Last week I did my +1 maintenance shift. I got sick on Wednesday and
had to take Thursday and Friday off, which impacted the amount of work I
was able to do.
* pytorch
- Athos had already done an initial investigation and left his
findings on
On Monday, April 15 2024, Robie Basak wrote:
> Reason to keep it dpaste.com:
>
> People have complained that the login requirement makes it unusable for
> helping Ubuntu users at large who don't necessarily have an Ubuntu SSO
> account.
The requirement for login is really a pain. I find myself
On Tuesday, February 27 2024, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:31:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> * celery
>> - Spent a long time investigating the Python 3.12 segfault that
>> happens when running dh_auto_test. I was able to obtain a usa
This week I did my +1 maintenance shift. I was swamped with other
unrelated, high priority work so it was a bit tricky to juggle
everything.
I like to start from the bottom of update_excuses and choose some of the
more challenging FTBFSes. schopin also pinged me about some FTBFSes
that were
On Friday, September 01 2023, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> * **gsl**: Retried failing ruby-gsl/2.1.0.3+dfsg1-5build2 on ppc64el.
> It is still failing and needs to be investigated.
I did a little investigative work and found that the problem can be
workarounded by compiling with -O2 instead of -O3.
On Tuesday, August 01 2023, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 13:30, Sergio Durigan Junior
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a heads up that the QEMU package on Mantic is currently affected by
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/2
Hi,
Just a heads up that the QEMU package on Mantic is currently affected by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/2016252. This about
using QEMU in a nested VM environment, and as such is impacting dep8
tests that make use of such feature (systemd tests come to mind, but
there are
On Thursday, July 27 2023, Tim Andersson wrote:
> In the Ubuntu QA team we recently made and deployed a change which now
> makes it impossible to queue duplicate requests.
[...]
Thank you very much, Tim. This is a much appreciated feature.
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F
This week I did my +1 maintenance shift. As usual, I got a bit
sidetracked on Monday due to other pressing matters.
I like to start from the bottom of update -excuses and choose some of the
more challenging FTBFSes. Here's my report:
Investigations
==
* wtforms -alchemy
-
On Thursday, February 16 2023, I wrote:
> On Monday, February 13 2023, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:58:56PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> * gatb-core
>>> - Debian dropped s390x from the list of supported architectures.
>>&
On Thursday, February 16 2023, Brian Murray wrote:
> First off I want to apologize for not sending this earlier. The Ubuntu
> QA team was focused on restoring the service but could have been more
> communicative regarding what was going on.
>
> In brief there was an outage with some underlying
On Monday, February 13 2023, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:58:56PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> * gatb-core
>> - Debian dropped s390x from the list of supported architectures.
>> - Pinged ubuntu-archive and asked them to ref
This week I did my +1 maintenance shift. I got sidetracked a few times
due to some urgent requests/tasks. Also, due to the size of
autopkgtests.u.c's queue I decided to focus on old FTBFSes.
Investigations
==
* pspp
- In -proposed for 219 days.
- armhf is FTBFSing due to a
On Thursday, December 15 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:15:21PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Monday, November 21 2022, I wrote:
>
>> > On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Nov 21
On Monday, November 21 2022, I wrote:
> On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>
>>> This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have
&g
On Thursday, December 08 2022, Ben Bridges wrote:
> Hi Robie (and Marc),
>
> I've never reported a bug to Ubuntu before. I ran ubuntu-bug against
> the crash report and told it to send the report. It appears to have
> uploaded it to the Ubuntu error tracker
>
On Friday, December 09 2022, Ben Bridges wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> I appreciate the information. Are you sure, though, that the bug(s)
> you referenced are the applicable bugs in my case? The bugs you
> referenced appear to be problems with dig in 9.18 on jammy. In my
> case, it was named itself
On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
Hi Steve,
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have
>> just uploaded th
Hello,
This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have
just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing
no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon.
The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition
can be obtained by running:
On Friday, October 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
Hello,
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:47:09PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> * cryfs
>> - FTBFS on ppc64el due to RLIMIT_MEMLOCK being too low.
