2.3.0-1ubuntu12.4.1-1
> Andreas Hasenack
I synced this yesterday, and it migrated already.
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:55 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:54 PM Lucas Kanashiro
> wrote:
> >
> > # Bug triage
> >
> > ## https://pad.lv/2058942 || D | New | mysql-8.0
>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:54 PM Lucas Kanashiro
wrote:
>
> # Bug triage
>
> ## https://pad.lv/2058942 || D | New | mysql-8.0
> | package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 failed to … |
>
> Marked as Incomplete. Asked for more information.
>
> ##
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:48 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
>
> New Mergeable Version in Debian Unstable
> --
> high multipath-tools 0.9.7-4 0.9.4-5ubuntu3
> high samba
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 5:47 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
> gnokii 0.6.31+dfsg-2ubuntu10 0.6.31+dfsg-5
> Andreas Hasenack
gnokii 0.6.31+dfsg-5ubuntu1 was published in noble/universe on
2024-02-07 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnokii/0.6.3
> Lucas Kanashiro
> django-cte 1.3.0-1ubuntu11.3.2-1
> Lena Voytek
> django-oauth-toolkit1.7.0-2ubuntu12.3.0-3
> Lena Voytek
> elinks 0.16.1.1-4ubuntu1 0.16.1.1-4.1
Thanks for your help and for being our colleague, Michał!
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:29 AM Michał Małoszewski <
michal.maloszew...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Today is my last day at Canonical. I am happy that I could share my
working days with you and learn so much. It was a pleasure to
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:38 AM Athos Ribeiro
wrote:
>
> Bugs last updated on 2023-08-15 (Tuesday)
> Date range identified as: "Wednesday triage"
>
> https://pad.lv/2031442 | wireguard | Wireguard Broken In 23.04
>The user claims wireguard does not work at all in lunar, but does not
>
Hi
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 3:24 AM Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:20 PM Sergio Durigan Junior
> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, June 26 2023, I wrote:
> >
> > > Bug Triage
> > > ==
> > >
> > > ### https://pad.lv/1991441 | Confirmed | glusterfs | glusterd and
> > >
Hi Steve,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 2:48 AM Steve Langasek
wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 02:45:17PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > In the next few days, if all goes according to plan, I'll upload
> > rsyslogd to lunar with a
Hi,
In the next few days, if all goes according to plan, I'll upload
rsyslogd to lunar with a change[1] to the way its apparmor profile is
applied.
The confinement status won't be changed during upgrades, but fresh
installs will have the apparmor profile enforced by default. Up until
now, it's
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:07 PM Lucas Kanashiro
wrote:
> ## https://pad.lv/2004145 || D | New | wireguard
> | Massive (3x) performance regression for WireGuard in Ubuntu… |
>
> Andreas started to engage with the bug reporter. I did not try to reproduce
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 9:55 AM Athos Ribeiro
wrote:
> ## dsctriage ##
>
> Showing comments belonging to the Server category, updated on 2022-11-29
> (Tuesday)
> Automated Server Installs [Michael Hudson Doyle]
> (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/16612)
> └─ +82394 [Modem7, 2022-11-29]
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:52 PM Athos Ribeiro
wrote:
> Discourse Comment Triage Helper
> Showing comments belonging to the Server category, updated between
> 2022-11-18 (Friday) and 2022-11-20 (Sunday) inclusive
> Service - Kerberos with O… [Andreas Hasenac
freeradius was a flaky failure, the retry was successful and the
package is gone from the FTBFS list.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:13 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> I checked pam-p11 and freeradius.
>
> pam-p11 is legit, and I filed a bug[1] for it. I tested on s390x and
> ppc64e
I checked pam-p11 and freeradius.
pam-p11 is legit, and I filed a bug[1] for it. I tested on s390x and
ppc64el and the ftbfs happens there indeed.
freeradius looked odd, and when I retried in an s390x VM with
kinetic-proposed, it passed. I asked Graham on irc if he could retry
it on his ppa, or
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:32 PM Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 08 2022, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>
> > ## https://pad.lv/1987992 - *(New) [autofs]- autofs:
> > Missing support of SCRAM for SASL binds
> >
> > The bug reporter proposed a patch which
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 4:50 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
> Merges last authored or uploaded by Server team member or alumnus (via
> Merge-o-Matic)
> --
> bagel
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 8:36 PM Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
>
> ustriage found 27 bugs. These are the noteworthy ones:
>
> ### https://pad.lv/1915095 - *(Incomplete) [clamav] - clamscan modifies
> atime during scheduled scans
>
> Revisited the test case I had proposed and updated it to
Hi,
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 7:52 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
> pythonpy0.4.11b-3ubuntu1 0.4.11b-3.1
> Andreas Hasenack
Just made this a sync, since the same patch was applied to the debian package.
