On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:59:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:11:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > I think we need to train our britney to block on Debian or Ubuntu RC
> > bugs. Maybe this will also allow the Kubuntu developers to package the
> > KDE beta updates wi
On 02/28/2013 11:03 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Micah Gersten [2013-02-28 13:33 -0600]:
>> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
>> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed.
> Not on RC bugs, but we can still block them manually. Pinging any
> release team memb
Micah Gersten [2013-02-28 13:33 -0600]:
> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed.
Not on RC bugs, but we can still block them manually. Pinging any
release team member about that works right now.
What appears to be
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 01:38:28 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:16:57PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> I do think that while 75% of the archive is imported unmodified from
> >> Debian, the vast majority of these packages are in the long tail that
> >> both a) don't
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:16:57PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I do think that while 75% of the archive is imported unmodified from
>> Debian, the vast majority of these packages are in the long tail that
>> both a) don't individually have many users in Ubuntu, and b) don't have
>> anyone payi
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:59:19 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:11:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten wrote:
> > > Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
> > > built packages or block based on
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 03:11:27 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten wrote:
> > Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
> > built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
> > point at some time in the f
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:11:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten wrote:
> > Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
> > built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
> > point at some time in the fu
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 06:17:17 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 17:05, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
> >> Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are
> >> stable
> >> and useful before they
Hey,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:15:28PM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> […]
> > Maybe this will also allow the Kubuntu developers to package the
> > KDE beta updates without needing to worry about those getting picked
> > up in the next (monthly?) updat
On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
>> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
>> point at some time in the future of being more st
On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten wrote:
> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
> point at some time in the future of being more stable than testing in a
> rolling release, but I d
Hi Scott,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:23:14PM -0500, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> wrote:
> > But just like debian we know have britney, together with many
> > automatic adt tests which we run on all reverse dependencies in
> > jenkins. Uploading beta ve
On 02/28/2013 12:17 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 17:05, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
>>> Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are stable
>>> and useful before they upload, and our processes
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> But just like debian we know have britney, together with many
> automatic adt tests which we run on all reverse dependencies in
> jenkins. Uploading beta version of software into sid has never been
> welcomed and by default it gets release
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:17:17PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
[emphasis mine]
> But just like debian we know have britney, together with many
> automatic adt tests which we run on all reverse dependencies in
> jenkins. Uploading beta version of software into sid has never been
> welcomed and by
On 28 February 2013 17:05, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
>> Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are stable
>> and useful before they upload, and our processes protect us from most
>> mistakes these days. The resu
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
> Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are stable
> and useful before they upload, and our processes protect us from most
> mistakes these days. The result is that 13.04 has been as robust a release
> over the
18 matches
Mail list logo
