-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HSO wrote on 08/02/12 09:02:
>
> 2012/2/7, Jordon Bedwell :
>>
>> Stop throwing around privacy like there is some big security flaw
>> in Linux, there are tools that do what everyone wants, it seems
>> to me that nobody is willing to even look or eve
>
> Stop throwing around privacy like there is some big security flaw in
> Linux, there are tools that do what everyone wants, it seems to me
> that nobody is willing to even look or everybody is fed baby food,
> what is the point of being on Linux if you aren't going to use the
> terminal for what
cause such an app allows them to solve these problems when using Mac
& Windows. If Ubuntu doesn't want an application firewall, create something
else to solve the problem (e.g., with a GUI wrapper for apparmor & IPtables).
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:04:58 +0100
> Subje
An application that merges apparmor and iptables (as a wrapper) would be
fantastic! add a GUI to it that helps newbies use it and problem solved.
Perhaps Canonical could create such an application as part of their ongoing
work with apparmor?
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jason Todd wrote
All you talk about it's planed - some of programed some of in progress.
Look at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Networking
2012/2/7, Jordon Bedwell :
> Stop throwing around privacy like there is some big security flaw in
> Linux, there are tools that do what everyone wants, it seems to me
> that nobody i
Stop throwing around privacy like there is some big security flaw in
Linux, there are tools that do what everyone wants, it seems to me
that nobody is willing to even look or everybody is fed baby food,
what is the point of being on Linux if you aren't going to use the
terminal for what it's there
System and installed-Programs' internet connection
behavior is an important privacy feature.
> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:32:10 +
> From: m...@canonical.com
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in
2012/1/30, HSO :
> Firewall "in to" Network Manager &
> NetHogs allgo. form source code "in to" System Monitor, code
>
> For me - Cool :-)
>
> Firewall - iptables + Some of part of code fwbuilder can be use ?
>
>
>
> --
>
> "powiedz mi, a zapomnę, pokaż -- a zapamiętam, pozwól mi działać, a
> zroz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robbie Williamson wrote on 29/01/12 21:39:
>
> On 01/26/2012 11:12 PM, nick rundy wrote: ...
>>
>> Just to be clear, I'm not asking that an application-firewall
>> (as Jason Todd was speaking of) be created to solve this problem.
>> I'm totally fine
of their
> applications & system.
>
>
> Thank you so much for reading/listening to my concerns on this issue. I
> hope I have been clear in my descriptions :-)
>
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:30:52 -0600
>> From: rob...@ubuntu.com
>> To: jtodd
pe I
have been clear in my descriptions :-)
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:30:52 -0600
> From: rob...@ubuntu.com
> To: jtodd...@hotmail.com
> CC: nru...@hotmail.com; ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name i
lication firewall.
>
> ----------------------------
> From: nru...@hotmail.com
> To: ps...@ubuntu.com; ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: RE: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in
> log files)?
>
only for programmers and everyone that uses Ubuntu thinks he's stupid cause he
wanted an application firewall.
From: nru...@hotmail.com
To: ps...@ubuntu.com; ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: RE: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log
files)?
Date:
really appreciate your suggestion.
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:55:18 -0500
> From: ps...@ubuntu.com
> To: nru...@hotmail.com
> CC: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log
> files)?
>
> -BEGIN PGP
14 matches
Mail list logo