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 4:54 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
> tango 9.2.5a+dfsg1-2ubuntu1 9.3.4+dfsg1-1
> Andreas Hasenack
I merged tango and
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tango/9.3.4+dfsg1-1ubuntu1
migrated ~10 days ago
--
ubuntu-server m
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:53 AM Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andreas Hasenack
> wrote:
> > This reminded me that frr is also affected by this:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frr/+bug/1958162
> >
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:07 AM Evren Yurtesen wrote:
>
> Hi Robie and Utkarsh,
>
>
> This issue is not isolated to tomcat9 package. For example, jetty9 package
> logging does not work. Rsyslog says:
This reminded me that frr is also affected by this:
Hi,
I just wrote a lengthy email to a debian bug
(https://bugs.debian.org/1005236) and thought I should share it here
too. CCing ubuntu-devel@ since this is not an Ubuntu Server package.
This is the current situation with nfs-utils regarding LP bug
#1878601[1]. I guess the most important part is
Hi all,
quagga was removed[1] from Debian, and is unmaintained upstream. I'm
working on a MIR[1] for frr which is a fork from quagga and replaces
it.
I don't know yet if it's a 100% drop-in replacement, and wanted to ask
others at large how they would be impacted by the removal of quagga
from
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 5:57 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
>
> New Mergeable Version in Debian Unstable
> --
> high apache2 2.4.52-1 2.4.51-2ubuntu1
> high bind9
Here is an old MP when I dealt with bug patterns for the first (and last) time:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/apport/samba-security-share-bugpattern/+merge/327251
Hope this helps
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 2:38 PM Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 6:00 PM Robie
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 1:15 PM Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
>
> 5. LP: #1937316 - (New) [ubuntu-advantage-tools] - Cannot
>download source packages provided by Ubuntu ESM
>
> Pinged the other squad which looks at ua-tools, so they'll
> look at this one. We didn't do anything to the bug.
>
>
I change only the release-specific tag, not the generic one.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:19 AM Robie Basak
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:33:04AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > @Robie - maybe you can explain better what the right handling nowadays
> would be?
>
> I'm not sure, but the
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:07 AM Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This Wednesday I did my first triage, replacing Rafael.
>
> The only noteworthy bug I have is this one:
>
> - https://pad.lv/1676328 - *(Confirmed) [sssd] - sssd_be is leaking
> memory
>
> There has been a comment by
And after fixing those, I found 2 or 3 more. I will rename one to
"cyrus-sasl2 doesn't build with sphinx 3.2.x" and dupe the other(s).
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:10 AM Paride Legovini
wrote:
>
> Found 19 bugs, mostly being actively worked at.
> New bugs worth mentioning:
>
> LP: #1894907 -
I updated the bug with the new intention
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:51 PM Rafael David Tinoco
wrote:
>
> > The reporter is correct in that this comes up every now and then.
> > GlusterFS is very popular with samba clustering (CTDB) setups. Would
> > it be worth it to add a delta with debian and
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:07 PM Lucas Kanashiro
wrote:
>
> == Triage ==
> Bugs last updated on 2020-09-07 (Monday)
> Date range identified as: "Tuesday triage"
> Found 25 bugs
>
> The list of bugs today is longer than usual but most of them are bugs that
> people are working on or expired
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:50 PM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
>
> New Version in Debian Unstable
> -->
> low nginx 1.18.0-5 1.18.0-3ubuntu2
I grabbed nginx
--
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:47 PM Bryce Harrington <
bryce.harring...@canonical.com> wrote:
> New Version in Debian Unstable
>
> --
> high apache2 2.4.43-1
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:04 AM
Subject: Registration for DebConf20 Online is Open
To: , <
debconf-annou...@lists.debian.org>
The DebConf team is glad to announce that registrations for DebConf20
Online is
now open. To register for DebConf20,
FYI
https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/page/47-attend
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:01 PM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
>
> New Version in Debian Unstable
> --
> high apache2 2.4.43-1 2.4.41-4ubuntu3
> high nut
Just a heads up that I'm working in the bind9-libs migration:
bind9-libs (1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~build1 to 1:9.11.18+dfsg-1) in proposed for 20 days
candidate
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info:
Hello,
for this post-LTS cycle I wanted to cleanup our openldap packaging and
get more in line with Debian's. We have some very old delta that was
added circa 2009 due to likewise-open (as far as I could dig up), and
that we shouldn't carry anymore.