>> - After spending some time playing with set
Investigations
==
* spaln
- Upstream (and therefore Debian) dropped support for 32-bit
architectures, so the armhf binary had to be removed.
- On top of that, there as an FTBFS happening on riscv64 due to LTO.
"Fixed" in Debian (with the proper "LP:..." mark). The fix
On Thursday, September 15 2022, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Hurray!
>
> Awesome to see this arrive, even if it's slightly after I left Canonical xD
>
> Thanks for the hard work setting this up for Ubuntu (and Debian)!
Thanks, Dan! And thanks for the support and encouragement while you
were still
[ Sending to ubuntu-devel as well. ]
Hello,
I would like to announce a new service for the Ubuntu community: an
instance of debuginfod, running at https://debuginfod.ubuntu.com.
Debuginfod is a project whose purpose is to serve ELF/DWARF/source-code
information over HTTP(S). In a nutshell, by
Hello,
I would like to announce a new service for the Ubuntu community: an
instance of debuginfod, running at https://debuginfod.ubuntu.com.
Debuginfod is a project whose purpose is to serve ELF/DWARF/source-code
information over HTTP(S). In a nutshell, by using a debuginfod service
you will
On Friday, July 22 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
Hello,
Sorry for the delay. I was travelling and then on medical leave.
> I notice in this report that most of the items you worked on requiring
> source changes have Debian bugs or MPs as references, but there is no
> mention of
On Wednesday, July 13 2022, I wrote:
> * sbcl
> - As Athos mentioned
> (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-July/042200.html),
> we're starting to work on bootstrapping sbcl on ppc64el.
> - Unfortunately we've hit some bumps... The build is mysteriously
>
I've been on +1 maintenance shift from Monday to Wednesday. I'm also
working on my DebConf presentation & debuginfod in parallel.
Retriggers that worked
==
sqlite> SELECT DISTINCT test.package, result.version, result.triggers
sqlite> FROM result INNER JOIN test ON test.id =
On Monday, June 06 2022, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:18 PM Sergio Durigan Junior
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, June 02 2022, Dan Streetman wrote:
>>
>> > How do I get access to bileto? Everyone in canonical product engineering
>> > s
On Thursday, May 05 2022, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> this came up again in a review, and I wanted to ask a broader audience.
>
> How to we send LTO[1] related delta to Debian, given that Debian isn't
> using LTO (yet)?
TBH I think it depends on the Debian maintainer. I myself will gladly
accept
On Friday, April 29 2022, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> Hi Sergio, thanks for the reply
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:14 PM Sergio Durigan Junior
> wrote:
>> Either way, I believe this issue should be addressed in krb5 as I said
>> above. I haven't been able to find any bug
On Friday, April 29 2022, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I disabled lto in a build according to the instructions from [1]:
>
> export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=optimize=-lto
>
> But I saw that it was still present in some steps of the build.
> Notably when krb5/gssapi was used:
> ...
> -- Found
On Friday, January 14 2022, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 23:11, Sergio Durigan Junior
> wrote:
>> While at it, there's this annoying bug that happens when the packageset
>> and the team names are the same; in this case, the internal links will
>> point t
On Thursday, January 13 2022, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> thanks for that work!
Seconded.
> I've found two details I wanted to ask about ...
While at it, there's this annoying bug that happens when the packageset
and the team names are the same; in this case, the internal links will
point to
I've been on +1 maintenance part of this week (from Tuesday to Friday).
Unfortunately, due to a combination of meetings + other work priorities
+ some personal stuff I wasn't able to dedicate as much time as I
initially planned.
Retriggers that worked
==
sqlite> SELECT
On Wednesday, November 17 2021, Simon Chopin wrote:
> Hi all,
Hey Simon,
Thanks for your work on this, BTW. Much appreciated :-).
> You might have noticed that the OpenSSL 3 transition was supposed to get
> started a couple of weeks ago. As usual with these things, it slipped
> away as there
On Wednesday, October 13 2021, Robie Basak wrote:
> git-ubuntu is now able to accept rich history directly from any uploader.
