On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Salane Ashcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:08 PM, coz DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
We need to be
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexi Helligar wrote:
Don't know about the top-posting business. I use Gmail and I just
reply to messages I receive.
Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list.
[snip]
Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list.
[snip]
-Cory K.
Sorry! Did not mean to make your life more difficult through my
ignorance of well established etiquette. Will try to do better.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Salane Ashcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list.
http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists/etiquette#head-c70bc55ce24849bd82885e8b0f7e972465944b5a
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place.
Nothing stifles creativity and enthusiasm more than getting hit with a
laundry list of rules and regulations you must comply with (well,
except maybe getting caught up in
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place.
Nothing stifles creativity and enthusiasm more than getting hit with a
laundry list of rules
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:08 PM, coz DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place.
Nothing stifles creativity
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:08 PM, coz DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place.
Nothing stifles creativity
On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Ken Vermette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:08 PM, coz DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
We need to be careful to
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:40 PM, shadowh511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, shadowh511 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we care about top posting again?
For consistency.
For
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexi Helligar wrote:
Don't know about the top-posting business. I use Gmail and I just
reply to messages I receive.
Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting
I'm getting a bit tired of this eternal Top Posting rant. In the
future mail, please perceived offenders off-list.
+1
I know I'm just a lurker who has very little to offer, but frankly, this
constant complaint is off putting. I totally
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Dean Landolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting
I'm getting a bit tired of this eternal Top Posting rant. In the
future mail, please perceived offenders off-list.
+1
I know I'm just a lurker who has very little
Well, top posting is quite annoying when you're trying to view the thread
linearly. Imagine if on a forum someone kept finding a way of posting before
the original author way back on page one.
Anyway, in Gmail it's pretty easy to avoid. When you do a replay just page
down to after the person
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Dean Landolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, top posting is quite annoying when you're trying to view the thread
linearly. Imagine if on a forum someone kept finding a way of posting before
the original author way back on page one.
Anyway, in Gmail it's pretty
I think it's because Ubuntu artwork made it on Digg again, and a lot of
people joined the list who aren't familiar with them at all.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Vadim Peretokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's because Ubuntu artwork made it on Digg again, and a lot of
people joined the list who aren't familiar with them at all.
Which means etiquette really isn't as commonly accepted as a select
anachronistic few
Justin Dugger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Vadim Peretokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's because Ubuntu artwork made it on Digg again, and a lot of
people joined the list who aren't familiar with them at all.
Which means etiquette really isn't as commonly accepted
18 matches
Mail list logo