To that end, I started this [merge
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723350
Title:
sssd offline on boot, stays offline forever
To manage
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
** Description changed:
[Impact]
sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
In ubuntu that file is a symlink
This is fixed in 4.12.2 uploaded to groovy, so marking that task as fix
released.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Mustapa, about files being shown as directories, you are probably being
affected by bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1872476 which is an
in-progress SRU and has a fix uploaded to focal-proposed already.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
autopackage tests are also green: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#python-certbot-
nginx
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Checks (a), (b), (c), (d) passed, plus the comments from others who
installed the package on their servers or test rigs. Marking the
verification as succeeded.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you
a) Run https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot/TestScript.
Full output attached.
Package from proposed is installed:
*** 0.40.0-0ubuntu0.1 500
500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/universe amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.39.0-1 500
Focal verification tests (b), (c) and (d) below:
a) Running script from
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot/TestScript
b) Request a registration with nginx
sudo certbot -d certbot-test.justgohome.co.uk --agree-tos --staging
--register-unsafely-without-email --nginx
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ sssd can switch to an offline mode of operation when it cannot reach the
authentication or id backend. It uses several methods to assess the situation,
and one of them is monitoring the /etc/resolv.conf file for changes.
+
+ In ubuntu that file is a
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu Eoan)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
I'm trying[1] to back this out, but it will remove symbols from the
library without bumping the soname. Our next chance is when openldap 2.5
comes out, which will likely bump the soname.
1.
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+git/openldap/+merge/383797
--
You
ponse in
> virt-manager was far worse.
>
> --
> *From:* ubuntu-server on behalf
> of Andreas Hasenack
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:57 AM
> *Cc:* ubuntu-server
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 performance
>
>
Do you mean the vm is sluggish, or the virt-manager tool?
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:52 AM Leroy Tennison
wrote:
> I realize it's "just released" but have noticed something which is almost
> impossible to document in a bug report. Performance using virt-manager is
> sluggish at best whereas
Just tested and eoan is affected, focal is clear.
** Also affects: sssd (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723350
Ok, I have a simple way to reproduce this, and was able to test the
upstream patch. I'll polish it up and put it up for review, then prepare
the SRU paperwork.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug
For the SRU team reviewing this, I can confirm the bug is fixed in samba
4.12.2 which I will upload to groovy shortly:
root@groovy-samba-file-folder:~# gio info smb://127.0.0.1/testshare/123.txt |
grep '^type:'
type: regular
root@groovy-samba-file-folder:~# apt-cache policy samba
samba:
No, comment #8 shows disco is already fixed. This may be SRU material
for Bionic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827041
Title:
Regression in smbclient, username required
FYI
-- Forwarded message -
From: Karolin Seeger via samba
Date: Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:47 AM
Subject: [Samba] sambaXP 2020 - Online Edition - FOR FREE!
To: ,
SambaXP 2020 - Online Edition
The 19th International Conference for the open source software Samba
will take place
I patched the patch, ugh, but I'll think of a nice way to set this
dynamically before uploading. I'm dropping a lot of delta in the 2.4.50
merge :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
nee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875697
Title:
That comes from debian/patches/set-maintainer-name
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875697
Title:
drop fix-ldap-distribution.patch?
To manage notifications about this bug
I think dropping this delta is fine, as the "ubuntu" name will still
show as long as there is a delta. But looks like the email is wrong, we
should be showing ubuntu-devel@ there instead of the debian maintainers
list.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Debian tried it, and disabled this support again because it pulled in
too many dependencies: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941654
Samba 4.12.x has another spotlight backend, elastic search:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941654
I'm not a macos user so I'm
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memcached/1.6.5-2/
build log (warning: over 10Mb):
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memcached/1.6.5-2/+build/19216634/+files
/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-s390x.memcached_1.6.5-2_BUILDING.txt.gz
On s390x:
Test Summary Report
Uploaded, waiting for SRU team.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875471
Title:
python3-certbot-nginx is incompatible with its dependencies
To manage notifications about
** Tags added: bitesize
** Tags added: server-next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557157
Title:
apparmor profile denied for saslauthd: /run/saslauthd/mux
To manage
** Description changed:
This bug tracks an update for python-certbot from 0.39.0 to 0.40.0.
This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception
defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot.
[Impact]
Reguesting a certificate via the nginx
** Description changed:
This bug tracks an update for python-certbot from 0.39.0 to 0.40.0.
This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception
defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot.
