opacify, Group and Tab Windows ...etc)
unfortunately there are several drawbacks on implementation of AIGLX
with proprietary drivers - even they offer support on the hardware side
- this collaboratio
guments please.
You can do it in a personal manner - not posting your response for
entire list, You choose. I am a reasonable people and If you have right
arguments - my respect for that.
I'll stay tuned.
Cory K. wrote:
> Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
>> This kind of answer should n
t; Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
>> You should try Aurora engine and Aurora Themes
>
> This was the engine that had no reason to exist right? The one forked
> from Murrine and could be done within Murrine?
>
> -Cory
>
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
You should try Aurora engine and Aurora Themes before (v1.3 AND 1.4)
some of them here (please check links from the page)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=566881&page=2
(Aurora Borealis is a good example).
A .deb with the new Aurora Engine (v.1.4)
http://www.costmoon.ro/aurora/gtk2-engin
>> 1 - The client.
> Mark Shuttleworth.
I'm not so sure is Mark itself agree with this position - He wants to
give something to others not to itself. I'm afraid that Ubuntu is right
now a public person and a common value for some millions of human
entities. Being open source I'm in doubt if
Well, Troy this can be a start. To create a responsible team to keep a
rhythm, to have some public places, a team which can start writing
specifications and guidelines for what can be a great thing.
-> about the default theme - this community move around the Earth
because a new brand look is r
I personally take this Civitas Forum in a semi-serious mode.
Why ?
I put here on this community some questions - in time - and I add some
points in discussion.
Responses, generally - just disappoint me. Where I talk about serious
problems such a programmatic way to rethink UI elements design -
uthor to design for Ubuntu Artwork a theme
based on Aurora if we desperately need something "of our own". This is a
nice concept and metaphor and is almost perfect. The author is an
experienced designer and programmer hhttp://www.nanolx.org/
Wait for a response from the community side about
julian wrote:
> ..on Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 10:25:18PM +0100, sylvain marc wrote:
>> Good theme
>
> this is a clean and eye-pleasing direction.
>
> comments:
>
> i think the shading on the buttons is a bit too much, perhaps
> so much so that it's hard to differentiate between a button-pressed
Matthew you have right,
Good models are gears of the progress. Comparison is the mother of the
progress.
Those discussions should not take consideration for not funded opinions.
I think this is good because " ... " / this is not ok because " ... ".
Else ...words in the wind. Significant facts a
Totally agree,
communication is ...perfectible - need to get a better interaction.
nothlit wrote:
> I suggest, that part of item two:
>
> 2) the process for contributions and a more accessible method to contribute
>
> A Gallery system should be implemented (technical resources allowing)
> for
ok - no problem from my side.
do what you have to do ;)
I was too busy to be active last months - hope to have time this fall.
Sorin
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have over 2,500 emails waiting in the queue. 99.9% of them are spam. I
> am sorting through things, discarding most e
Dont know - here is smaller than yours (1152 x 856 resolution)
Martijn Bastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
> Why are the emblems (in dutch: Emblemen) so small? Please see the
> attachment.
>
>
>
>
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-ar
DA COSTA
U have a good ideea
From the ground to the sky
Gutsy must do this change to point on a larger, generous ideea
Good Work
> On Monday 30 July 2007 09:40:56 Filipe DA COSTA wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here you have my first idea for a wallpaper:
>>
>> http://www.play.lu/host/test_01_002.jpg
>>
>
Man,
we need to start with the philosophy behind -> ;)
Ok, back to problem
First - we need to chose OR to make a set of default themes.
Not every new user is a geek - mostly - work with what they got
without any change.
Second - this community must work hand in hand with core programmers
because
19 matches
Mail list logo