>
> The CLI is in beta and subject to change. Feedback appreciated!
[...]
> # Caveats
>
> * Note that error paths are not currently well handled. I intend to fix
>
This week has been my +1 maintenance shift. I had some interruptions
here and there during the week, but here's what I did:
* Retriggers
I didn't do many retriggers over the week; I preferred to focus on
investigating and solving bugs. Here are the successful retriggers I
did (there are a few
This week was my +1 maintenance shift, and I was shadowed by Athos (who
will send a separate report).
Here's what I did.
* Retriggers
I did a lot of retriggers over the week, including one for libreoffice
that was repeated (sorry). The list below contains all of the
retriggers that passed, and
On Thursday, May 20 2021, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> Great!
>
> Please take this opportunity of a soname change to drop some of our old
> delta ;)
Absolutely will do! Thanks :-).
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Hi folks,
I have been working on getting OpenLDAP 2.5 ready to start the
transition process in impish. Ryan Tandy (Debian's OpenLDAP maintainer)
has been very, very kind and helping me drive this process forward.
I am currently working on solving the remaining FTBFSes (from packages
that link
Hi,
This week was my +1 maintenance rotation. I got distracted by other
things that showed up along the way, but overall I managed to do a lof
of retriggers and investigate a few bugs here and there.
Retriggers that succeeded
=
devscripts [hirsute/amd64]
2.20.5ubuntu6
On Friday, January 22 2021, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Together with Timo I was debugging this issue a little further, and we were
> able to pinpoint the faulty commit, introducing the regression:
> https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/commit/2ccd0bed4e60e44303d5f1cf96bd30572ffea85b
>
> We
On Friday, January 22 2021, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:25:02PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 21 2021, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>
>> > On 21.1.2021 18.59, Lukas Märdian wrote:
>> >> NO - dogtag-pki vs ['389-ds-ba
On Thursday, January 21 2021, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 21.1.2021 18.59, Lukas Märdian wrote:
>> NO - dogtag-pki vs ['389-ds-base/1.4.4.9-1build2',
>> 'net-snmp/5.9+dfsg-3ubuntu1']
>>
>> So I had a closer look into the dogtag-pki failure on s390x. I could
>> easily reproduce the problem inside a
Hi,
This was my first week working in the +1 maintenance effort. Here are
(most?) of the things I did:
Retriggers that succeeded
=
$ sqlite3 autopkgtest.db "SELECT DISTINCT test.package, result.version FROM
result INNER JOIN test ON test.id = result.test_id WHERE
Hi,
I spent Wednesday and Thursday doing +1 maintenance this week. Lucas
Kanashiro did the test retriggers for me (thanks!). Also, most of the
work below was done aiming at getting php7.4 migrated. Spoiler alert:
in the end, it wasn't possible to do that because of libffi.
-
On Friday, August 14 2020, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> 2. groovy rsync was one of the many packages waiting for
>armhf test backlog to resolve - it just needed some help with test
> triggers
>and then migrated.
Hm, I still see rsync blocked (or maybe you were referring to a previous
On Saturday, July 18 2020, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 19:09, Nicholas Guriev wrote:
>>
>> Dear Ubuntu developers,
>>
>> GNU coreutils 8.32 have been released on March 6th, 2020, yet the
>> package is not updated in groovy. The new version has enhanced support
>> of file
On Friday, July 17 2020, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> This was my week and here is some of my notes about achievements and
> highlights:
I helped Rafael a little bit on Tuesday and Wednesday. Here's my brief
report.
>
> Overall status:
> --
>
> - read all the maint+1 docs and @piloted in
On Friday, May 29 2020, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:31:56AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Friday, May 29 2020, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>> > I've drafted a POC implementation for df here:
>> >
>> >
>> > https:
On Friday, May 29 2020, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> These days, df displays a lot of mount points, due to the increased use
> of non-consumable filesystems such as tmpfs and squashfs. This clutter
> is particularly noticeable using df in Ubuntu, due to the increased
> popularity of snaps, but the
51 matches
Mail list logo