[Impact]
Reguesting a certificate via the nginx
Successful run with apache:
ubuntu@certbot-test:~$ sudo certbot -d certbot-test.justgohome.co.uk
--agree-tos --staging --register-unsafely-without-email --apache
Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log
Plugins selected: Authenticator apache, Installer apache
Obtaining a new
** Description changed:
This bug tracks an update for python-certbot from 0.39.0 to 0.40.0.
This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception
defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot.
[Impact]
Not directly applicable; see the exception
** Description changed:
- This issue only affects version 0.39.0-1 of the python-certbot-nginx
- package in Ubuntu 20.04.
+ This bug tracks an update for python-certbot from 0.39.0 to 0.40.0.
+
+ This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception
+ defined at
Staging server test worked just fine. I'll prepare the SRU paperwork.
ubuntu@certbot-test:~$ sudo certbot -d certbot-test.justgohome.co.uk
--agree-tos --staging --register-unsafely-without-email --nginx
Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log
Plugins selected: Authenticator
Thanks for the test update, worked great:
(...)
testing section-continuations-2525.conf...passed
testing section-empty-continuations-2731.conf...passed
testing semacode-1598.conf...passed
testing two-blocks-one-line-1693.conf...passed
Success!
Package versions tested:
certbot 0.40.0-1
letsencrypt
https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/certbot-
tlssni01-1875471-d
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875471
Title:
python3-certbot-nginx is incompatible with its
That sounds good, let me prepare a separate ppa for (d)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875471
Title:
python3-certbot-nginx is incompatible with its dependencies
To manage
The testscript at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot/TestScript no
longer works:
Cloning into '/root/gopath/src/github.com/letsencrypt/boulder'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 2676, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (2676/2676), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100%
Ok, I filed bugs for the FTBFS issues, but per policy, we won't do an
update just to fix failed-to-build-from-source bugs: these should be
updated together with something else.
Thanks for all the options you outlined in comment #8, and for the check
in comment #11.
So to keep things simple:
a)
The server guide has a warning about this package being deprecated
(paride just added it):
https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/mail-postfix
"""
Deprecation warning: please note that the mail-stack-delivery metapackage has
been deprecated in Focal. The package still exists for compatibility reasons,
This was the deprecation notice sent back then:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/2018-March/007682.html
some replies came back in May:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/2018-May/007707.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thanks for getting back to us. I'll close the bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876622
Title:
Can't
I think this bug is wontfix, or opinion, but we need tasks for the Focal
release notes, and the server guide. I'm failing at that, can't figure
out the UI to do it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Focal)
Quick update on the current focal situation regarding some of these
packages:
These are currently an FTBFS in focal:
- python-certbot 0.40.0-1 (build-time tests fail)
- python-acme 1.1.0-1 (build-dep python3-idna <<2.8 not satisfied. When it was
last built in focal, python3-idna was at 2.6)
-
Sorry for having gone radio silent in the past few days. I'm back on
this tomorrow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875471
Title:
python3-certbot-nginx is incompatible with
Sorry, "Pay close attention", not "Play" :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876622
Title:
Can't upgrade samba-common-bin: undefined symbol: smb_strtoul
To manage
Yeah, that was probably the cause. To finish fixing your system
regarding the samba packages, you should be able to run these now:
sudo apt update
sudo apt -f install
Play close attention to what the last one tells you ("-f" stands for "fix"). If
it doesn't look unreasonable and it's asking
You may have had an old samba from 18.04 still installing, as a result
of your release upgrade. Could you please run this command and show the
output?
dpkg -l | grep -E "(samba|smb|registry-tools|winbind|libwbclient|ctdb)"
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You
Hello,
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:35 PM Leroy Tennison
wrote:
> (I don't know what's wrong with my mail but I had to open an attachment to
> see your reply). Thanks for getting back to me, ran 'apt-get install
> ca-certificates' and the reply was that it was already the latest version.
> Tried
I'm adding this to my list of delta to drop in this cycle.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875697
Title:
drop fix-ldap-distribution.patch?
To manage notifications about
Disco is EOL, marking its task as such.
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Disco)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839767
Title:
apparmor
PPA with test packages: https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu
/certbot-tlssni01-1875471
It has python-certbot with TLSSNI01 removed, probably not necessary for
this bugfix, but it allowed me to re-introduce the build-time tests for
the python-certbot-nginx package.
Will continue
Would this commit be correct to apply on top of 0.40.0 to at least match
python-acme 1.1.0-1 that is in focal w.r.t. TLSSNI01's removal?
https://github.com/certbot/certbot/commit/4b488614cf7749c8139c11f0983fe4b71e29827f
* Remove tls sni common (#7527)
* fixes #7478
* add changelog entry
If
1 - 100 of 3671 matches
Mail list logo
