On 21 June 2012 12:23, John Arbash Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
...
We haven't had any movement on this for a few days.
To sum up, this is my understanding of the situation. 1. We need to
switch our udd to postgres 2. We need to make
James Westby james.wes...@canonical.com writes:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:35:44 +0200, John Arbash Meinel
j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
As I understand it, James still needs to do some work to get Storm to
not require as strict of an isolation level. For me personally, I'd
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:22:22 +0200, Vincent Ladeuil vila+...@canonical.com
wrote:
Rollback is to revert the storm code again
Restore the dbs.
I don't think we should do that if we have no evidence of data
corruption. We'd be repeating work for no benefit.
Rollback is to stop the
[2012-06-21 18:17:03] lb_clean --purge
[1;37mP[0m: Executing auto/clean script.
[2012-06-21 18:17:03] lb_clean noauto --purge
[1;37mP[0m: Executing auto/clean script.
[2012-06-21 18:17:03] lb_clean noauto --all
P: Cleaning chroot
[1;37mP[0m: Executing auto/clean script.
[2012-06-21 18:17:09]
[2012-06-21 18:17:04] lb_clean --purge
[1;37mP[0m: Executing auto/clean script.
[2012-06-21 18:17:04] lb_clean noauto --purge
[1;37mP[0m: Executing auto/clean script.
[2012-06-21 18:17:04] lb_clean noauto --all
P: Cleaning chroot
[1;37mP[0m: Executing auto/clean script.
[2012-06-21 18:17:13]
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 09:13:17 PM Jono Bacon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
For our current Ubuntu ISOs. Flavors currently are coordinating their
own
Thought I would chime in with my thoughts on freezes, snapshot testing,
and QA in general.
Freezes:
When I was testing the Arm images, there were times when I would go for
weeks without an image. And if I remember correctly, there was a period
during Natty where there were no images between
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 10:11 +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
This cycle, the next step for Unity and all related components is that
each release is potentially the last one that is uploaded to ubuntu
until the finale release. So, each version is a possible release
candidate for Quantal. I do not
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:14:05 PM Jono Bacon wrote:
My goal in this cycle is to ensure we have a regular testing cadence
for Ubuntu and not based on milestones; if the Kubuntu team want to
have your own internal milestones for targeting work and testing, I
see no reason why you can't do
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michael Casadevall
mcasadev...@ubuntu.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2012 11:14 PM, Jono Bacon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Scott Kitterman
ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 09:13:17 PM Jono
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Michael Casadevall
mcasadev...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If we had more resources we would love to provide help for the
flavors, and we are certainly happy to offer any guidance and
advice, with with our current resources and staffing, Nick
doesn't have the bandwidth
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Jono Bacon j...@ubuntu.com
The Kubuntu team are welcome to determine whatever milestones they
want - no one is suggesting anything needs to change for the flavors
in their testing cadence. I am purely stating how Nick will be
working: the only output of this
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Rick Spencer
rick.spen...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Jono Bacon j...@ubuntu.com
The Kubuntu team are welcome to determine whatever milestones they
want - no one is suggesting anything needs to change for the flavors
in their testing
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 06:52:58 PM Rick Spencer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Jono Bacon j...@ubuntu.com
The Kubuntu team are welcome to determine whatever milestones they
want - no one is suggesting anything needs to change for the flavors
in their testing cadence. I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2012 09:43 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Michael Casadevall
mcasadev...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If we had more resources we would love to provide help for
the flavors, and we are certainly happy to offer any
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:14:05 PM Jono Bacon wrote:
Well to be clear, Nick is one member of the Ubuntu community who is
focused on testing. Other people are welcome to coordinate testing
campaigns and get others interested and excited about testing, but
Nick's focus is explicitly on the
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:09:54 AM Michael Casadevall wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2012 09:43 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Michael Casadevall
mcasadev...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If we had more resources we would love to provide
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
I don't think it is unreasonable for Canonical to focus its resources
on Ubuntu as opposed to the flavors.
I'm crystal clear that the Canonical community team's QA effort is focused on
trying to get the broader
So we've clearly heard the opinion of Kubuntu...are there any other
derivatives who wish to contribute to this discussion. I for one, would
be interested in knowing/hearing how these suggested changes impact them.
-Robbie
--
Robbie Williamson rob...@ubuntu.com
robbiew[irc.freenode.net]
Don't
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 01:34:18 PM Robbie Williamson wrote:
So we've clearly heard the opinion of Kubuntu...are there any other
derivatives who wish to contribute to this discussion. I for one, would
be interested in knowing/hearing how these suggested changes impact them.
FWIW, while I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It has come to my attention that my emails in this thread have sounded
somewhat accusatory towards both members of Canonical and Ubuntu.
This was not my intent, and I apologize the way I may have came
across, and hope that any party who was offended
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
a.star...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Michael Casadevall
mcasadev...@ubuntu.com wrote:
It has come to my attention that my emails in this thread have sounded
somewhat accusatory towards both members of Canonical
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 03:27:01 PM Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
If I may speak for myself here, my goal is to encourage ubuntu as a
project to be a leader in open source in the realm of quality. It's what
I care about and I hope to be a part of making happen. My work at
Canonical aligns with
On 06/21/2012 02:14 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:12:06 PM Michael Casadevall wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It has come to my attention that my emails in this thread have sounded
somewhat accusatory towards both members of Canonical and
On 06/21/2012 03:34 PM, Robbie Williamson wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:00 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:34 PM, Robbie Williamson wrote:
So we've clearly heard the opinion of Kubuntu...are there any other
derivatives who wish to contribute to this discussion. I for one, would
be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2012 02:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
Starting with just a bit of nitpicking but it's something
we agreed at UDS that we'd try to get fixed in everyone's
mind :) We're flavours not derivatives, flavours are
fully integrated in the Ubuntu
Hi Stéphane
On 21/06/2012 15:45, Stéphane Graber wrote:
You'll notice that the flavours are listed separately under a flavours
heading on that page, and what's listed afterwards are proper
derivatives as in, out of the archive, custom spin based on Ubuntu.
It did say that flavours are
On 06/21/2012 02:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:25:09 AM Jono Bacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
I don't think it is unreasonable for Canonical to focus its resources
on Ubuntu as opposed to the flavors.
I'm
I've become disdained with Linux's pet filesystems as of late. This
is for a few very simple reasons:
- ext4 is attempting to be XFS
- btrfs is trying to be ZFS
Let's shoot down btrfs first, because it'll be easier.
btrfs is an enterprise-scale management system similar to LLVM +
29 matches
Mail list logo
